Williams Envy
by Doug Adams
It's my goal, when I'm doing these articles, to try and tap into something
that's happened recently in films. I think that long-term retrospectives
work better for the actual FSM magazine, for obvious reasons. However,
what's big in movies right now? Pleasantville was well made, indeed, but
it came and went pretty quickly. I don't think there's going to be any
in-depth analysis of The Waterboy's score (though, I'd love to read
one just to see what one could say about it). No, the big news in movies
right now is... a trailer. That's right, the buzz of the moment is the
Star Wars trailer. It's even reared its omni-present head on our
very own FSM Message
Board and, in an unusual show of tolerance, no one has flamed people
for introducing a non-film music topic.
I don't have any comment about this crazy Star Wars mania, but
the uber-hype does get me worried when it comes to film music. Don't get
me wrong, I'm looking forward to John Williams's new Star Wars score
as much as any reasonable person could, but I'm concerned that it's going
to put another coal on a fire that could hinder film music for the coming
years. I'm speaking, of course, of Williams Envy. Don't roll your eyes,
I'm not kidding.
Star Wars came at the tail end of a long hot streak for film
music. Likewise, it kicked off one of the best periods in John Williams'
career. However, it also spawned a bevy of half-baked Williams' imitations,
none of which did much to further the art of film music. Sure, there was
the occasional Horner or Craig Safan score that could hold its head high
in mixed company, but for every meager success there were about fifteen
frothy nothings. To paraphrase Homer Simpson, John Williams must have been
rolling around in his grave.
What's to blame? Well, we can be certain that studio honchos were drilling
this aesthetic into composers' heads pretty severely. But, I think that
it can be equally attributed to an exaggerated fan-base for Mr. Williams.
Fans of this style of neo-Romantic style love John Williams. This fandom
extends to young composers, many of whom assume that they're the true heir
to the throne of Williams, hence they found it satisfying to write pseudo-Williams
scores. This has died out during the past five to ten years as Williams
has dug into darker and more adult fare, but you can't bet that it's going
to make a comeback this summer, at least to some degree. And if the new
Star Wars music is really good, the impact could be frighteningly
wdiespread.
I think that many young composers assume that, to be real composer,
one must follow in the footsteps of one's idols. It's an understandable
assumption. You listen to something, you love something, you are inspired
to become a composer. It's only natural to assume that one should work
in the genres that one loves to listen to. The problem is that, if a young
composer only writes in styles that he or she has heard and adores, he
or she will do nothing but work in established genres and styles. We can
see this right now where certain composers are doing ninth and tenth generation
rehashes of the scores they've loved in the past. And as we all know, this
results in nothing but watered down, safety-capped scores.
One of the toughest turns composers must make requires them to think,
"I love this. Now, I'll never touch it." Yet, in a way, it's
the only respectful thing to do. If a young composer falls in love with
the big, actiony John Williams style, what honor is he doing it or its
composer by doing an inferior version of it? In other words, if you're
going to attempt to write a John Williams-style score, why bother doing
it unless you can do it better than he can? More than anything, it's doing
this style a disservice--why create a dip in the line chart? From both
an artistic and business standpoint, what are you gaining by doing something
that you know someone else can do better? (Of course, much of Williams's
music is written in established styles itself, but Williams is kind of
the exception to the rule, here. He actually could do a better John Williams
score than anybody else.)
Who are the true greats of film music--the absolute upper echelon? You
can tick them off on your fingers one by one, and in each instance you'll
find that they wrote great scores as only they could. Herrmann wrote great
Herrmann scores. Goldsmith writes great Goldsmith scores. North wrote great
North scores. And so on. Goldsmith didn't write a great North score, and
vice versa. Individuality does far more for art than idolization. That
can be a scary prospect for a young composer, because every composer begins
life as a listener. Just like the casual listener, they fall in love with
the idea of music through the efforts of others. They also learn vicariously
through these efforts. What individuality requires--what it demands--is
that the composer throw out what he or she has learned to work. Want to
write a piece that represents a foreign world, an upended social structure,
and a desolate environment of prejudice? Jerry Goldsmith did it with serial
strings and woodwinds, mixing bowls, elephant bells, rams horns, and low
reeling piano figures. It's called Planet of the Apes. Now do it again...
but differently. You can't use serial writing; you can't use these unique
colorful instruments. You can't use Herrmann's theremins, electric violins,
tubas and vibes or minimalistic patterns. You can't use John Williams'
octatonic scales, double reeds, and post-Romantic phrasings. See the conundrum?
You have to uncouple all of the associations you've built up as a listener
over the years, but find something that's just as natural a match.
I'm looking forward to the new Star Wars films. I even stopped
by a theater on the way home Tuesday night to catch the trailer. But, I
sincerely hope that people will take this in stride. If it's good, love
it, but don't emulate it. Love it as someone else's achievement, not a
model for your own work. Composers always need to be brave enough to say
something in their own voices-to say something as only they can. Be the
first Composer X, not the next John Williams.
Next time: Less soap box, more movies.
Doug@filmscoremonthly.com
|