The Online Magazine
of Motion Picture
and Television
Music Appreciation
Film Score Monthly Subscribe Now!
film score daily 

Film Score Friday 4/2/99

by Lukas Kendall

Here is some exciting scoring assignment news: John Williams will score Bicentennial Man, the big July 4, 2000 movie directed by Chris Columbus and starring Robin Williams as an android who wants to become human (i.e. Data: The Motion Picture).

Basil Poledouris will score For the Love of the Game, the upcoming Kevin Costner picture directed by Sam Raimi about an aging major league pitcher involved in a perfect game. Poledouris is inspired casting for that subject matter -- should be a great one.

Wojciech Kilar is scoring Roman Polanski's The Ninth Gate, starring Johnny Depp.

Alien DVD News

Due June 1 from 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment is a 20th Anniversary Edition DVD of Alien, featuring a 68-minute documentary on the film and some exciting isolated music tracks: 1) all-new commentary by director Ridley Scott; 2) the soundtrack in French; 3) Jerry Goldsmith¹s original score as written and recorded, and placed in the movie as the composer intended; 4) the edited musical score (with tracked Freud cues) as its appears in the film, plus production sound in-between. This means for the first time, you can hear all of Goldsmith¹s music for the movie, and also compare his original spotting of the picture (with tons of unused music) with the final edited soundtrack. Time to get a DVD player! The package (produced by Sharpline Arts) will also contain theatrical trailers, storyboards, deleted scenes and outtakes.

Star Wars Fever

Wow, that 60 Minutes piece on George Lucas and The Phantom Menace was great. Reportedly it is being digitized at starwars.countingdown.com.

The Sunday Boston Globe last weekend had a huge piece on the upcoming score: http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/087/living/Making__Star_Wars__sing_again+.shtml

Finally, I'm told you can actually hear a cue from the score, "Naboo," in WAV format at http://www.theprequelcenter.8m.com/

Super News

Reponses to yesterday's update on the upcoming 2CD set of Superman: The Movie from Rhino:

From: Jeff Thomas, The Maestro <jthoma4@gl.umbc.edu>

    Many Thanks to Mike Matessino and everyone involved in the full release of the Superman score. Fans have asked and you have delivered! Out of curiosity, will there be a new interview with John Williams in the liner notes?

From: "Malamed, Laird" <lairdo@activision.com>

    In issue V4 no. 3, Andy Dursin points out that Varese Sarabande has done a fantastic job with re-recording scores. The lone exception is of course Superman. I heartily agree given that the album rarely leaves my shelves. (As compared to Empire or Raiders or the classic Bond scores, which I listen to quite often.)

    Having read Mike Matessino's column on the website this morning, I feel absolutely no disappointment in having bought the Superman re-recording because I think it helped to produced what sounds like an amazing restoration. Let's face it, if the Varese album had including the opening and performed the score at the correct tempo, the demand for this new Superman would have been much less. Since I would rather have the original score, I "almost" glad I shelled out the $22 bucks for the Varese version. So, in a bizarre way, we are again indebted to Mr. Townson.

    PS I thought the Midway and Sinbad albums were gems and I will continue to support the classic series.

From: Daniel Lee, Dsl1999@aol.com

    It was indeed heartening to hear that the SUPERMAN restoration is a reality as opposed to another predictable disappointment (from Time-Warner). Rhino should be applauded for their efforts. While Varese made noble attempts to return the soundtrack to all its glory, Rhino gets my vote as most praise-worthy of the year...

From: TOMASPDOUG@webtv.net (THOMAS DOUGLAS)

    Other than the new Star Wars music, I can not hardly wait for the restore music of Superman. What is heard in the movie should always be on the cd's.

    The score to Superman is the most exciting uplifting and John Williams top five scores that he has written. It has all of qualites that make a long lasting and a never dull score. It has romance, it has adventure, and of course sadness. Williams is the only composer who knows how to write a flying sequence. The music relays so much emotion.

    I never liked the Warner Brothers release of Superman, it bit the dust. I know back then in the 70"s the you were limited how much music that you could put on the album, around 20 minutes on each side.

    I remember as a youngster, how I was thrilled in the movie house at the begining sequence, with the "S" flying across the screen and the London Symphony Orchestra was in full stride, and the french horn was an octive higher than the rest of the orchestra. That to me is one of the greatest openings to movie, ever.

    But when John Williams needed to to be gentle with his score ie Lois Lanes' death, the music was so frigile. Comical ie Lex Luther and Otis. Awe insping ie the spaceship crashing threw the top of Jor-els labatory. Sadness ie the Death of Jonathan. Edge of your seat ie the Helicopter Crash.

    Last year John Debney released a two cd set of Superman music, not haveing the blessing of Warner Brothers and others he could not restore what he didn't have, a good effort, but it sounded a little thin at times. The Royal Scottish National Orchestra could not hit those patent John Williams high notes, like the LSO.

    Hey Studio Ex. We like Movie Soundtracks, the way that I hear them in the movies. My one wish is let me be incharge of a Studio for a day and let me correct the pratice of not putting all of the movie music on the the soundtrack CD.

    It has taken over 20 years for Warner Brothers to get it right and to make so many people happy! I bet also John Williams will be elated that he and his fans will finally hear that great score : SUPERMAN

Collectors for Plain Old Plastic Jewel Boxes Unite

From: Ken Bruzenak, KBGman@aol.com

    Just a random gripe about John Williams (breathless pause, gasp!), well, really, about the packaging of The Phantom Menace. I look forward in dread to the latest gimmick-laden CD package, given the goofy, self-destructo popup Lost World cardboard sleeve. That, the Raiders CD-case cardboard prophylactic, the Star Wars books that don't have a back cover track listing and are kind of fumbly to open in a moving car, and the foil-printed CE3K--they're all so comic book gimmicky and nonfunctional that I can't figure out why anyone goes to the expense. Does a shiny box make for an instant collectors' item? Try telling that to Marvel Comics right now.

    Please, whoever is in charge of marketing, don't waste money wrapping The Phantom Menace in candy-colored cellophane or stainless steel boxes. I'd rather have a second CD of the rest of the music. (Does anyone doubt a deluxe double CD of ALL the music will appear in a couple years?) I don't know if all this slick marketing is really just canny business acumen or sucking the consumer/corpse dry. I just like to listen to the pretty music.

John and Jerry Continued

From: CORBERAMA@aol.com

    In Nov., 1983, John Williams conducted the Los Angeles Phil in a performance of "The Planets" (Holst) and "Violin Concerto" (Williams). Goldsmith, David Rose and at least two other noted film composers were seen (by me) going backstage after the performance. In Spring, 1984, when a group of film composers conducted the New American Orchestra at the Dorothy Chandler in Los Angeles (incl. Goldsmith, Grusin, William Kraft, etc.) I went backstage to congratulate JG who, standing in front of me, puffed away on a cigarette while JW stood behind me waiting to talk to JG (JW's wife kept calling: "Johnny! Johnny!).

    I'd say that they admire each other professionally and are probably very good friends.

Patton CD Feedback

From: Zob10701@aol.com

    Talk about synchronicity!

    This past Thursday I got my copy of your Silver Age Classics CD of "Patton/Flight of the Phoenix" and no sooner had I ripped it out of the envelope, slapped it in my CD player and listened to the "Patton" tracks that "Patton" came on AMC just as the last notes of the "Patton" end titles had finished. Unfortunately, it also made me aware of a small error in Jeff Bond's liner notes as well. During the Hugh Fowler-edited scenes of Patton's dash across France it is Captain Stieger (the German officer who had been assigned to study Patton), not Rommel, who is shown in the German command post tallying Patton's victories against the German army.

    Did this insignificant fact in any way take away from my appreciation of a magnificent product, splendidly packaged, with superior sound (nice crisp percussion and those echoplexed triplets...ah...) you may ask? Hell, no!

    In my humble opinion, this is the best CD FSM has ever produced. The thing I like most about your Retrograde/Silver Age stuff is that you can tell that it's produced by people that have a true appreciation of not only the music, but the films themselves. It's this that I think sets you apart from all other soundtrack labels. Only the fanboys at FSM would put a still of the infamous Patton slapping scene (helmet caught in mid-air, no less) on the inside of the jewel case! It's the icing on the cake of a great release.

    Keep 'em comin' and I'll keep buyin' 'em!

Thanks! Sorry we got some insignificant caption wrong. By the way, see Douglass Fake's comments on our 100 Rifles CD at http://www.intrada.com/doug/doug.htm. Doug made some observations about the score which I hadn't even noticed, and I spent several months with this thing. Thanks Doug.

2001 Poll

From: "Kevin Jung" <altair@mail4.wmis.net>

    In your current poll regarding which score would have worked better for "2001" I really don't think you can get an accurate representation without bias towards Kubrick's choice.

    I've had the same conversation with some friends of mine who love the movie (and all think it's probably the best movie of it's type). Even though we all have North's score, and think it's wonderful (and wish we could have heard what he would have done with the rest of the film), it's hard to say whether it's "better" than the music Kubrick chose.

    Why? Because we're so familiar with the movie as it stands. It's hard to divorce yourself from what has been "familiar" for these 30 years and put something in it's place. Imagine a lost score to "Jaws" or "North by Northwest?" We are so used to the music we have come to know so well, it's nearly impossible to imagine a movie with different music. The music we've hear all these years just "fits."

    While I see what the beauty of North's score is, and can't help but wonder what the movie would be like with his score, I can't get out of my head the images and music of what I've seen all these years.

    "2001" is a classic movie. A great movie. Would it be better or worse with a different score? I don't think anyone could tell. Obviously it would give the movie a different "feel," but would it change the movie? This is something that can (and will) be debated for a long time.

From: Josh Gizelt <Josh.Gizelt@gte.net>

    Few people have a problem with the music as used in "A Clockwork Orange." The reasons for this are many; for one thing, the classical music heard is justified narratively- Alex likes classical music (especially Beethoven), so oftimes the music will reflect him and his attitudes. Furthermore, the intentionally ironic use of many tracks, such as "The Thieving Magpie," comes through loud and clear. And certainly no one who has seen that film can deny that "Singin' in the Rain" now sends shivers up their spines.

    Alex is never forgiven for his crimes, nor are they ever justified or explained. The final scene of the film is a jubilant shout for his returned abilities to rape and maim.

    It is this moral indifference that has defined much of Kubrick's later works (if not his earlier films, such as "Paths of Glory"), when he himself had taken over complete control of his projects. It is this moral indifference that attracts me in many ways to Kubrick's work. Despite what many may others think, I often found his works to be quite unpretentious works of modernism. As in modern music, (and some of the scores for his own films) Kubrick eschewed a "tonal center" to his work, and would often create very dissonant films that stand in neutral judgment on their chosen topics. The characters in "Dr. Strangelove" through to "Full Metal Jacket" are never assessed beyond their personal characteristics (in fact, one wonders what kind of personal life the intensely private Kubrick must have had when none is ever described for any of the characters in his films).

    The best known, and most widely seen film of Kubrick's is undeniably "2001- A Space Odyssey." It is incontrovertibly one of Kubrick's most important works, both thematically and technologically. It is also one of his most difficult films to understand (many people, apparently, were "uplifted" by the incredibly cynical ending) and the one that explains the least about itself.

    This extends to the music. We all know that Alex North had been commissioned to compose an original score to "2001," and we all know that score was rejected while still incomplete. This created waves in the Hollywood community because North's talent was so well known. Thanks to Varese Sarabande and Jerry Goldsmith, we now have a recording available of that score, and can compare what Kubrick threw out with what he used.

    While Kubrick maintains that "On the Beautiful Blue Danube" works because it is a beautiful waltz, bespeaking grace and beauty, many have argued that the placement of that piece of music over Heywood Floyd's journey works in the opposite way; the overfamiliar music acts as a sort of muzak, lending the amazing sights of space travel the feel of banality.

    His use of Ligeti music is understandable. The music is sound often without recognizable form (especially as presented in the film), very unfamiliar to the audience at large, but still unsettling to those that are familiar with it.

    The "Thus Spake Zarathustra" was, in all likelihood a forgone conclusion. North's title music is built around the same three-part mounting structure, and he himself has said that it was probably not going to be used... Kubrick's use of this piece has forever changed cinema; by using it to mark the moments of evolution, he has turned an already powerful work into something that had touched not only listeners of romantic-era music, but many of the contemporary world, from the cognoscenti to the pop culture pundits.

    As someone who is a very big Alex North fan, I find this score to be a classic among classics. North's music for "2001" contain some of his most interesting cues. I was made most familiar to this music (without realizing it) via North's score for "Dragonslayer," in which he used much of this material composed originally for "2001," and listening to the albums of both side by side, one hears that that "Dragonslayer," rather than being a re-working, is sort of a continuation (musically, not thematically) of that score.

    Kubrick's musical decisions, however, offered something that North's music, however accomplished, has not. It gave the film a certain timeless quality. The melange of music from the 19th and 20th centuries refused to root it in any particular moment in time, the way that North's music might have. The familiarity of some of the tracks allowed the double (and contradictory) reading of the "Blue Danube" sequences; while the North music is undeniably fantastic (and would no doubt have been lauded as so) it would not have had the same duality in reading as the Strauss piece.

    My conclusion is that, while "2001" would have been a better FILM with Alex North's score, it would not have been the same EVENT with it, and would not have had the same effect on film audiences around the world.

    Kurbrick's cinematic instincts have proven time and again to be interesting. His musical choices, while controversial, are never boring.

    A side note: LLEW1S commented that he did not believe that certain filmmakers would ever give film composers a chance... I agree and disagree.

    In the case of Martin Scorsese, I have never had a problem with how his films are populated musically. His use of songs and source music is totally justified, especially considering the milieu he tends to work in. However, he has worked in the past with a composer (most noticeably with Elmer Bernstein on "Age of Innocence").

    Milos Forman tends to make period films, but his contemporary films often have a period "feel" to them as well, which may be inspired by the music itself.

    Quentin Tarantino has said that the reason he has not used a composer on any of his films (a choice justified, again, by the kind of films he has made so far) is because he considers the music to be such an important aspect of the audience reaction to a film that he's not sure if, at this stage, he can trust someone else with it.

    I have discussed elsewhere on this site the fact that film students are not learning about film scores anymore, that the prevalence of songs in film is effecting the aesthetic of cinema, and that aesthetic is being propogated in the new artists.

    All I can say is this. Existing tracks and original scores have their place in cinema, and it is not one size fits all. It has to be tailored for each film. The people making those films can make good decisions or bad decisions. Or they can have those decisions made for them by the studio.

NPR Interviews

Here are some URL's for recent interviews on NPR with film composers:

John Barry (on Fresh Air): http://whyy.org/cgi-bin/FAshowretrieve.cgi?2581

Lalo Schifrin: http://programs.npr.org/npr2/PrgDisp.cfm?PrgDate=03/27/1999&PrgID=7

Hope these work! Thanks go to Jeff Eldridge who provided them. Have a great weekend.

MailBag@filmscoremonthly.com


Past Film Score Daily Articles

Film Score Monthly Home Page
© 1997-2009 Lukas Kendall. All rights reserved.