The Online Magazine
of Motion Picture
and Television
Music Appreciation
Film Score Monthly Subscribe Now!
film score daily 

Oh No! Something Bad About John Williams

by Lukas Kendall

Could it be? Something about John Williams that fans do not adore with all of their hearts? Something about John Williams that actually makes fans angry?

Oh my. Read on.

From: Josh Gizelt <Josh.Gizelt@gte.net>

    I have to say that John Williams' scores tend to be better served by being ordered chronologically, and as complete as possible. I cite the expanded "Star Wars," "Raiders," "Close Encounters" and, most recently, "Superman," as proof. Each album works much better than its predecessors (although Arista's "Star Wars" box set still has much to recommend it) precisely because the alterations made for listening purposes were taken away.

    Let's be blunt, here. Williams re-arranges his scores to make them more palatable for the lay person. The lay person probably doesn't appreciate this, as, if they buy a soundtrack album, they'll play it twice or three times at the most and it will collect dust ever after (that's why garage sale soundtrack LPs are usually in such good condition).

    His fans, however, for the most part, find his albums deficient because they alter the scores, and, as a result, often destroys the flow of the score, or may omit dramatic development.

    To reiterate: John Williams caters to the desires of those who don't care, while continuously annoying his fans.

    I will grant you that "The Phantom Menace" is a particularly irksome example, as much of the album features such moments as "Jar-Jar's Introduction" at the expense of such cues as the one when Anakin leaves home, and has tracks that are a complete mishmash from all over the film ("Qui-Gon's Noble End" gets my "Inner City" award as most confusing track), and contains a blatant mistake ("The Arrival at Naboo" is really "The Arrival at Coruscant," and, as a result, appears twice on the album). It is, quite simply, a botched job. The score deserves much better than this (and I think that the deficient album has colored many people's reaction to this score, as what is heard in the film is quite interesting, not to mention moving).

    While I understand fully the brutal marketplace environment soundtrack albums are being released in, I sincerely believe that Sony would not have had too much trouble moving a LCD set of this particular score given the performance of RCA Victor's releases.

    Either way, "The Phantom Menace's" score could have been represented much better on disc. Trust me, no one would complain if there was less Jar-Jar music on it.

Josh's letter does sum up the gripes of many collectors dissatisfied with the Phantom Menace album. And Williams has historically compiled soundtrack albums out of chronological sequence with many short segments removed so as to make the "listening experience" more appealing.

Does Williams need an "intervention"? Is this really a big deal? Write in with your thoughts!

MailBag@filmscoremonthly.com


Past Film Score Daily Articles

Film Score Monthly Home Page
© 1997-2010 Lukas Kendall. All rights reserved.