Lost Issue: The Composer Guy
John Ottman Interview Part 2 of 4
by Mike Shapiro
Mike Shapiro: You mentioned in your last interview that you see
the '60s and '70s films as a sort of artistic pinnacle from which film
music has subsequently fallen. Do you see the predominance of sound effects
that's arisen since that time has contributed to that change?
John Ottman: That's a soapbox issue for any composer these days.
I could talk an hour about that... I mean, I just wish in the middle of
a mix, we could just stop a moment and all go into a room and watch the
best films of film history, and just listen to the mixes. Have the sound
people sit there and watch, and then look at them in the eye, and say "Now
what did you want to do with this movie that we're working on now?" The
proof is in the success of films in the past. Films like Star Wars,
Psycho, Lawrence of Arabia -- hundreds of them -- are the
obvious example of how music is the driving force... If music's there,
it's there for a reason. The effects are there to basically have us believe
a scene. If you shoot a scene of a car going by, then all we need to do
hear just enough car to realize, "This film was filmed in sound." Unless
the car engine has something to do with the storyline, it's just a car
engine, for God sakes. In Cable Guy we're cutting back and forth
between Matthew Broderick racing to a different location where Jim Carrey
was. It was an intercutting sequence, and the music's job was to tie all
that together. And every time we cut to that !*#%@^ Jeep, it's all you
can hear -- the music was gone for that moment and back again -- until
the thunder claps. It completely defeated the purpose of the music. I think
many of the sound effects people are so focused on their millions of sound
effects, they often lose the big picture.
MS: Anything else anecdotal that's worth reciting about the experience?
JO: Like one of the Sony music executives told me, "John, this
is one of the best baptisms you could ask for."
MS: So this was your hazing.
JO: Right. So I can handle it all, knock on wood!
MS: So other than your commitment to Bryan, have you had any
interest in your editing? I hear you've turned down some notables.
JO: Don't remind me! Yes. Ridley Scott, Paul Verhoeven, Danny
DeVito, Renny Harlin to name the ones that come to mind. Yikes, am I nuts?!
MS: No comment. So, you've also been involved in a live adaptation
of Snow White. Can you tell us a little about it?
JO: As I was finishing up Cable Guy, I was beginning preparations
for Snow White in the Dark Forest. That's why I couldn't be at the
Cable Guy final mix. The Snow White people liked the idea
of temp-scoring the film with original synth renderings as it was being
constructed, so it was a repeat experience, keeping up with an ever-changing
film and completing renderings in time for a multitude of test screenings.
MS: So you were writing...
JO: I was writing as they were editing. And this film was re-edited,
and re-edited, and re-edited. Fortunately, although they kept changing
the cuts in Snow White, I had seen an early assembly of the whole
film, so I knew basically where I had to stop and start in terms of developing
the score. This score is 75 minutes in a 90-minute movie, so it was very
important to sort of see a rough assembly first so I could design themes
around characters and create a master plan of how they could all converge
at the end.
This movie reminds me of a film that came from the '70s, not that it's
a great film, but because it's very basic filmmaking. So I scored things
in a very traditional style, where there are strong themes and motifs that
come around. Snow White's mother has a motif, so when Snow White remembers
her, we hear that motif. Snow White has her own theme, Claudia (played
by Sigourney Weaver) actually has three themes, one when she's talking
to the mirror, before anything happened, one for after she's become evil,
and one that represents her as whole from which the two sub-themes are
drawn. Also, there are motifs for her that have nothing to do with her
theme, like when she's doing something overtly evil. Then there's a love
theme created between Snow White and the outcasts, which are basically
the dwarves in this film. So those are the major themes.
MS: How did you spot the film?
JO: Spotting was a joke, of course. In Suspects we didn't
spot it because I'd already temp-scored it, so when spotting date came
we just looked at each other and nodded, and that was the spotting day.
With Cable Guy the spotting session was watching the movie with
my temp score. "Yep, that's fine, that's fine, more here, etc." So spotting
was just confirming that the temp score was correct, or discovering it
was off here and there.
MS: But even still when you're getting the scene, how do you
decide what scenes get music and what don't? Or did you work on that in
advance...?
JO: Well reading the script helped... and, like I mentioned before,
being a film editor, I had a sort of sixth sense, having seen all the dailies,
all the rough footage, of what was going to go and what was going to stay.
I was pretty much able to predict if there was a scene coming after the
scene I was scoring, whether it was going to stay or not, and I sort of,
keeping that in mind, knew where the film was going before it happened.
Fortunately it seemed to work. Of course I tweaked it as it became more
and more of a final product.
MS: Do you think the director or producer were aware of this,
or that they thought any film composer could handle...?
JO: I don't know. That's why it's always bad to start new precedents
because it opens the can of worms. I hope no composers are required to
do what I had to do.
MS: Back to Snow White. Now this is a dark twist on the
story, almost perversely so, so what was the idea for the musical approach,
both from the director's standpoint and your own? And, to back up a step,
how did you get involved in the project?
JO: I guess once again, it was The Usual Suspects. They
wanted a dark, rich score, but also something that wouldn't be the typical.
In other words, they didn't want people to say, "Oh, that's a Williams
score or an Elfman score." So being a new guy, that was perfect, since
not too many know who the hell I am anyway! But, besides, I think I had
a good meeting with them... I totally fell in love with the script -- it
read like a composer's showpiece, a real tapestry of music. And when I
met Dawn Soler at PolyGram music I told her I was all over this movie.
This was exactly what I wanted to do, because my ongoing dream is to do
a Dances with Wolves sort of sweeping score. This wasn't exactly
that, but it was dark and I sensed it had the leeway to let me do a sort
of Romantic score. So it ended up being a little bit horror-like, and more
creepy than I thought it was going to be, and it didn't really translate
exactly to the script. But it was a musical showpiece for any composer,
because the music had to carry this movie. There were some problems with
the film, so the music had to be the element that drove it. There was pretty
much agreement on all parties. The producers seemed to be of the more aggressive
camp, wanting me to hit things a little bit more on the head than the director
did.
And Sigourney wielded some power in the film, saw the film temp-scored
with my score, and so she was able to make some comments on the score as
well, and wanted some of the hits subdued a bit, and wanted to make sure
we didn't make her character too dark. So she kind of pushed the score
back in the direction I had originally wanted.
MS: Do you know if she liked the score?
JO: We played her a couple of cues, and she seemed to like it.
MS: Film composers never get to meet stars...
JO: Yeah. I met Carrey -- a really nice, amazingly talented guy.
Unfortunately I couldn't be there when the music was presented to Sigourney,
my music editor got to do that. She played it on a boom box in front of
her.
MS: How would you differentiate this score from Suspects?
JO: Well Suspects, although in a sense, romantic, didn't
have any sort of real romance in it, whereas this does. Suspects
was more difficult to ride the fine line, where this was easier because
anything went on this film; it's complete fantasy. That's why I had a blast
scoring it because I was able to really feel uninhibited and "go for it,"
in the words of the producers, which they used all the time. "Go for it"
is totally what a composer wants to hear. Basically it was one of the most
fun assignments I've ever had, because I had a real feeling of freedom
on the movie; there was very little interference. I got to write the score
I wanted to write, and record it... and much of this is some of the best
stuff I've ever done.
MS: You worked non-union, recording in Seattle... How do you
think it compares to doing it locally?
JO: Well, I have to first preface by saying that the union players
in L.A. are amazing, and I valued their talent on Cable Guy because
they were able to adapt to changes immediately. I totally fell in love
with Seattle, however, and the Seattle Symphony players, and the church
there, and the acoustics, and the whole creative environment was unequaled.
We could break rules, overdub to our heart's content, etc. So it was a
blast. Any time you travel somewhere there's already a sort of easing of
tensions, because you're going to a new city. On top of that, Seattle is
beautiful, it wasn't rainy, it was sunny, we got to record in this church,
and the moment I heard the first note on downbeat I was flabbergasted.
We didn't use any processing or reverb as we monitored... basically we
used the room mics and it sounded amazing.
With the film's low music budget and 75 minutes of full symphonic music
to record, a union recording would have been impossible. We had four days
of recording and they wanted me to cut down the orchestra by 20 musicians.
From my experience with Suspects, I knew if we cut the string section
to half, I could keep all my brass and woodwinds, and overdub strings on
each cue three times, making 22 sound like 66. My recording engineer had
his doubts, but we set up for it -- we used a lot of tracks because we
wanted the room ambiance. I think I sold my engineer on it when we were
done. But what really shocked me was that even on the first pass with a
total of 22 strings it sounded almost acceptable, and that's how amazing
the acoustics of that room are -- and how good my engineer, Tim Boyle,
was too.
MS: 22 strings total? Not violins?
JO: Total. So by the third pass it sounded, needless to say,
fantastic. Also to save money, we had the same musician play harpsichord,
celeste and piano -- which are usually playing together in every cue. So
we basically had to go through the score two more times to record his stuff.
Of course, not everything on the soundtrack was done by the Seattle
group. There's this whispering effect on one of the tracks. I recorded
my voice eight times on a multi-track and whispered evil gibberish, and
sampled it. So it sounds like this demented chanting. I realized, though,
that I needed it to be syllabic, so on one track I did "Sea Shells by the
Sea Shore," which you can hear if you listen carefully!
MS: What were the time constraints?
JO: Well, just like Cable Guy, in the last three weeks
before we had to record, they substantially changed the film and 75% of
the score had to be rewritten to accommodate the cut, and I had three weeks.
It was a huge process to squeeze in. In fact, we were writing the choir
lyrics the day before we left for Seattle. And it's funny, I don't have
anyone who does that for me; so I'm sitting here in my studio, I'd written
all the choir parts already, but I'd never really decided what the lyrics
were going to be. I don't know much Latin, except the basic phrases you
hear all the time in these scores. I sat down with my assistant and we
strung together a bunch of bullshit Latin words and it sounded great!
MS: So you had two months in total, of which three weeks was
reworking 75% of the music.
JO: Right. Because the structural revisions were so substantial
in Snow White, I was writing 3-4 minutes a day. Some of it was revisions,
but most of it had to be completely revamped. The scenes were completely
re-arranged... a cue would run across four scenes, and they'd take those
scenes and put them in different parts of the movie.
MS: So that wasn't the period between the two films?
JO: The moment I was off Cable Guy, they wanted to test-screen
Snow White in a week and a half with as much of my music as possible.
I got about halfway through it for the first screening.
MS: Were you happy with the overall outcome?
JO: It was the first time I actually was happy with what I'd
written upon hearing it on the first pass. I think it was the best time
I've had scoring a film. And then we added the choir, and I know a big
smile went across my face! One casualty though was in the final mix, out
of all that music, of all cues, my favorite one was axed and replaced by
a cue from another scene. It worked, but now the cue will only be heard
on a CD. The cue's called "The Awakening." The director thought it too
sentimental. Call me a sap!
MS: So we can hear it on a soundtrack album?
JO: Because it was non-union, they can afford to release a score.
I'm holding off trying to do it myself or with PolyGram until we see if
the film's released. If the film's released, then the CD should be an automatic
thing.
MS: What are your hopes for the film?
JO: I don't know how the film's going to be received. Often a
composer's score goes down with the ship, or occasionally you can stay
above the film... I'm hoping the latter happens of course! Um... that is,
if the ship does sink. The final mix is really, really good. The music
mixer had a great instinct. So, no matter how the film's received, the
score is very present.
MS: Now that you've done these three full feature scores -- two
of which seem to have been brutal in some way or the other -- do you miss
editing?
JO: Well, I miss the power and control of editing a project I'm
involved with, but I don't miss the invisibility. I'm gearing up for Bryan's
next movie, which I will be editing and scoring again. I have this trepidation
about my name disappearing from the landscape for a long period of time
because of the long editing process, but I just have to accept that.
MS: The sense I was trying to get was... you made this big shift
in your career from going from editor to composer, because this is what
you wanted to do more. Having gone through these trials by fire, do you
feel happy about that decision?
JO: When it's all said and done, I love scoring films. I mean,
like with any intense field, you ask yourself, "Is this all worth it?"
You have no life to speak of, but then again, I don't anyway! So the moment
I have a break of more than four weeks I'll be depressed again because
I won't be working. You can't win! But because this all happened so fast
to me, every single day I thank my lucky stars that this is happening.
I don't take it for granted at all. But, it's not for the weak of heart
or faint of stomach. If you're prone to ulcers don't get into film scoring!
MS: So what's coming up with Bryan Singer?
JO: Well the last time I mentioned something that was coming
up it never happened and I was on hold for three months waiting for it.
So if anyone wonders what happened to me between The Usual Suspects
and Cable Guy, I was basically "unavailable," twiddling my thumbs
waiting for this supposed film to happen. Then they pulled the plug and
I was basically s-o-l. Then after Snow White it happened again.
Our next film together was supposed to be filming now, so I was once again
declared unavailable for any projects. Then the film was delayed a couple
weeks, then a month... now mid-February. So once again, I'm kind of on
hold -- as of this interview. Maybe by the time this is printed, I'll be
working on something between now and February.
But I'm looking forward to working with the Suspects team again.
You know, it may be a smaller budget movie, but to me it's often more fulfilling
because it's something different, more pure and remembered -- we hope.
So hopefully it'll be worth the wait.
MS: What's the nature of the project?
JO: A very, very, very extremely dark movie based on a Stephen
King story called Apt Pupil. It's about a strange boy who's obsessed
with World War II and the Holocaust, and discovers a Nazi War criminal
living nearby and blackmails the guy to tell him all the things about the
Holocaust that the public may not know. And being a typical Stephen King
story the tables begin to turn, and pretty soon the kid is being blackmailed
by the old man. It's got dream sequences and is like an open book once
again for me. (I'll make sure those dream sequences exist so I can write
long cues!) Oh, and I'll be making my cameo as a high school band conductor.
MS: I understand you're an associate producer on this as well.
JO: One more title for me, mainly symbolic. [laughs]
MS: You received the British Academy Award for best editing on
Suspects, but were you disappointed that Suspects didn't
get a nod from our Academy, given that other aspects (e.g. Chris McQuarrie's
script) did very well?
JO: Naw. I didn't want to win anything! [laughs] I came close
on the editing, but as for score I knew I didn't have a snowball's chance
in hell being this new guy that came from nowhere. Oh! But I did win an
award for best score. The Academy of Science Fiction Fantasy and Horror
films' Saturn Award. I totally forgot to mention that! [laughs] I was up
against Danny Elfman, Howard Shore and James Horner. It was a funny evening
when I was presented that award. My parents were there, and as a kid I
would drive them nuts playing the "Klingon Battle" from Star Trek over
and over, day in, day out. So when I got up on stage, I had a little tape
player I was going to hold up to microphone and play the "Klingon Battle"
and apologize to my parents publicly. The irony is that the presenter for
that award was George Takei! So he got a kick out of that as well. It was
even funnier because I had attended a Star Trek convention (hey,
I admit it!) a year before Star Trek: The Motion Picture and recorded
George Takei speaking about the film, which was the most Earth-shattering
event to me in world history at the time. And I had played that tape in
my parents' house as well.
The other biggest highlight for me this year was I got to meet Jerry
Goldsmith, whom I worship. He was sitting behind me...there were two tables
at the BMI dinner, and my back was to Jerry -- we were literally two feet
from each other. But I wouldn't turn around because I couldn't conceive
of talking to him. His white suit was glowing as if he were some unearthly
presence. But Richard Kraft, my agent, knowing full well the situation,
sat me down next to him when his wife left to restroom and said, "Meet
Jerry." I basically had three minutes to fill him in on my life since birth...
I don't think he knew what hit him. I left the table knowing that his head
was spinning...I think I spoke so fast he was barely able to make sense
of anything I had to say. So if Jerry's reading this I apologize for sounding
like a complete buffoon. The biggest shocker was that he told me that he
liked my score to Usual Suspects. That just blew my mind. Of course
I immediately said, "Well, there's a lot of you in there." And he very
kindly said back, "There's a lot of you in there too." I floated out of
the dinner, buzzed on more than wine.
To be Continued...
MailBag@filmscoremonthly.com
|