Jerry Goldsmith Panel Discussion Part Three - Conclusion
A London Film Festival Granada Carlton Masterclass at the National Film
Theater 1998
Written and transcribed by the cellist and reviewer Richard Harwood
Following the panel discussion, a Q & A session was to end this
rare and amazing event. These were some of the questions asked:
Neil Brand (regular musician at the NFT): I would like to kick
off with one of my own because, having seen the film, one of those wonderful
things about the score is how it tells you what's out there that you can't
see. I'm thinking in particular, there's one sequence in which we see Anthony
Hopkins fishing, and you wrote a lovely piece which is almost down in that
watery environment -- we're with that fish, that little gold thing trying
to attract the fish -- and then the camera is away from the river, and
suddenly we get this sense of suspense and danger, and then I think I'm
right in saying there's a focus pull and there's the moment. Now, that
must have been a decision you had to take -- whether to have the music
tell you the bear was going to be there, or whether to have the music not
do that. Now, was that something that came up as early as 'spotting' the
film?
Lee Tamahori (director of The Edge): It's self-evident.
The imagery is, actually, telling you anyway. So, what Jerry was doing
at that point is, actually, just helping the imagery out. There was no
way that the imagery wasn't telling you that something was going to happen
anyway, so it would have been foolish for us not to actually amplify that
with the music. It's a fine line between telling 'Look out, something's
going to happen...' If I could be a little clearer about that, had I not
had these two particular shots -- which are somebody's point of view that's
kind of drifting around -- had I not had those shots, and Jerry had done
something kind of sinister with the music, it may have actually tipped
its hand more. But as I was doing it visually anyway, Jerry was just following
along with these visual clues.
Jerry Goldsmith: What happened is...before you went to those
point of view shots [the music] was very placid, sort of serene, and on
the point of view shots I made the transition there -- but not that heavy.
I mean, it was like something was a little bit amiss. That was something
that I don't think we discussed. I think Lee figured I was smart enough
to figure that one out for myself [laughing].
NB: I was also interested with the plane crash that you didn't...I
mean there's a lot going on there obviously, but you didn't actually score
the plane crash, hitting the mountains going into the lake.
LT: Ah, but we did. Now here's an interesting thing. This is
what happens later on. These are very trick decisions. Jerry has a music
editor, and he has worked with Kenny Hall for decades I believe, but these
are very close relationships as well. After [having written the score],
Jerry's off doing his next job, or whatever, on holiday, and I'm sitting
mixing this picture and Jerry's long gone. Now, his key link to the whole
mixing process is actually his music editor, so Kenny was with us when
we were mixing dialogue and effects and music together. When it came to
the plane crash...now Jerry had actually scored...this plane flies in to
a flock of birds and all hell breaks loose. It just goes roaring down amongst
the mountains and eventually hits...it's kind of a three stage crash --
you know, hits birds, comes down, breaks off a piece on a mountain rocky
ledge, and then it keeps on going down and bits fall off, and eventually
it hits the water. They go under water and guys swim out of this plane,
get to the top, save their lives and drag themselves onto shore.
Jerry scored the whole thing all the way through. As we came to mix
this thing, I suddenly...and I hadn't seen this before. Had I known so,
I would have stopped [Jerry] at the scoring stage. But I couldn't see it
until we had all these elements. The mixing of, especially the effects...once
you heard that, I suddenly had this idea -- it might be more terrifying
to actually have the impact with just purely effects and no music at all
because there seemed to be enough visual information and audio information
of wreckage and breaking glass and stuff to just be jarring enough. But
having done that, I was now ahead of Jerry's track and I had to almost
literally cut it in half.
Things like this send Ken Hall into apoplexy because you don't want
to be just starting on some random beat. So we went through it carefully
and I said, 'Look, why don't we do this -- take out the whole impact where
they hit the birds, take out everything where the plane hits rock faces,
and start the score where Jerry's got it once the plane hits the water.'
Because the impact on the water was so huge in terms of effects, it managed
to disguise the introduction of the track at that point. So once we go
under water, it seemed like a good editing point, if you will, to reintroduce
the track. Now it seamlessly plays as if the track started there but only
Jerry and I, and Kenny, will know how awful that is a decision as it comes.
Now I look at it, I'm glad I made that decision. It's horrifying to do
it like that but now what you have are these moments of terror...the terror
is amplified. If the music was still in there, it was actually detracting
from the scene. We were going from screaming panic inside a small aircraft
to big exteriors where we were just hearing tiny sound effects and a motor
that was running down and so it seemed to me that this jumping from big
sounds to small sounds, without music, actually helped the scene out. It
is one of those moments...Kenny's ringing up Jerry, wherever he is, and
saying 'Do you know what these guys are doing?' [audience laughing] But
I'm sure it happens and only Jerry could tell you this...I'm sure it has
happened on every movie and in some way or another, those things do happen.
You chop, change, you have to slice pieces out. Kenny did some extraordinary
things in here -- I swapped a couple of little pieces around. Blasphemous
though it seems, I felt that, suddenly once I heard it when we were mixing
it, god, I wished I had changed [that around. But Kenny] found a way of
cutting that and making it work brilliantly so...
JG: Rarely does 100 percent of your score end up in the movie.
It's a fact of life. For some of these decisions are made...you know, I
say 'I really don't think music should be there.' He says 'Well, do it
and if it doesn't work we won't use it.' Which is really wonderful. I say
'Well wait a minute, do you know how much work that is?' [audience laughing]
'If you're not going to use it then why am I wasting my time on something
that's questionable when I can spend more time to work on something that
we know is important.' That wasn't the case here, although I did feel,
I must say, when we 'spotted' the picture -- Ưand I think I even expressed
it -- do we really need music on this crash. I'm not going to give up here,
see, I knew it all along! [laughing all around] So when Kenny told me...he
made his inevitable phone call to me, 'Do you know what they're doing?'
And I said 'Yes,' and I said 'Well, it sounds OK to me.' You get used to
this. You do something for long enough, you know all the tricks...there
are few surprises left. The composer has to develop the attitude, what
is best for the film. That's the toughest thing, I think, for a director,
is all these egos he's gotta work with, forgetting his own ego, he's got
all the other people. Everybody that's contributing to this film has got
their own ego and they think that their contribution is the most important
in the film, probably from the honey wagon driver up to the lead actor.
And everybody's contribution is terribly important but they are all parts
of the sum total. So I think the greatest task the director has is to sort
this all out and somehow keep all these egos in line. And that's something
I've learned. Yes, my contribution is terribly important to the film but
is not the ultimate. Whatever works to make a film better for all of us.
How often do you use twentieth century compositional technique?
JG: A lot more in the '60s and '70s. I think that Freud,
Planet
of the Apes, The Mephisto Waltz, some other films, employed
some of the avant garde techniques. I think that film making was different
then. I think they are making a more conservative kind of film today and
the music goes more in that more traditional, harmonic and compositional
structure. The key thing about composing for films is the versatility and
one must be able to adapt to the various dramatic modes of the film and
the demands of them. But Planet of the Apes certainly gave the composer
the freedom to be as abstract with the music as he wanted to be. It was
necessary for a film like that. And so I could write almost a dodecaphonic
score for that. There was a very romantic nature to The Edge, plus
there was the viciousness of the bear which gave me a chance to be a little
more, say, forward-thinking with the music. What one has to do is to be
able to balance these elements. The trick is to be able to, within the
confines of one score, stylistically be as conservative harmonically, and
yet, in other occasions be as abstract as you want it to be -- yet make
it all sound as one.
What film have you most enjoyed doing the score for and which have
you found the most challenging?
JG: I think the most challenging picture, up until now, has been
Basic
Instinct. I don't know, the enjoyable films are the little films like
Rudy, which nobody even saw over here. They're fun because you just
write a pretty melody. You don't have to get violent, or anything. You
don't have bears to deal with.
Many thanks to Simon Ward, events officer at the National Film Theater.
If you would like to become a member of The Official Goldsmith Film
Music Society please write William Finn at 2135 Deer Hollow Court, Martinsville,
IN 46151, USA. Readers outside America should write Jonathan Axworthy at
102 Horndean Road, Emsworth, Hampshire, PO10 7TL. England.
Richard Harwood can be reached at 77 Highfield Avenue, Waterlooville,
Hampshire, PO7 7QP. England.
MailBag@filmscoremonthly.com
|