Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Aug 30, 2014 - 7:56 PM   
 By:   Mr. Jack   (Member)

I would say Goldsmith was a master of several musical forms that were hard to pin down. If someone apes John Williams, Ennio Morricone, Bernard Herrmann, or John Barry (just to mention a few), you know exactly what these scores are going to sound like (or try to sound like), but off the top of my head I can't think of many composers who have tried to copy Goldsmith's endlessly malleable style. Maybe James Newton Howard's action music in the 90's, but I'm drawing a blank on many others (although Mark Mothersbaugh's score for the Jason Statham actioner Safe had some definite Jerry-isms).

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 30, 2014 - 8:07 PM   
 By:   bobbengan   (Member)

I'd actually probably argue CHRISTOPHER YOUNG to be more versatile as a composer, though of course he is best-known for his horror output.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 30, 2014 - 9:04 PM   
 By:   Dan Hobgood   (Member)

Most versatile film composer???

Jerry was the most versatile anything composer (I've ever heard, anyway).

Dan


You need to expand your horizons then.


Um, to, genius???

Jesus . . . .

Dan

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 30, 2014 - 9:20 PM   
 By:   hurlburt.lazar   (Member)

Versatile? Yes! Most versatile? No. Herrmann was as versatile; look at Williams' total output, and he has a vast versatility; ibid Bernstein. Goldsmith the greatest? No. One of the greatest? Without question.

The Fan-Boy in me wants to make grand statements about any artist I greatly respect: Olivier, Williams (the late Robin), Martin, Williams (the one you thought previously), de Nero, Sagan, etc, but I also know the roster of greats is... great, & "greatest" is a term that requires more back up than "Because I think so."

That being said, Jerry was extremely versatile - especially in the '60's - mid '80's; and is one of the great film composers of all time. Them's the facts; and we can all celebrate that, regardless of who we feel is "best."

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 30, 2014 - 9:27 PM   
 By:   paul rossen   (Member)

One word...Yes.

 
 Posted:   Aug 30, 2014 - 9:46 PM   
 By:   DeviantMan   (Member)

I would say Goldsmith's versatility during the 1960s up until the mid 80s was near godlike.

After that, his less complex scoring and reliance on synths for added color displayed a slightly limited overall palate of creativity.

 
 Posted:   Aug 30, 2014 - 9:48 PM   
 By:   DeviantMan   (Member)

Online error....

 
 Posted:   Aug 30, 2014 - 9:48 PM   
 By:   DeviantMan   (Member)

??????

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 30, 2014 - 9:51 PM   
 By:   Doc Loch   (Member)

I think there are a lot of signatures in Goldsmith's work, though they tend to break down into different periods in his career. One device he used in some of his mid-seventies' scores was evident in the arrangements of his ending cues (at least in the album versions), where he would abruptly cut off the melody and insert three accent notes before going into the final recapitulation. I'd have to dig out the albums but I seem to recall you hear this in Logan's Run, Cassandra Crossing and a few others. Although early on Goldsmith developed a reputation for finding just the right sound to fit the film (see the variety of scores he did for Franklin Schaffner films), it seems to me in later years he got somewhat typecast and I find a lot of his action cues for the later scores pretty much interchangeable. Also, maybe it's because he was such a perfect film composer in terms of finding the right musical effect to support the images that I don't find a lot of his music all that interesting to listen to on its own (I'm certainly not in the need-to-hear-every-single-cue camp). It feels to me like a lot of the music was specifically designed to interact with the visual elements and separated from the purpose for which it was intended it seems to be lacking something.

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2014 - 12:28 AM   
 By:   Loren   (Member)

Was Goldsmith the Most Versatile Film Composer?
The answer is "of course not". Any composer from the 40s or 50s or 60s, or even any Italian composer, can surpass Goldsmith in "versatility".

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2014 - 3:20 AM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)

Versatile? Yes! Most versatile? No. Herrmann was as versatile; look at Williams' total output, and he has a vast versatility; ibid Bernstein. Goldsmith the greatest? No. One of the greatest? Without question.


Herrmann: One of my faves, but he always sounds like Herrmann.
Williams: Have not heard much by him
Goldsmith: Never said he was the greatest. Re-read my first post.

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2014 - 9:44 AM   
 By:   Khan   (Member)

Most versatile film composer???

Jerry was the most versatile anything composer (I've ever heard, anyway).

Dan


You need to expand your horizons then.


Um, to, genius???

Jesus . . . .

Dan


How predictable.

Look, if you think Goldsmith is the most versatile anything composer you've ever heard, you clearly need to expand your musical horizons beyond film scoring and realize there's a hell of a lot more music out there. Past and present, there are a great many composers who are just as versatile, if not moreso, than Goldsmith or any film composer out there.

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2014 - 11:43 AM   
 By:   ToneRow   (Member)


What do you think?


I think, Onya, that your subject should be rephrased.

You are referring to playing an album and unable (initially, that is) to identify the composer of said music based upon your prior listening experiences and previous familiarity with any composer's harmonic fingerprints.

Herrmann always sounds like Herrmann.
Rozsa sounds like Rozsa.
Rosenman sounds like Rosenman.
... and so and so forth ...

... however, if I played for you the Digitmovies CD of SEDDOK & LYCANTHROPUS, I don't think you'd ever peg the composer of both as being Armando Trovajoli (that's my guess smile ). Trovajoli's early 1960s genre items (most of which hasn't been released until 2014) do not sound like AT's bossa-nova / lounge numbers from the late-'60s and early 1970s for which AT is known.

There's plenty of other examples, I'm sure, so I wouldn't cite Jerry Goldsmith as the most chameleon-like. Rather, Goldsmith is a chameleon composer with high profile/recognition amongst soundtrack collectors.

Contrast Carlo Savina's URSUS with his OMBRE ROVENTI. If you listen to IL DEMONIO, will you recognize the same Piero Piccioni who did THE TENTH VICTIM?

Ernest Gold's PRESSURE POINT does not resemble any other soundtrack Gold did both before and after.

Would you believe that the same guy who scored a jazzy Peter Sellers comedy (THE WRONG ARM OF THE LAW) also did Hammer's THE NANNY? Richard Rodney Bennett did 'em both - and more besides - in various chameleon-like modes.

It's also hard to peg that DANTON was scored by the same guy who did LE VOYAGE EN BALLON: Jean Prodromides.

I could go on, Onya, but I think I've given you enough to chew on. smile

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2014 - 12:21 PM   
 By:   Grecchus   (Member)

I think JG was able to forge thematic material for each film that had a unique identity. You could still latch onto his style but just about everything he did had contours following a different musical relief with each and every outing.

Tora, Tora, Tora is no less groundbreaking than Planet Of The Apes. Most of the score is an experiment in sound effects that create the atmosphere to hug the storyline. It relies on expert musicianship to hit complex and incredibly precise rhythmic timing cues. I never get tired of it because it has it's own quirkiness and manages to be it's own thing. It is full of eastern promise.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2014 - 12:24 PM   
 By:   Thor   (Member)

I don't know if you can objectively tag any one particular film composer as "best" or "most versatile". Goldsmith is certainly in the running for that title though and would be my pick. Part of the reason for that is that I think his style evolved over the course of his career more than many other composers, giving a range of sounds even for similar movies scored decades apart. If you listen to his work chronologically though, there are noticeable similarities, particularly in the last decade of his career.

Chris


I agree with Chris. It's terribly difficult or perhaps even impossible to quantify the degree of versatility unless one clearly defines what one is looking for -- are we talking most diverse films (genres, types of expressions etc.)? Are we talking most diverse musical styles regardless of genres? Are we talking most versatile in terms of adapting to new technologies and trends?

I think most film composers NEED to have some sense of versatility -- unless one specializes so much in one particular sound (and slight variations thereof) that it becomes one's trademark. Like Cliff Martinez.

Goldsmith was certainly versatile in several meanings of the word, but I refuse to quantify it.

In terms of genres and musical styles, I also admire the versatility of Michael Kamen, Basil Poledouris, Hans Zimmer, John Williams, Danny Elfman and a great many others.

If I REALLY had to choose some composers who were INSANELY versatile in their output, I would say Michel Colombier and Vladimir Cosma:

http://filmscoremonthly.com/board/posts.cfm?threadID=98169&forumID=1&archive=0

By the way, I made a somewhat similar topic ages ago called "Consistent Versatility", but I can't find it anywhere. But there's Joan's thread from 2009 about the same topic:

http://www.filmscoremonthly.com/board/posts.cfm?threadID=64755&forumID=1&archive=0

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2014 - 2:48 PM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

I agree with Jon Burlingame who I believe has said that few film composers could get under the skin of a movie better than Goldsmith and connect with it emotionally. In that, Goldsmith was not only versatile, he was a genius. He's going to be forever missed.

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2014 - 3:30 PM   
 By:   judy the hutt   (Member)

No offence but unless you have heard almost the entire repertoire of a composer it is hard to determine. I have listened to almost all of John Williams music from Heartbeeps to Missouri Breaks to Sleepers to CE3K and beyond. There is a diversity all around. I do not know all of Mr. Goldsmith's music so cannot answer but what I do know of the Music of Mr. Williams I can say he was hell of a versatile composer.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2014 - 5:37 PM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)



Tonerow, you mention some composers I am unfamiliar with.

However, I am very immersed in the Italian composers.

The fact that a composer writes a light bossa next to a full throttle orchestral work does not mean that I cannot recognize similar stylistic motifs common between the two. I realize that not everyone has this ability.

So, I stand by my original question.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2014 - 5:41 PM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)

...what I do know of the Music of Mr. Williams I can say he was hell of a versatile composer.

I do not know much by him. The nature of the films he scored and directors he worked with never inspired me to check him out.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2014 - 6:30 PM   
 By:   Rozsaphile   (Member)

Yes. I can't answer for those indefatigable Italians, but I'd say that Goldsmith showed mastery of a wider range of musical styles and dramatic approaches than any other Hollywood composer. And some of his music is very good indeed.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.