Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Dec 3, 2017 - 3:24 PM   
 By:   LordDalek   (Member)

Nor do I think that 'sloppily made" is fair.

Fine. How about "glorified workprint" because that's EXACTLY what the original '79 theatrical was. A film with unfinished effects, unfinished titles, choppy editing, and honest to god splice marks that are still there on the blu-ray!

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 3, 2017 - 3:53 PM   
 By:   ceb   (Member)

STAR TREK: THE MOTION PICTURE is my unapologetic favorite of all the Trek films, and I also rank it as the finest of the Trek film scores -- all other composers and generations included. Furthermore, I've always had a huge affection for STAR TREK V, which I think is a flawed but nonetheless essential entry in the Trek canon -- I love the film it's trying so hard to be, and it's peppered with wonderful character moments that carry through the various stumbles and gaffes. Combine them with the utterly magnificent Jerry Goldsmith scores, and these are actually the two of the original six films that I am most likely to revisit!

Perfectly sums it up for me! Nuff said.


Me too.


me, three - and to almost quote Shatner, Goldsmith for the music!

 
 Posted:   Dec 3, 2017 - 4:03 PM   
 By:   Adam.   (Member)

There's no amount of money you could pay me to watch Star Trek V again. I detest the film. There's a reason why Shatner never directed another movie.

I do have a copy of the Director's Cut DVD of ST-TMP in my film library. I think it's an improvement over the theatrical version but I still can't say I like the film. I watch it every now and then because it does have some great stuff in it (score, visual effects, a few random scenes) but I still can't recommend it if I were a film critic.

That said, I'm still glad they were made just as they are because there was something in them that inspired Goldsmith to write two fantastic scores.

I think of Treks 2,3,4 and 6 as the Trek Quadrilogy.

 
 Posted:   Dec 3, 2017 - 7:49 PM   
 By:   Trent B   (Member)

I like Star Trek The Motion Picture both film and score. I can see why a lot of people don't like the film after a bit.

For Star Trek V, I really love the score. For the film I really like it until the point of the Great Barrier. That's where the movie shoots itself in the foot and just ruins it.

 
 Posted:   Dec 3, 2017 - 10:02 PM   
 By:   Jeyl   (Member)

TMP and I have a very awkward relationship. It's the one Star Trek movie I watch the most but it's one of the weakest entries in the whole franchise. I just... Gah! Every criticism aimed at the film is true, but I can't stop watching and enjoying it! The score is so grand, the visuals so epic. But what exactly does this film accomplish? I don't know.

One gripe that is seldom mentioned is that Spock is given the most to do even when it's not necessary. Now I know what you're thinking. "People want to see Spock do awesome stuff! He's the iconic character!" Sure, but what about the other characters? Take the scene where the Enterprise is attacked by the V'Ger cloud. You have a moment that deals with communications and the person who handles it and saves the day... IS NOT UHURA. Really? First you let Spock take over Scotty's job at fixing the warp engines, now he's taking over Uhura's job at communications? And I thought JJ's Trek09 treatment of Uhura was bad. I know we must establish that Spock has a connection to V'Ger, but this could have been so much better. Like have Spock detect that V'Ger was attempting to communicate telepathically and have Uhura be the one to confirm it and send the signal.

Speaking of treating the non-central characters of TOS like garbage, Star Trek V. So you're telling me that after taking away some 'pain' that these characters have it automatically means they'll turn on Kirk? No. Two movies ago these same characters put their careers and lives to help Kirk in his mission to bring Spock to Vulcan, but one therapy session is enough to want to backstab him for a Vulcan they never met? No. Fudge no. That's stupid, out of character and completely disrespectful.

In my head canon, V never happened. I'm so happy VI makes that notion easy by not acknowledging anything from V at all.

 
 Posted:   Dec 3, 2017 - 10:12 PM   
 By:   Zoragoth   (Member)

STAR TREK: THE MOTION PICTURE is my unapologetic favorite of all the Trek films, and I also rank it as the finest of the Trek film scores -- all other composers and generations included. Furthermore, I've always had a huge affection for STAR TREK V, which I think is a flawed but nonetheless essential entry in the Trek canon -- I love the film it's trying so hard to be, and it's peppered with wonderful character moments that carry through the various stumbles and gaffes. Combine them with the utterly magnificent Jerry Goldsmith scores, and these are actually the two of the original six films that I am most likely to revisit!

Perfectly sums it up for me! Nuff said.


Me too.


me, three - and to almost quote Shatner, Goldsmith for the music!


And me, four.

 
 Posted:   Dec 4, 2017 - 5:10 AM   
 By:   Josh "Swashbuckler" Gizelt   (Member)

The thing of it is that TMP is markedly different from the other films in that it is primarily science fiction about big ideas. This is reflected in the score, which is a score about high concepts and big ideas. Goldsmith illustrates the expansive world of the 23rd Century, the immense threat and enigma of V'Ger, the Klingon culture (most takes on these characters have taken their cues from his work on this score), and the love story, such as it is, of Decker and Ilia, with Ilia's theme inextricably linked to that of V'Ger, foreshadowing what is to come.

The film series became much more action/adventure oriented after the first film, which contributed immensely to the success of the franchise, but meant that the science fiction element was significantly lessened in future installments. This in and of itself isn't so awful — the series could veer from subgenre to subgenre, that was part of its “anthology series with continuing characters) design — but unfortunately it also meant that the Trek movies have often (though not always) followed a more aggressive path and been a lot less concept-driven than perhaps they could have been.*

The fifth film itself, despite its lofty aspirations, ended up being a much more conventional adventure movie, and so the score itself ends up being a much more conventional adventure score of the type Goldsmith was doing at the time. As such, I do enjoy it, but, as the tagline says, “There is no comparison.”

________________________________________________________________
* The TNG movies suffered more from this than the TOS films did, in my opinion, as there was always more of an action element to TOS, and the TOS movies did other genres, such as a comedy (TVH) and political thriller/prison picture (TUC), adding much more variety to their features.

 
 Posted:   Dec 4, 2017 - 8:14 AM   
 By:   other tallguy   (Member)

TMP and I have a very awkward relationship. It's the one Star Trek movie I watch the most but it's one of the weakest entries in the whole franchise. I just... Gah! Every criticism aimed at the film is true, but I can't stop watching and enjoying it! The score is so grand, the visuals so epic. But what exactly does this film accomplish? I don't know.

One gripe that is seldom mentioned is that Spock is given the most to do even when it's not necessary. Now I know what you're thinking. "People want to see Spock do awesome stuff! He's the iconic character!" Sure, but what about the other characters? Take the scene where the Enterprise is attacked by the V'Ger cloud. You have a moment that deals with communications and the person who handles it and saves the day... IS NOT UHURA. Really? First you let Spock take over Scotty's job at fixing the warp engines, now he's taking over Uhura's job at communications? And I thought JJ's Trek09 treatment of Uhura was bad. I know we must establish that Spock has a connection to V'Ger, but this could have been so much better. Like have Spock detect that V'Ger was attempting to communicate telepathically and have Uhura be the one to confirm it and send the signal.

That's funny, because The Changeling did the exact same scene as a ping pong between Spock and Uhura. Uhura did the "communications" and Spock did the "science".

Of course at the time of TMP it was three and half guys (Scotty) and a bunch of regular extras. (Hell, Uhura has more to do in TMP than she does in TWOK!)

And as said: TMP is one of two amazing Star Trek films (with TWOK being the other one). The others range from really good to pretty bad.

I'm not sure Star Trek V is THE worst (including TNG and JJ) but I won't argue against it.

And the score to TMP is one of the greatest scores ever. (Sorry, I may have just summed up most posts before mine.)

 
 Posted:   Dec 4, 2017 - 9:04 AM   
 By:   Justin Boggan   (Member)

Speaking of To Start a Nerd War...


"Star Trek V: The Final Frontier" is a better film than "Star Trek: Nemesis". Score wise, too.

 
 Posted:   Dec 4, 2017 - 9:22 AM   
 By:   other tallguy   (Member)

Speaking of To Start a Nerd War...


"Star Trek V: The Final Frontier" is a better film than "Star Trek: Nemesis". Score wise, too.

It's a valid argument.

 
 Posted:   Dec 4, 2017 - 9:47 AM   
 By:   Jeyl   (Member)

The film series became much more action/adventure oriented after the first film, which contributed immensely to the success of the franchise, but meant that the science fiction element was significantly lessened in future installments.

If TMP is a reflection of what future Star Trek films were going to be, I'm glad it got phased out. That's not saying the science fiction element of TMP was the problem. No. The problem was bad execution by spending a lot of time doing nothing. We spend more time looking at our characters looking at things than actually developing a story. Visual effects and score should compliment the story and the characters, not the other way around.

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 4, 2017 - 9:56 AM   
 By:   panavision   (Member)

I like TMP, but its script is so pedestrian.
The whole subplot between Decker and Ilia takes away from the protagonist Captain Kirk. The love story should have been a three-way relationship. The movie is not even about Kirk.

Thank god for Meyer, Trek's best writer by far. He made it about Kirk.

I love all the scores, but 1 and 5 are fantastic. The genius of Goldsmith was how he could make the scores sound epic yet intimate.

 
 Posted:   Dec 4, 2017 - 9:58 AM   
 By:   Jeyl   (Member)

I'm not sure Star Trek V is THE worst (including TNG and JJ) but I won't argue against it.

The film did almost kill the franchise had it not been for the 25th anniversary afterwards. If you ask me, Nemesis gets the rank as the worst Star Trek film. Not for actually killing the franchise, not for being a joyless journey that was supposed to be fun, not for doing an Austin Powers 'Doctor Evil' schtick complete with clones and certainly NOT for forgetting that Picard has an artificial heart (Seriously, you had your perfect 'the events of one's life shapes who they are' example right there!).

No. Nemesis is the worst because it features a three-way mind rape of Troi. Rick Berman, who was with Star Trek since the beginning of TNG thought this was a good idea. FUDGE THAT NOISE.

 
 Posted:   Dec 4, 2017 - 10:00 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

The film series became much more action/adventure oriented after the first film, which contributed immensely to the success of the franchise, but meant that the science fiction element was significantly lessened in future installments.

If TMP is a reflection of what future Star Trek films were going to be, I'm glad it got phased out. That's not saying the science fiction element of TMP was the problem. No. The problem was bad execution by spending a lot of time doing nothing. We spend more time looking at our characters looking at things than actually developing a story. Visual effects and score should compliment the story and the characters, not the other way around.


Some critic or insider said the effects were the Tail Wagging the Dog. Granted the film spent a lot of time of visuals, but there were some pretty good character moments. Kirk's whole story arc was about taking command for selfish reasons and how rusty and ill prepared he was for command. Spock was trying to find inner peace. The rest of the cast are just kinda there, but they were always meant to be supporting cast. This is not to say the script couldn't be more focused and tighter. But I think the film gets short shafted regarding character building.

 
 Posted:   Dec 5, 2017 - 5:23 AM   
 By:   Josh "Swashbuckler" Gizelt   (Member)

If TMP is a reflection of what future Star Trek films were going to be, I'm glad it got phased out. That's not saying the science fiction element of TMP was the problem. No. The problem was bad execution by spending a lot of time doing nothing. We spend more time looking at our characters looking at things than actually developing a story. Visual effects and score should compliment the story and the characters, not the other way around.

I'm not saying that future installments should have been like TMP — after all, TWOK is not only my favorite Trek feature, but one of my favorite movies of all time — but there is a certain amount of throwing out the baby with the bathwater in terms of the BIG IDEAS that TMP aspired to; if it didn't quite achieve its ambitions because of the complete disaster that was the production of that film (including the pre- and post-). And while I think the 2000 cut is an improvement, it doesn't really solve all of the movie's problems.

The irony is, of course, that TFF is almost as ambitious in concept as TMP, but the high concept and low comedy don't always mix well, and William Shatner.

BUT… TMP is the only one of the Trek films to be deliberately majestic.

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 5, 2017 - 8:15 AM   
 By:   paulhickling   (Member)

Count me as another never to have understood the downer STtMP gets. Loved on first viewing and still do. The score is as we know awesome. And there's much to enjoy catching up with the old crew. I didn't have a problem with TFF and was pleased to hear Jerry's great music again.

This is quite a timely thread for me because I looked in on the animated series on Netflix last night, and watched about three episodes. Not seen it since the 70s, and I wrote to the BBC's official tv guide - Radio Times - in 1973 asking for it to shown after seeing the premier episode whilst on holiday in Canada as a mere 12 year old.

I happened to watch an episode called One of Our Planets is Missing. WTF?! A cloud going around eating planets? Totally (as we say in the UK) gobsmacked. I've always seen The Ultimate Computer and The Doomsday Machine mentioned in the same breath as TMP, but this was a shocking first for me. What's more I got to the third website before anyone mentioned the connection.

Not to mention that damn cartoon music is playing in my head all the time now!

 
 Posted:   Dec 5, 2017 - 8:43 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Count me as another never to have understood the downer STtMP gets. Loved on first viewing and still do. The score is as we know awesome. And there's much to enjoy catching up with the old crew. I didn't have a problem with TFF and was pleased to hear Jerry's great music again.

This is quite a timely thread for me because I looked in on the animated series on Netflix last night, and watched about three episodes. Not seen it since the 70s, and I wrote to the BBC's official tv guide - Radio Times - in 1973 asking for it to shown after seeing the premier episode whilst on holiday in Canada as a mere 12 year old.

I happened to watch an episode called One of Our Planets is Missing. WTF?! A cloud going around eating planets? Totally (as we say in the UK) gobsmacked. I've always seen The Ultimate Computer and The Doomsday Machine mentioned in the same breath as TMP, but this was a shocking first for me. What's more I got to the third website before anyone mentioned the connection.

Not to mention that damn cartoon music is playing in my head all the time now!


You want a WTF episode. Watch/read up on Star Trek the animated series episode, "Magicks of Megas Tu"!

http://www.danhausertrek.com/AnimatedSeries/Mtu.html
http://www.startrek.com/article/one-trek-mind-the-not-so-magic-magicks-of-megas-tu

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 5, 2017 - 10:04 AM   
 By:   Rnelson   (Member)

I love TMP and it does indeed have one of the greatest scores in history. But it is a slog to get through. The reason it has probably gotten more love over the years is that, as mentioned, it has scale and truly captures the mystery of deep space encounter and exploration. At least that's what I like most about it anyway. Trek V (lovely score and a welcome return of Goldsmith to the series) is so cheap (bargain basement effects ad all) and cheesy that I can't really enjoy it very much.

And as much as I love TWOK I find it unfortunate that it set Star Trek features forever on "the Captain vs the vengeful maniac villain" template. On that point TMP really stands out as a refreshment.

 
 Posted:   Dec 5, 2017 - 10:12 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

I love TMP and it does indeed have one of the greatest scores in history. But it is a slog to get through. The reason it has probably gotten more love over the years is that, as mentioned, it has scale and truly captures the mystery of deep space encounter and exploration. At least that's what I like most about it anyway. Trek V (lovely score and a welcome return of Goldsmith to the series) is so cheap (bargain basement effects ad all) and cheesy that I can't really enjoy it very much.

And as much as I love TWOK I find it unfortunate that it set Star Trek features forever on "the Captain vs the vengeful maniac villain" template. On that point TMP really stands out as a refreshment.


My favorites are TMP, WOK, Voyage Home. All very enjoyable for what they were meant to be. I think TFF captured the essence of the TOS characters better than any of the films though.

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 5, 2017 - 10:24 AM   
 By:   Rnelson   (Member)

I love TMP and it does indeed have one of the greatest scores in history. But it is a slog to get through. The reason it has probably gotten more love over the years is that, as mentioned, it has scale and truly captures the mystery of deep space encounter and exploration. At least that's what I like most about it anyway. Trek V (lovely score and a welcome return of Goldsmith to the series) is so cheap (bargain basement effects ad all) and cheesy that I can't really enjoy it very much.

And as much as I love TWOK I find it unfortunate that it set Star Trek features forever on "the Captain vs the vengeful maniac villain" template. On that point TMP really stands out as a refreshment.


My favorites are TMP, WOK, Voyage Home. All very enjoyable for what they were meant to be. I think TFF captured the essence of the TOS characters better than any of the films though.


The Campfire stuff with the bromantic three in TFF is the best, but other characters were mishandled with Uhura coming out the worst. That naked dance routine and that silly little romantic exchange between her and Scotty being particularly awkward.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.