Well you come storming onto this board with a recycled thread whose sole purpose appears to slander Zimmer fans (and Hans) as tone deaf no nothings who only like DUNKIRK because we cant discern good music from bad. In your view the only reason we like the score is because we "like anything" with Zimmer's name on it. Now i don't care if you insult me. I can take it. But.when you disparage Tall Guy - our wise Lord- you go to far sir!!!!!#
Well you come storming onto this board with a recycled thread whose sole purpose appears to slander Zimmer fans (and Hans) as tone deaf no nothings who only like DUNKIRK because we cant discern good music from bad. In your view the only reason we like the score is because we "like anything" with Zimmer's name on it. Now i don't care if you insult me. I can take it. But.when you disparage Tall Guy - our wise Lord- you go to far sir!!!!!#
I am not "slandering" anyone...YOU slandered ME! You basically accused me of being a paedophile because I expressed an opinion! "Tall Guy" made his point but I DON'T agree with him and I don't like it when someone alludes to me "not being able to understand". I find that VERY condescending! By all means disagree with my POV but keep your comments on the opinions and don't play the man!
As to not liking Mr. Zimmer's music...that's my right. I did not slander him...I simply do not like his style. You like it, that's fine. One man's meat and all that...but I strongly recommend you refrain from making the sorts of comments you did. You thought you were being funny. That sort of thing is NOT funny! And, fyi, I DID use the search function and found no thread corresponding to what I wanted to write. Understand?
Now I remember why I only visit here rarely. It's because of people LIKE YOU!
Those of us who appreciate Nolan’s unique film will understand if you decide to watch the film in your own way.
On another note, how did you decide on your user name?
Oh my...another "oh YOU could never understand it" type! "Stroppy" amply signifies how I feel about snooty types who are so up themselves that they can't see the bird droppings hitting their head.
That is just you expressing your ,"opinion,,"? If u say so.
Those of us who appreciate Nolan’s unique film will understand if you decide to watch the film in your own way.
On another note, how did you decide on your user name?
Oh my...another "oh YOU could never understand it" type! "Stroppy" amply signifies how I feel about snooty types who are so up themselves that they can't see the bird droppings hitting their head.
That is just you expressing your ,"opinion,,"? If u say so.
Yep...after his use of the "Oh YOU could never understand" comment. Condescension is not debate, it's a subtle form of attack.
I notice you do not mention the fact that you made a truly disgusting dig at me. You are a disgrace!
By the way...learn about superlatives... ie: the difference between "to" and "too"
A person who is sexually attracted to children. Origin 1940s: from paedo- + -phile. Pronunciation paedophile/'pi?d?(?)f??l/
ENGLISH Oxford Living Dictionary.
You keep digging yourself into a hole. I'm waiting for an apology I know will never come. Your comment was disgraceful, uncalled for and showing a true lack of taste and education.
Those of us who appreciate Nolan’s unique film will understand if you decide to watch the film in your own way.
On another note, how did you decide on your user name?
Oh my...another "oh YOU could never understand it" type! "Stroppy" amply signifies how I feel about snooty types who are so up themselves that they can't see the bird droppings hitting their head.
You do seem determined to misunderstand. I suggested a way to watch the film that might make you happier, and said that those people who like it the way it is will be cool with it. I’d say that’s the opposite of what you inferred.
And not being a fan of Matt Monro is a poor excuse for getting his name wrong - a film music “connoisseur” should be very familiar with his work of the 60s and 70s. I’m not the world’s biggest fan of Elan Ishk.... Ilan Ekshe.... Jerry Goldsmith, but I know how to spell his name.
Those of us who appreciate Nolan’s unique film will understand if you decide to watch the film in your own way.
On another note, how did you decide on your user name?
Oh my...another "oh YOU could never understand it" type! "Stroppy" amply signifies how I feel about snooty types who are so up themselves that they can't see the bird droppings hitting their head.
You do seem determined to misunderstand. I suggested a way to watch the film that might make you happier, and said that those people who like it the way it is will be cool with it. I’d say that’s the opposite of what you inferred.
And not being a fan of Matt Monro is a poor excuse for getting his name wrong - a film music “connoisseur” should be very familiar with his work of the 60s and 70s. I’m not the world’s biggest fan of Elan Ishk.... Ilan Ekshe.... Jerry Goldsmith, but I know how to spell his name.
Oh BULLCRAP! You knew exactly what you were on about! As to Mr. Monro...you are nitpicking a bit, yes? Perhaps my posts have caused your imagined serenity to slip slightly? And no defence for the other gent's paedophile jibe...surely I misunderstood that as well (sigh, smirk)! As to Monro...never liked his music and it figured only slightly in SOME films. But you know this. Of course, you are tailoring the debate to suit your defence. I find this interesting and amusing. Pray continue...
"Sexting teenagers" would be classed as a indictable offence in my country. Ergo, anyone doing such a thing would be branded a paedophile. I added this comment so as to educate you, Marshall. I assume, though, that you are frantically back-pedalling so as to show that you didn't mean this at all. Sure you didn't!
Relax Stroppy. Believe me, no one on this board mistook my joke for a serious accusation. No apology necessary.
You do NOT joke about such things to ME. That subject does not warrant humour! Having been a victim of that sort of behaviour I find any such allusion truly insulting. (That's "allusion"...look it up) I am waiting for an apology.
You just need to read my initial message with more care. SBD was far more patronising than you think I was, but I don’t hold you responsible for what he said and presumably you fail to mention that fact because he agrees with you. I think you’re just looking for offence, when all that was offered was friendly DEfence of a different opinion.
