Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
This is a comments thread about Blog Post: Seriously, Are There Too Many CDs? by Lukas Kendall
 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 5:52 PM   
 By:   Warlok   (Member)

What would people think about us converting 3000-unit limited editions into 5000, 8000 or 10000-copy editions?

Lukas


From my perspective, I collect music CDs because I infinitely prefer physical media and because I love the music which I endeavour to collect. So for me, the primary concern is allowing everyone who wants the music a fair chance to get it.

Perhaps somewhere someone out there may be disheartened by the decrease in resale value for their investment (?) if you were to increase print runs, but not I.

It may be worth noting that Trent Reznor, of Nine Inch Nails fame, has his own label (Null Corporation) which offers The Social Network - among other music - for digital download, digital download plus physical CD, and special deluxe packages. The mp3s/oggs are lossless and may be played anywhere anytime, to the best of my knowledge. He got tired of the limitations on his art imposed by the regular distribution channels (i.e the heads of those labels) and struck out on his own that way. I snagged the physical CD version, allowing me to indulge in the download immediately until my disc arrives.

I am pleased by such arrangements, as sometimes I wish to *quickly* listen to a piece of music, when I do not or cannot (when away with my laptop) easily access the disc. The conversion process is already done for me, yet without being at the expense of my proper CD copy.

 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 5:52 PM   
 By:   calbuth7   (Member)

I like the idea of the pre-order system.
Regarding the download option, it would have to be lossless or I would not buy it.
If you say that there is a demand for higher editions for some titles, go ahead.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 5:57 PM   
 By:   Marcato   (Member)

I'm more or less happy with the way things are, but I could see how things could get difficult if all labels worked the Intrada/Kritzerland/Varese way. I wouldn't even mind to miss out on one or another interesting title, if digital downloads were a real alternative. But as long as we don't get lossless downloads it isn't.


with so many releases small labels like KRITZER would easily go down if they did not invest in scores that would give them money


and with no deal between the labels as to when they can annonce and release SPECIAL-RELEASES i say it is a risky situation - one that has paid out well but that's not going to last forever - within the few years we've seen labels like PERCEPTO going down - it will happen again and only the major labels like VARESE, INTRADA, FSM, LA LA will have a chance of surviving since they have the money to say 5000 units for a limited post.

so yes - there are wau too many CD'S released if you don't want labels to turn the key around.

 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 6:03 PM   
 By:   James Goldstein   (Member)

I agree with the others -- demolish the idea of having the number it's limited to attached to the product, and press only handfuls at a time based on individual demand. Problem solved. It's something all the labels should do. Get the consumer focused on the music, again, not the comic-book collecting mentality for which has clearly taken over.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 6:07 PM   
 By:   Marcato   (Member)

What would people think about us converting 3000-unit limited editions into 5000, 8000 or 10000-copy editions?

Lukas



if there are a market - inside and outside the filmmusic fan world- for it then it would be great - i like the preorder idea - BUT you could do it as a poll instead where you would as how many that would buy this cd - then there would be yes and no - you have all the yes voters to give you a hint about how many copies there should be made


the bad thing about this - you might sell out and people would miss it out - OR people might just not have the money - or other reasons - and do not buy it.


For examble - how many percent has buyed OTLAND - vs TOOTSIE -

is it composer or is it because they want the music ?


Jerry goldsmith is usually a good seller

so is JW and Horner.

 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 6:15 PM   
 By:   gmontag451   (Member)

Hmmm... downloads. You could hide a serial number somewhere in the data and figure out who's sharing your releases online....

Michael

 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 6:15 PM   
 By:   James Goldstein   (Member)

What would people think about us converting 3000-unit limited editions into 5000, 8000 or 10000-copy editions?

Lukas


Is the demand there?


YES.

lk


Wait -- how did we go from "too many CDs" to adding more supply? Am I missing something here?

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 6:22 PM   
 By:   quiller007   (Member)

I'm confused over this issue, too. First you say you are thinking of cutting
way back from 3000 unts on a lot of FSM titles, because they aren't selling.
Then you ask if pumping up the volume of units to 8000 or 10,000 is
a better idea? I don't get it. If limited editions of 3000 cds aren't selling well,
why would 10,000?

Den

 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 6:24 PM   
 By:   SchiffyM   (Member)

If limited editions of 3000 cds aren't selling well, why would 10,000?

Well, I guess the right ones sell a lot, and most sell very few.

Which is why, again, it's hard to comment on a business I don't know.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 6:28 PM   
 By:   stan2   (Member)

I also appreciate that Mr. Kendall is soliciting our input.

I don't feel as though there are too many CDs issued. Having said that, I should also state that I am a very, shall we say, careful buyer where many CD issues are not really interesting to me. I have purchased FSM sets, however. Also, I don't (at present) have financial constraints on buying the CDs I want. These together may not make me representative of most people who buy these CDs.

Further, as has already been said, downloads are all too often lower-than-CD-quality sound. I want at least CD quality, if not better (DVD-A, SACD, etc.). Lowering sound quality for portable listening is a choice I want to make from a higher quality source I own, not one I want made for me.

However, this issue appears to be a continuation of a question that Mr. Kendall asked some years ago on how to expand the potential market. It seems to me, as an outsider who does not have "inside" information on the business of producing these CDs with their attendant costs, licenses, agreements, etc., that this is the core issue. All the CDs issued are being "peddled" to pretty much the same group of buyers.

I know that at the time the original question was asked, FSM tried to expand into a broader market, apparently without success. Further, major labels that sought to cash in on the interest in classic films by selling classic film music also seem to have backed away from this market. (Although Sony/BMG has jumped in again by re-issuing some of the Classic Film Score series. Wonder how those are selling.)

I really don't have any answers here, but I do have a suggestion. If it has not been tried already, how do players in other niche markets in other similar areas survive? Publishing, for example. Are their niches larger than this one? If it has been tried, has anything useful been learned?

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 6:34 PM   
 By:   Great Escape   (Member)

Outside of speculators who are looking to make money off them, do people really buy them BECAUSE they want limited editions or do they race to get them before they sell out because they do not want to miss out on limited editions. If primarily the latter, then not repressing past limited editions makes no sense and not making available what the market will bear makes no sense. As long as the demand is there, go for it. If it isn't, scale back.

 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 6:39 PM   
 By:   James Goldstein   (Member)

Outside of speculators who are looking to make money off them, do people really buy them BECAUSE they want limited editions or do they race to get them before they sell out because they do want to miss out on limited editions. If primarily the latter, then not repressing past limited editions makes no sense and not making available what the market will bear makes not sense. As long as the demand is there, go for it. If it isn't, scale back.

Interesting points.

The reason why so many people are pirating these things is because they're sold out and no one wants to pay hundreds of dollars for their favorite(s). Why not re-issue the popular titles? Go for another 1,000 or 2000 units, or whatever the demand may call for. It's your money you're sitting on, and it's just ridiculous to play this I-got-it-and-you-don't game. You'll lose a lot of money like that. Ask Intrada about this in regards to Predator or Inchon... and many others.

 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 6:40 PM   
 By:   Adam.   (Member)

I really like the idea of taking pre-orders. I would be much more patient if I know for a fact that the score I have ordered is in production and will be delivered when ready, as opposed to reading rumors and wondering if something is coming out.

I love owning the physical CD. I like liner notes as much as anyone, but could do without them. Perhaps FSM could save significant production and shipping costs by producing only the disc(s), plus the front and back cover art. Simply ship the CD and covers sandwiched between two pieces of cardboard allowing customers to insert the covers in their own jewel case. Publish the liner notes on the website. That way people like me will still be happy to get the CD and the labels will cut costs by not printing liner notes and not providing jewel cases. I could live with that.

 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 6:47 PM   
 By:   James Goldstein   (Member)

Okay...

Too many CDs? Nope. That's not the problem; Too many secrets? Yes. People are hibernating in the corner, clenching their dollars in their fists, afraid of what these labels may surprise them with. Bottom line: Put up with the aggravation, and allow your tiny market to plan ahead -- their hard-earned dollars deserve a little -- just a little -- information. I cannot tell you how many times I've read this "pre-order" type of request, or announcements. In the end, it's best to give the consumer what they want. Give them excuses, they'll turn their eyes elsewhere, if only to look at the things that are coming their way.

 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 6:51 PM   
 By:   Lukas Kendall   (Member)


Um...what if we ALREADY overpressed some titles?

And have been chicken to confess for years?

Would you forgive us? And by us, I mean me, as this was my fault?

Lukas

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 6:52 PM   
 By:   Ag^Janus   (Member)

There are too many and not enough.

 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 6:55 PM   
 By:   James Goldstein   (Member)

Um...what if we ALREADY overpressed some titles?

And have been chicken to confess for years?

Would you forgive us? And by us, I mean me, as this was my fault?

Lukas


Just release them. Who cares? I, for one, would love to see that music on shelves of those yearning for it, and money in your dry pockets. It's almost a silly question.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 7:04 PM   
 By:   Ag^Janus   (Member)

I think I would forgive anyone for an honest mistake.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 7:10 PM   
 By:   Chris Avis   (Member)

Um...what if we ALREADY overpressed some titles?

And have been chicken to confess for years?

Would you forgive us? And by us, I mean me, as this was my fault?

Lukas


I think most would be willing to forgive provided you sold them for what the original selling price was and not what the eBay speculators were asking.

Chris.

 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2010 - 7:14 PM   
 By:   Lukas Kendall   (Member)

I think I would forgive anyone for an honest mistake.

Oh, it was very deliberate.

Every so often there's a thread, how come Logan's Run never sold out?

Remember that episode of Star Trek where the Talosians make the crew think they didn't phaser off the top of the mountain?

Or something like that.

Lukas

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.