 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
He's a MAIN producer and a screenwriter!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plus he's EVERYWHERE in the worldwide marketing campaign (hardly "just the screenwriter"...)
exactly!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Producer is more powerful than director !
And he's a producer and a screenwriter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The score is a remix of "Brothers In Arms" track from Fury Road..
This guy is Uwe Boll of film music 
If Mad Max has choir...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posted: |
Dec 11, 2018 - 7:48 AM
|
|
|
|
By: |
Thor
(Member)
|
film director, screenwriters, casting, production designer, cinematographer, editor, visual FX... all this crew come from Peter Jackson's LOTR, HOBBIT and KONG films. And he got the book rights 10 years ago
I think the man IS quite involved , dont know why you prefer to blame the invisible "suits" first
Because it makes no sense to put all the blame on a guy who didn't direct the film, or when you consider the wheels that are in motion for creating a blockbuster like this, with all the considerations for target audience, money on the table etc.
There is nothing wrong with Jackson's screenplay. If he has any blame, it would be that he didn't 'supervise' the realization of that screenplay more thouroughly as one of several producers. That's it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: |
Dec 11, 2018 - 4:53 PM
|
|
|
|
By: |
SchiffyM
(Member)
|
Yeah, I know. We disagree on the degree of blame here. If anything, Jackson is "third in line" as far as blame is concerned, IMO.
You'll forgive me, but I think this is a silly game. Why does "blame" affect the movie? The movie works for you or it doesn't. If you financed the film, maybe you look for who to blame, so you don't make the same mistake. But why should we?
In my opinion, only obsessive fans look to deflect blame from their favorite filmmakers, because they want to believe them incapable of failing otherwise. But all great filmmakers misstep. Hitchcock, Chaplin, Fellini, Spielberg, Polanski… I could go on and on, they've made brilliant films but they've also blown it sometimes. That's because they're human beings, and they take chances, and films are complicated animals and sometimes they just don't come out they way you'd hoped.
Can I blame Jackson for the dreary "Hobbit" movies? How about "King Kong," or "The Lovely Bones"?
Honestly, it's a knee jerk response to blame those imagined "suits" who meddled in what would surely have been brilliance. I get it – in my job in television, I deal with suits every day. And sometimes they're destructive (in my opinion), and other times they help, and more often than not, they're just a nuisance.
But come on. Even Willie Mays dropped the ball sometimes. Doesn't mean he wasn't a great baseball player.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm listen the score and by far, one of the best by Tom
Beautiful choir, heavy action and themes (that Terminator-esque theme for Shrike with that emotional spin or Hester's theme and his variations in Shan Guo, is gorgeous)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
