Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 10:24 AM   
 By:   Mike West   (Member)

I have the feeling Giacchino's music could be way more sophisticated and greater with more time and less computers, there is a tendency of formalisms in his music sometimes.

(The following post is made about personal preference and makes no greater overture to quality or value of anything.)

On one hand, I agree with you. Something happened to Giacchino's music at some point (the first Call Of Duty score comes to mind) where its become "sour" to my ears. Much more simple, much more lackadaisical and simply "comments action on the screen" instead of "emotionally resonating".

Goldsmith said you don't score the gallop of the horse, you score the fear of the rider. And Giacchino seems to do the opposite.

He still has some gems - John Carter and Speed Racer come to mind - but they still seem "thin". However, I think this has to do with simply being burned out writing so much music for Lost and then taking on movies and just having "little ink left in the pen". Every creative person hits that point where its just too damn much, you know?

And then, if you look at the scores you say "lack sophistication", they seem to be all by the same people, for the same genre, in a movie written in the same way. So I think the other thing is that Giacchino is giving those people exactly the kind of score they want... and it works as "movie music" and less as "music music".

I hope some of that makes sense.


Interesting point of view.
Not 'lack of sophistication', hard to say, there is a lot of sophistication. Every element could be more integrated with every other element. And sometimes for my taste there are not enough elements actually, could be more flesh around the bones.

 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 10:29 AM   
 By:   Erik Woods   (Member)

Thanks for that. You know, your first reaction was "rubbish", kind of not really polite and of thinking to have someone who does not know what he is talking about. Nice that we found to each other smile

I apologize for that. I wasn't trying to be rude. I reacted that way because I assumed (yeah I know) that you thought Giacchino was a keyboard pounder who let his computers do all of the work for him. Again, I'm sorry. But having known Giacchino for over 12 years I felt a need to defend him.

-Erik-

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 10:29 AM   
 By:   Hurdy Gurdy   (Member)

This debate reminds me of something I asked John Powell in Ubeda some years back.
He explained that most composers today use the computer for ease and speed and it's a magical box of tricks, but it has walls and limits. He said composers using this technique would always be composing within the restraints and confines of the box and the walls and scores composed within this technique would share a certain 'homogenised' sound.
He said composers (including himself) may need to break free of those chains and 'think outside the box' in order to write music in an unrestrained way.
I think this is what Mike is alluding to above in his posts about pen and pencil vs computers.
There was another thread here some years ago (started by Lukas Kendall if memory serves) about that very issue, pen/pencil vs computer).

 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 10:33 AM   
 By:   LeHah   (Member)

Not 'lack of sophistication', hard to say, there is a lot of sophistication. Every element could be more integrated with every other element. And sometimes for my taste there are not enough elements actually, could be more flesh around the bones.

I knew what you meant. The music is certainly sophisticated but its as if its "unfinished" or "doesn't quite get to where it needs to go emotionally".

Music is very hard to ascertain and break down logically. For me, anyway.

 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 10:34 AM   
 By:   Erik Woods   (Member)

Going to throw this one out there.

Could it be that Giacchino's music "sounds thin" because of the recording engineer?!

-Erik-

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 10:37 AM   
 By:   Mike West   (Member)

Thanks for that. You know, your first reaction was "rubbish", kind of not really polite and of thinking to have someone who does not know what he is talking about. Nice that we found to each other smile

I apologize for that. I wasn't trying to be rude. I reacted that way because I assumed (yeah I know) that you thought Giacchino was a keyboard pounder who let his computers do all of the work for him. Again, I'm sorry. But having known Giacchino for over 12 years I felt a need to defend him.

-Erik-


No problem, was not sure I could explain it really.

We are both huge fans of him, I think he is brillant doing an incredible job in an actually art-hostile and rather sound/music-design-oriented industry

 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 10:37 AM   
 By:   LeHah   (Member)

Could it be that Giacchino's music "sounds thin" because of the recording engineer?!

Thats a separate issue - by "thin", I meant the orchestrations were "less full" than, say, the first two Medal Of Honor games - but I should've been more clear.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 10:40 AM   
 By:   Mike West   (Member)

This debate reminds me of something I asked John Powell in Ubeda some years back.
He explained that most composers today use the computer for ease and speed and it's a magical box of tricks, but it has walls and limits. He said composers using this technique would always be composing within the restraints and confines of the box and the walls and scores composed within this technique would share a certain 'homogenised' sound.
He said composers (including himself) may need to break free of those chains and 'think outside the box' in order to write music in an unrestrained way.
I think this is what Mike is alluding to above in his posts about pen and pencil vs computers.
There was another thread here some years ago (started by Lukas Kendall if memory serves) about that very issue, pen/pencil vs computer).


Yes I remember that thread and posted there.
Very very interesting that what Powell said, and exactly what I also meant to say in better words

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 10:42 AM   
 By:   Mike West   (Member)

Not 'lack of sophistication', hard to say, there is a lot of sophistication. Every element could be more integrated with every other element. And sometimes for my taste there are not enough elements actually, could be more flesh around the bones.

I knew what you meant. The music is certainly sophisticated but its as if its "unfinished" or "doesn't quite get to where it needs to go emotionally".

Music is very hard to ascertain and break down logically. For me, anyway.


Right, unfinished! Not only emotionally, also speaking of structure and orchestration, though that is a matter of taste, time, scene etc....

 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 10:46 AM   
 By:   Shaun Rutherford   (Member)

Could it be that Giacchino's music "sounds thin" because of the recording engineer?!

Thats a separate issue - by "thin", I meant the orchestrations were "less full" than, say, the first two Medal Of Honor games - but I should've been more clear.


I think both are problems, really. Wallin is still doing Giacchino's stuff, right? Whatever the reason, it all sounds so treble-heavy (which apparently is all the rage in Japan?) that the action music just comes across as shrill and bangy (something I say every single time I mention Giacchino anymore).

 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 11:04 AM   
 By:   Jason LeBlanc   (Member)

Dan Wallin has recorded most of Giacchino scores, however Joel Iwataki is recording Star Trek Into Darkness.

http://instagram.com/p/WhoSN5FdgE/

 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 11:49 AM   
 By:   Shaun Rutherford   (Member)

(strokes beard)

 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 11:54 AM   
 By:   Maleficio   (Member)

I think it's fairly obvious that Giacchino likes his music to sound a certain way so I don't think a new recording engineer is going to change that.

 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 11:56 AM   
 By:   Jason LeBlanc   (Member)

If you listen to the videos that Giacchino has been tweeting from yesterday's recording sessions for the end credits, you can already hear the difference, actually.

Also, if you listen to Giacchino's pre-Wallin scores such as the Medal of Honor series, they sound DRASTICALLY different than the Wallin-era Giacchino.

 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 12:02 PM   
 By:   Maleficio   (Member)

If you listen to the videos that Giacchino has been tweeting from yesterday's recording sessions for the end credits, you can already hear the difference, actually.

Also, if you listen to Giacchino's pre-Wallin scores such as the Medal of Honor series, they sound DRASTICALLY different than the Wallin-era Giacchino.


A raw orchestra recording is not what you are going to hear on the album. And change of sound after Medal of Honor just shows that he liked Wallin's work and stuck with it.

 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 12:20 PM   
 By:   Shaun Rutherford   (Member)

If you listen to the videos that Giacchino has been tweeting from yesterday's recording sessions for the end credits, you can already hear the difference, actually.

Also, if you listen to Giacchino's pre-Wallin scores such as the Medal of Honor series, they sound DRASTICALLY different than the Wallin-era Giacchino.


Absolutely on the second point. The orchestra sounds warm and full on the Medal Of Honor scores.

 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 12:24 PM   
 By:   Erik Woods   (Member)

I think it's fairly obvious that Giacchino likes his music to sound a certain way so I don't think a new recording engineer is going to change that.

Yes, it will. Roar! (recorded by Peter Fuchs) sounds drastically different than anything Wallin has recorded for Giacchino. Giacchino choose Iwataki because Wallin wasn't available. Giacchino must have heard something he liked in Iwataki's previous recordings, whether a Tyler or Goldenthal recording, to bring him on board for this project. I'm willing to bet that this is going to sound much fuller and bigger than Giacchino's first Trek score.

A raw orchestra recording is not what you are going to hear on the album. And change of sound after Medal of Honor just shows that he liked Wallin's work and stuck with it.

Well, he had to pick someone because Steve Smith (who recorded Giacchino's MOH, Secret Weapons scores) is a Seattle based engineer. I'm sure he would have still worked with Smith if he lived in California. And if I'm not mistaken (I might be) Giacchino has also worked with Armin Steiner.

-Erik-

 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 12:36 PM   
 By:   Shaun Rutherford   (Member)

Someone should do a Kickstarter to move Steve Smith to L.A.

 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 12:52 PM   
 By:   Jason LeBlanc   (Member)

Fantasic post Erik, thank you for that insight.

 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2013 - 12:55 PM   
 By:   Erik Woods   (Member)

By the way, Steve Smith recorded Let Me In.

-Erik-

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.