 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posted: |
Aug 19, 2009 - 1:32 PM
|
|
|
|
By: |
mastadge
(Member)
|
If there were many CD's by one company with horrible quality like is being said, I can understand complaining, if it is one out of a 1000, then sometimes we just have to accept it.
If it's one out of 1000, it should be very easy for them to replace the offending discs.
As for your other points, they really have little to do with this. DVD Audio and SACD? No one's asking for that quality here. They're asking for their CDs to be CD quality, which really oughtn't to be too much to ask. And further, they're asking for accountability, rather than the professionals at the label just ignoring the situation and saying, "we stand by our work."
What if the next big blockbuster comes out next week, only the image quality looks as though it's been taped off an old VHS. The fans and critics call the studio out, and the studio glibly says, "we watched the movie again, and see no problem with it. We stand by our work," rather than sending corrected prints out to the theaters. How well do you think that movie performs at the box office?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My copy arrived today; I'm thirteen tracks in and I honestly can't hear any problems with it (and I've specifically been listening for just such a thing). It sounds perfectly fine to me. (I know, I was the one who couldn't spot reversed channels on THE FUGITIVE but then [1] I've never listened out for it and [2] such a thing wouldn't necessarily bother me in the way that cack sound quality would, and [3] I don't think it's such a great score anyway.  )
GI JOE is pretty damn good, by the way. If only there were a CD for A CHRISTMAS CAROL.... Oh well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
