Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Oct 30, 2007 - 11:45 AM   
 By:   Eric Paddon   (Member)

I wish Joe the best in whatever he does, but I do hope that someday he'll be willing to come back to take his proper place in Monument Park among the greatest of Yankees.

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 30, 2007 - 11:45 AM   
 By:   Sir_Simon_de_Canterville   (Member)

And if he were in his prime, and pitching today, he'd be the best pitcher in baseball. The fall-off in quality in the game, especially on the mound, from his day to ours is shocking.

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 30, 2007 - 6:03 PM   
 By:   ANZALDIMAN   (Member)

Jon Matlack....what a cutie!

Is that before or after Marty Perez bounced a line-drive off Matlack's forehead in 1973?


Before, during, and after. He's a cutie!





I'd take a Mets starting rotation of Seaver, Koosman, and Matlack (in their primes) any day of the week.





Jon Matlack was a very young pitcher at the time in the early 70's and had some very good seasons with the Mets.
His stats during his years with the Mets back that up.
He won NL Rookie of the Year honors in 1972 at the age of 22.



That was a great Mets starting 3 in the rotation back in the early 70's.

Seaver, Koosman, Matlack.

Names I've remembered since I was a kid in the early 70's and everytime I heard those names mentioned back then in that order I knew the Mets had quality in their starting rotation.

And indeed they did .

Matlack is now best known to baseball fans in general as the pitcher the late great Roberto Clemente of the Pirates got his 3000th hit off of before his tragic death.

Jon Matlack was traded away by the Mets in the late 70's to the Texas Rangers and had some good years there before retiring.



But I will always remember that distinctive high leg kick of his on the mound while wearing New York Mets uniform #32.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2007 - 12:03 AM   
 By:   ANZALDIMAN   (Member)

Gil Hodges, manager of the 1969 "Amazin'" Mets accepts the 1969 World Series Championship Trophy.

RIP Gil.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NMcrt9OtYE

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2007 - 12:20 AM   
 By:   ANZALDIMAN   (Member)

While we wait for the "official" announcement of Joe Torre becoming the next LA Dodgers manager, here's some minor hot stove news concerning the Mets.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/baseball/mlb/10/31/mets.alou.ap/index.html

 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2007 - 6:04 PM   
 By:   Eric Paddon   (Member)

I suspect that Torre's refusal to comment about coming back to the Stadium for a ceremony stemmed from the fact that he was already planning on managing somewhere else.

I have to say, the Dodgers handled this situation far more disgracefully than you can accuse Yankee management of how they handled the situation with Torre. Leaving Grady Little twisting in the wind that way was just plain wrong.

I expect Clint Hurdle to name Joe to the NL coaching staff for next year's All Star Game, which will finally give the Yankee Stadium faithful their chance to give Joe a proper goodbye, until the day when time will heal the wounds and he get his monument erected and his uniform number retired (I sincerely hope they aren't crazy enough to issue #6 to anyone else in the meantime).

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2007 - 10:54 PM   
 By:   JSWalsh   (Member)

I lost any respect I had for the Red Sox during the 2003 ALCS, when, after the "Sawx" won game six, the half-drunk Red Sox fans began pounding the bar and chanting "Yankees S**k!" over and over.

God knows Yankees fans have never, ever said a bad word about Boston.

Please. If one doesn't like a team because some of their fans get drunk and say asinine things, there'd be no reason to watch sports, period.

 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2007 - 11:46 PM   
 By:   Eric Paddon   (Member)

Except JS, so much of the complaining from the worst kind of Boston Red Sox fan, has usually been rooted in something that isn't true. For decades I had to put up with Red Sox fans acting as if the fact that they were "cursed" somehow made them a more special ballclub, and the embodiment of the common folk in baseball and only that evil greedy corporate capitalist mentality fo the Yankees buying championships ever since Babe Ruth victimized poor, pitiful Boston.

Except that so much of that is based on falsehoods of the first order. Ruth was sold to the Yankees because (1) he'd worn out his welcome in Boston by refusing to pitch any longer and (2) the Red Sox owner needed Yankee support in a war with the AL President, not because he wanted to finance a play. Second, much of the Red Sox failure to win a championship for seventy years after that, was due to the horrible legacy of their 1933-76 owner, Tom Yawkey, who despite his benighted status as a "gentleman" of the sport in contrast to the likes of evil George Steinbrenner, was a man who made Boston the last team in baseball to integrate, and who often coddled favorite ballplayers in a country club atmosphere, often undercutting the authority of his managers, and who was even prepared to move the team out of Boston but for the 1967 "Impossible Dream" pennant. Then after his death, Yawkey, determined to beat the adage that you can't take it with you, insisted the team stay in a family trust which led to nothing but ownership instability until the current owners who've won two championships in four years came aboard.

"Yankees s----!" is a chant that made me want to throw up, because if we "s---!" despite being the most successful franchise in the history of professional sports, what does that say about the people uttering the chant? Something that doesn't show much in the way of class if you ask me. Yeah, we used to chant "1918!" all those years, but when we did it, we at least were speaking to a fundamental truth that existed at the time.

I will not say "Red Sox s----!" even though I hate the team more than any other in professional sports, because they earned their championships and I would not think of ruining their moments of triumph. The pity is that we Yankee fans have seldom to never been given the same courtesy in return by Yankee-haters from all over the country. Because "Yankees s---!" is unfortunately a chant that isn't the exclusive domain of the drunks, it's also sadly the kind of pack mentality chant I see in too much "mainstream" fandom.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 2, 2007 - 1:11 AM   
 By:   JSWalsh   (Member)

Except JS, so much of the complaining from the worst kind of Boston Red Sox fan, has usually been rooted in something that isn't true. For decades I had to put up with Red Sox fans acting as if the fact that they were "cursed" somehow made them a more special ballclub, and the embodiment of the common folk in baseball and only that evil greedy corporate capitalist mentality fo the Yankees buying championships ever since Babe Ruth victimized poor, pitiful Boston.



As someone who's lived in Boston all my life I say with honesty I have never met that kind of fan, except those who joke about it.

I believe what you write, but by the same token I've never once encountered it here.

Considering the sheer numbers of fans of any ball team, I just find focusing on the biggest idiots self-defeating. I've met many, many a-hole Yankees fans, and no Red Sox fans of the type you have--I think that says something about both of out personal perspectives, personal biases, and what we're primed to respond to. Why would I not pay attention to a team because of what some fans have said or done? I mean, come on, are you really trying to argue that Yankees fans aren't among the loudest, most beliigerent and flat-out nastiest folks around? If I were to consider which teams and which teams fans have contributed to the fannish ugliness that is out there, the Yankees would be the first folks I thought of.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 2, 2007 - 1:17 AM   
 By:   JSWalsh   (Member)



"Yankees s----!" is a chant that made me want to throw up, because if we "s---!" despite being the most successful franchise in the history of professional sports, what does that say about the people uttering the chant? Something that doesn't show much in the way of class if you ask me. Yeah, we used to chant "1918!" all those years, but when we did it, we at least were speaking to a fundamental truth that existed at the time.



So it was okay for your side to be nasty and insulting because you came up with a catchier slogan?

Come on, man. I simply can't conceive of these gentle, sportmanslike Yankee fans you seem to know, who clap politely and cheer on both sides, or are just so darned civilized until these awful Red Sox fans started all the ugliness. Yankees fans are among the most obnoxious, 'we're great, you suck" types around--are you REALLY going to try to tell me that Yankees fans never shout "Red Sox suck!"?

Like New York, Boston has a number of colleges in the area, and a lot of drunken college idiots looking for release. The "badass" mentality that has turned me and many others off of sports certainly didn't catch New Yorkers unawares--"Oh, wow, why can't those other teams be NICE like us?"

New York has a lot of blowhard, loud, obnoxious fans--please don't pretend that they only do because some drunken Boston idiot shouted "Yankees suck!" once. The rest of the country sees how the fans of Boston, New York and L.A. behave, and they're not impressed. Why that should turn one off to a TEAM, I don't know.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 2, 2007 - 5:58 AM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

I lost any respect I had for the Red Sox during the 2003 ALCS, when, after the "Sawx" won game six, the half-drunk Red Sox fans began pounding the bar and chanting "Yankees S**k!" over and over.

God knows Yankees fans have never, ever said a bad word about Boston.


Perhaps, but this is an all-time low:


http://www.cfidsreport.com/Articles/PersonalStory/JimEisenriech.htm

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 2, 2007 - 7:56 AM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

Hey Eric, remember this "hot prospect"?



You gotta love how they have to say something nice about a player:

 
 Posted:   Nov 2, 2007 - 12:28 PM   
 By:   Eric Paddon   (Member)

JS, I'll be the first to admit that the "Bleacher Bum" types of NY fans are exactly as you describe them and just as prone to that kind of crudity and probably worse on a lot of occasions.

What I have more in mind though is what gets printed up in more mainstream outlets. The levels of Yankee hatred get accorded a respectability in media outlets among sportswriters and authors that has long been the source of my irritation, and not the fact that I think drunken Boston fans who are boorish are different from drunken boorish New York fans. I'm thinking of the massive levels of irritation I feel when I walk into a Borders and browse the shelves and see books entitled "The Devil Wears Pinstripes" which is a screed about how evil the Yankees are, and this is written by a regular ESPN columnist, who supposedly possesses a higher caliber of intellect and class than your average drunk in the bleachers. Or another book on the Yankees-Red Sox rivalry that pits it as a "Good vs. Evil" struggle, and then there are the motley collection of books written by the one ex-player I have the biggest dislike of, Bill Lee, who knows how to write his junk about the Red Sox and baseball that makes the "Spaceman" an icon, even though an objective observer would note that Lee deserved to wear the goathorns in Boston history a lot more than Mike Torrez and Bill Buckner were ever made to do (since it was Lee who flushed away a 3-0 Boston lead in Game 7 of the 75 World Series with his eephus pitch to Tony Perez). It's that proliferation of "Yankees s----!" sentiment in the *mainstream* of sports writing and literature that gets me annoyed so much and not that I think Boston fans are worse by nature. I apologize if I conveyed that impression.

Hey, shouldn't this prove to the doubters once and for all we're two different people? wink

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 2, 2007 - 12:30 PM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)


Hey, shouldn't this prove to the doubters once and for all we're two different people? wink


I'll bet you typed that wearing your 2004-2007 BoSox Dynasty T-Shirt...big grin

 
 Posted:   Nov 2, 2007 - 12:30 PM   
 By:   Eric Paddon   (Member)

Hey Eric, remember this "hot prospect"?

Yep. But he at least didn't come back to haunt the Yankees after he was traded to the White Sox for Rich Dotson, the way Jay Buhner did.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 2, 2007 - 12:33 PM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

While we're in the 1980s:



Here's one for Anzaldiman:



My team didn't exist then, so:



 
 Posted:   Nov 2, 2007 - 12:40 PM   
 By:   Eric Paddon   (Member)

I remember that SI cover. The All Star Break in 1987 when the Yankees had a five game lead in the AL East and the Mets were floundering in second. It's a snapshot of a moment most people have forgotten about the Yankee teams of 1983-88, in that they were competitive to a point, but always kept falling apart in August from lack of pitching AND were cursed by being in the most competitive division in baseball.

That year the Yankees finished in FOURTH place in the AL East with 89 wins. The Minnesota Twins, by virtue of their being placed in the weak AL West, became world champs despite only 85 regular season wins that year which wouldn't have been good enough for fourth place in the AL East.

That to me is the final word on whether the wildcard is "unfair" or not. The system that already existed had created far more "unfair" scenarios than the wildcard ever has.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 2, 2007 - 12:44 PM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

I know that Mattingly doesn't have a WS ring as a player, but not even as a coach? Shame. As for 1987, that was also the year that he hit all of those grand slams, IIRC.

'87 was also the year that a few of the Mets (Carter and Keith, maybe Ojeda, IIRC)were in the box at Busch stadium watching the Cards clinch the NL East vs. the Expos(?) Man, my memory isn't what it was...

EDIT: Here it is-

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DE0DA1E3CF931A35753C1A961948260

 
 Posted:   Nov 2, 2007 - 1:13 PM   
 By:   Eric Paddon   (Member)

Mattingly hit six grand slams in 1987. And never hit another grand slam before or after that.

Mattingly's career as a Yankee player and coach since 1982 (one year after their 1981 pennant) encompasses 18 of the last 20 seasons the Yankees failed to play in a World Series (exceptions being 1997 and 2002).

 
 Posted:   Nov 2, 2007 - 9:35 PM   
 By:   Eric Paddon   (Member)

Well, so far the Yankee off-season has seen three smart moves with (1) cutting A-Rod loose (2) hiring Girardi and now (3) word that Abreu's option has been picked up for another year.

Now on to 4 and 5 with getting Posada and Mo re-upped.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2010 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.