 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the film leaves a bad taste in your mouth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting development: THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE 2 has been rejected by the BBFC as potentially obscene....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder what "genuine risk" the film poses?
None. It's just insipid and offensive.
A waste of time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posted: |
Jun 9, 2011 - 6:38 AM
|
|
|
|
By: |
MikeP
(Member)
|
Interesting development: THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE 2 has been rejected by the BBFC as potentially obscene....
ah good ole censorship. While I have no interest in seeing the sequel, I am against the BBFC's decision and even more so, how they spoiled the film by saying why they rejected it. I wont type here what parts are of concern to them, but they are pretty graphic. You can find them on the net. The director is apparently angry as heck as well. As he should be.
No, he should not be angry. He is a clown, a sad and obviously sick person. And after watching the original movie, it is obvious he has no talent as a writer, director or actor. He knows fucking well the kind of attention and ire he would draw, and you can be sure as he shakes his fist and raises his voice in protest, in private he wrings his hands in glee.
Oh let us go ahead and spoil it. There is no reason in the world for anything like this to be on film. It is NOT the work of a filmmaker, it is the work of a souless hack with financing and a camera.
The principal focus of The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence) is the sexual arousal of the central character at both the idea and the spectacle of the total degradation, humiliation, mutilation, torture, and murder of his naked victims. Examples of this include a scene early in the film in which he masturbates whilst he watches a DVD of the original Human Centipede film, with sandpaper wrapped around his penis, and a sequence later in the film in which he becomes aroused at the sight of the members of the ‘centipede’ being forced to defecate into one another’s mouths, culminating in sight of the man wrapping barbed wire around his penis and raping the woman at the rear of the ‘centipede’
Now, who can go ahead and defend that? I am against censorship, but the idiot writer/director should never ever be allowed behind a camera. In front of a speeding semi truck, yes, but not behind a camera.
And who the hell finances something like this? It is stunt work, shock movie making and hell, I'd agree with the negative being burned 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
