 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think would be great to have Sam Mendes or Martin Campbell return and Roger Deakins because SKYFALL was simply STUNNING in terms of its look and CASINO ROYALE still holds its own as the best Bond film action wise. The only other directors that would excite me are:
David Fincher & Darius Khondji with a score by Ross/Fincher
Alfonso Cuarón & Emmanuel Lubezki with a score by Clint Mansell
Danny Boyle & Anthony Dod Mantle with a score by John Murphy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Go Sam, go Tom, go Daniel!
Well I certainly second the last one mate. I.ve been wanting Daniel to go since he was first cast!!!!!
 you little devil! Twist my words for your own purpose, would ya?
I was in your camp when the announcement was made - I couldn't imagine the hateful Rooney of Road to Perdition making a decent Bond. But then he did. I suppose that's called acting.
I wish he could look more like he did then - lean not bulked up
(so does Craig!)
brm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dont particularly care either way.
Skyfall is not just the worst Bond film i have ever seen, its probably one of the worst films i have ever seen.
Its hard to imagine Mendes making an even worse film and an even worse actor than Craig playing 007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dont particularly care either way.
Skyfall is not just the worst Bond film i have ever seen, its probably one of the worst films i have ever seen.
Its hard to imagine Mendes making an even worse film and an even worse actor than Craig playing 007.
only your cool avatar saves you from a severe thrashing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, i am man enuf to admit it - SKYFALL & Craig were both excellent
{i still dislike the first two entries and always will]
bruce
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posted: |
Jun 1, 2013 - 2:51 PM
|
|
|
|
By: |
BobJ
(Member)
|
Hey, i am man enuf to admit it - SKYFALL & Craig were both excellent
{i still dislike the first two entries and always will]
bruce
That's the interesting part... is there too much variety in this series now? Allow me to explain... unlike Bruce, I love Casino Royale. It's not necessarily the greatest, but it is an enjoyable "how did Bond begin" yarn. It's even better that it took this long to tell the tale as knowing what comes later enhances the experience. But has this series gone on so long, and offered so much variety (in story, storytelling, cinematic styles, lead actors, etc...) that it is now impossible for people to just enjoy these films as a collective whole?
In no other series do we have such diversity. I can rarely find two Bond fans (I'm talking die hard lovers of the series here) that agree on the series as a whole. Some prefer the comical edge brought in the Moore years (though truthfully started in "Diamonds Are Forever"), while others prefer the darker Connery years. Some will fight for Dalton to the death, and yet others still say there was no Bond until Brosnan played him. Now we have Craig, the "IT" of this generation who Roger Moore just recently (he used to say Connery) called the "greatest Bond" ever.
The films have been campy, dark, serious, exploitive, and now even somewhat art house-ish. No one can agree on any three points, yet we all love "Bond".
I cannot but help but wonder what opinions the next film will stir?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, i am man enuf to admit it - SKYFALL & Craig were both excellent
{i still dislike the first two entries and always will]
bruce
I cannot but help but wonder what opinions the next film will stir?
well, we already know that there is a contingent on this board that will hate it as long as Craig
is Bond.....
brm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'experts.....].
0 
appreciation of such matters is
