Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Dec 24, 2012 - 12:18 AM   
 By:   Sirusjr   (Member)

Jack Reacher (2012) - 5/10
Jack Reacher starts off with a bang. The opening sequence is shocking and powerful. Sadly it never regains the same level of tension as it displays in the opening sequence. While the idea of a character like Jack Reacher played by Tom Cruise is quite intriguing, it feels like the potential was wasted here. While Tom Cruz is satisfyingly bad-ass on the level of his character in "Collateral," the plot is not interesting enough to keep your interest, or to give him enough of a chance to show off his skills.

"Jack Reacher" starts off with the shooting of five people and most of the movie is spent trying to figure out who is behind it all. Sadly, most of the steps in the middle aren't particularly interesting. About half way through the film I felt myself wishing I hadn't come. There are a few solid fight sequences that work well, including a big chase scene and a shootout. Without an interesting main plot to drive everything home though, it seems fairly meaningless.

Though the plot failed to deliver, that isn't to say that it was completely worthless. There were a few times where the puzzle pieces fit together and I gave a little grin. Sadly, for each of these, there was a feeling of boredom or lack of purpose. Given what he had to work with, Joe Kraemer wrote a solid score for the film. The music is traditional orchestral tension driven by a few key motifs. Though Jack Reacher had the potential for something great, it never comes to the level of "Collateral" or "Mission Impossible 4." I can't recommend this film even for fans of Tom Cruz's action films. At best it is a decent rental but for most, you can safely give it a pass.

For more of my reviews, check out marvelmvs.wordpress.com

 
 Posted:   Dec 24, 2012 - 12:42 AM   
 By:   Josh   (Member)

Rise of the Guardians (2012)

4/5

Great story, animation, and score. The reliance on cheap nationalistic stereotypes to personify the main characters is a major detractor in an otherwise brilliant production.

 
 Posted:   Dec 26, 2012 - 1:41 PM   
 By:   mastadge   (Member)

Premium Rush (2012) dir. David Koepp -- Quite a disappointment. The premise of a NYC bike messenger's race against time (and bad guys) to deliver an important parcel, presented in (more or less) real time, seemed fairly interesting, but the movie plays out . . . poorly. The two leads are played by very competent actors who are given virtually nothing to work with, the chase is broken up by multiple overlong flashbacks and side quests, an implausible amount of stuff is packed into the movie's timeframe, and in the end the most relevant question is "why didn't they just take the subway?" Also, the protagonist is a giant jerk with an utter disregard not only for his own safety but for that of the traffic and pedestrians around him.

Resident Evil: Retribution (2012) dir. Paul W.S. Anderson -- I don't know why I keep watching these. The only one I've even come close to enjoying is the one directed by Russell Mulcahy, a b-movie director who's generally at least competent and occasionally pretty good. That said, this is very likely the worst of the bunch. It's as dull as any of them, with the added bonus of being pretty much completely irrelevant -- it plays out like one of those one-shot filler comic books where the hero has to survive in Arcade's Murderworld for an issue. One of the very worst movies of the year.

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012) dir. Peter Jackson -- A very frustrating movie; it gets so much right and so much wrong. The casting was overall excellent; Martin Freeman and James Nesbitt steal the show. Unfortunately, Jackson persists in being in love with his excesses, and the movie is full of scenes that go on a little too long (eagles picking up and dropping characters), scenes that go on more than a little too long (escape from the goblins), scenes that don't work (Radagast's chase is one of the most poorly blocked action scenes in recent memory, with no sense of location or scale whatsoever) and scenes that should have been cut (storm giants). Plus weird moments (when Balin tells Bilbo Thorin's story, and we cut to all the dwarves staring rapt at Thorin as if this was the first time they'd heard it. What?), weird omissions (we get to dwell on the eagles dropping things for 5 minutes but the movie can't spare 5 seconds for Gandalf to thank them?), and weird choices (Bilbo sparing Gollum's life should have been the climax of the film; instead, they choose to make the climax Bilbo stabbing some random orc. . .). Anyway, at this rate I can't help but feel this story would have been better suited to the originally planned duology rather than a trilogy, or perhaps even a single film. There was a lot to enjoy here but it frustrates that what could have been something special was instead merely a few excellent scenes padded with enough awkwardness to make the whole thing merely pretty good.

Beasts of the Southern Wild (2012) dir. Benh Zeitlin -- A wonderful bit of American magic realism, a joyful and unsettling little movie that, upon first reflection, deserves the acclaim it has received. Unfortunately I made the mistake of seeing it with someone whose taste runs more to literalism and got bombarded with a couple hours of I-don't-get-its and explain-it-to-mes right afterward. frown

 
 Posted:   Dec 26, 2012 - 8:51 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Cinderella (Disney Blu Ray) 9-10

Disney's remastered Blu Ray looks quite nice. Film grain, specs and other artifacts are absent, yet the backgrounds retain their details. In fact one can see the texture of the paper their painted on. If I had one faint critique it might be that they "posterized" the cel animation a bit to much. But it's nothing that really distracts my enjoyment of the end product.

This production shows some budget cutting in the art department. The little critters are stylized and less refined, there are far fewer effects shots. (Hardly any use of drop shadows for example) And the backgrounds are surprisingly simple (and sloppy) in their rendering. Though layout was top notch.

Regarding the story, it really struck me how much of this adaption plays out like an extended "Pluto" short. There are lengthy scenes of broad humor. Though it works. The humor and physical comedy are well planned out, and I found the critters antics quite enjoyable. The songs remain classic, tuneful and timeless.

Cinderella doesn't really do anything, but she shows such grace even under the worst of situations, its hard not to feel for her plight. Over all the characters are charming. (no pun intended)

What this film lacks in the art department it makes up for with its whimsical story and endearing characters.

 
 Posted:   Dec 27, 2012 - 1:57 AM   
 By:   BobJ   (Member)

Side-By-Side 5/5-Excellent documentary hosted by Keanu Reeves centering around the digital verses film debate. Directors like Nolan, Soderbergh, Lucas, and Scorsese are just a few that weigh in on the issue. I loved this film and will be watching it again later this week. Highly recommend.

Someone Is Watching Me 3/5-John Carpenter's third movie was this made for TV thriller released back in 1978. It stars Lauren Hutton as the new tenant of a computerized high rise (the films original title was High Rise) that is being terrorized by a man spying on her from across the street. As a student of film this was an interesting watch. As it was just after Assault On Precinct 13 and just before Halloween, you can see elements of both films in this. Also, for a made for TV film it is rather risque at times. I would recommend it for Carpenter fans interested in seeing his earlier writing and directing efforts. But there is a very low body count for those that care about that sort of thing as it is mainly a suspense thriller. I rather enjoyed it.

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 27, 2012 - 2:07 AM   
 By:   quiller007   (Member)

MAROONED (1969) 10/10 Den

Amazingly mature and serious Sci Fi for its time.



Yes, and quite believable as this incident almost actually happened
during one of the Apollo missions. MAROONED has taken a lot of unfair flack
over the decades for being "excruciatingly slow". Uh...that's the whole
point. It's three astronauts stranded in outer space in a tiny capsule,
and the excruciatingly slow process that it would take to bring them
safely home. Plus, they were running out of oxygen. What were they
supposed to do? Have a big party in space to help move the plot
along faster?

Den

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 27, 2012 - 2:17 AM   
 By:   Michael24   (Member)

Someone Is Watching Me 3/5-John Carpenter's third movie was this made for TV thriller released back in 1978. It stars Lauren Hutton as the new tenant of a computerized high rise (the films original title was High Rise) that is being terrorized by a man spying on her from across the street. As a student of film this was an interesting watch. As it was just after Assault On Precinct 13 and just before Halloween, you can see elements of both films in this. Also, for a made for TV film it is rather risque at times. I would recommend it for Carpenter fans interested in seeing his earlier writing and directing efforts. But there is a very low body count for those that care about that sort of thing as it is mainly a suspense thriller. I rather enjoyed it.

As a huge John Carpenter fan, this film eluded me for years until I finally got it on DVD back in January. I really enjoyed it. As you said, you can definitely see his style starting to grow with it. It's also a neat window of sorts at what was at the time high tech and sophisticated technology. It's very quaint nowadays, but that just adds to the charm. A very effective little suspenser. It saddens me that TV movies like this are no longer made. frown

 
 Posted:   Dec 28, 2012 - 3:05 PM   
 By:   Sirusjr   (Member)

Django Unchained (2012): 10/10
Quentin Tarantino has a reputation for having a bit of a penchant for an older style of film-making that seems to have gone out of style. It is for this reason that his films tend to be quite refreshing for a film buff tired of the Michael Bay style of action film-making. Tarantino showed his skill in his last film, "Inglorious Basterds" for bringing history to life in his own twisted way. Tarantino's films tend to delight in subjects that some might find distasteful. "Django Unchained" presents for your viewing pleasure the taboo subject of pre-Civil War slavery.

Django (Jamie Foxx) is a slave who is freed by a bounty hunter named Dr. Schultz (Christopher Waltz). Dr. Schultz seeks Django's help in locating and identifying certain fugitives. Once they finish that work, Dr. Schultz and Django set off to rescue Django's wife, a beautiful young slave girl who was taught German from her original mistress. Along the way, they take out a few more fugitives for good measure. The film builds nicely to a bloody, explosive climax that brings the film to a satisfying close.

Tarantino frequently fills his films with existing music rather than hiring a composer to write new material. For "Django Unchained," much of this music comes in the form of pieces from Italian westerns and other film scores by composers such as Luis Bacalov, Ennio Morricone, Jerry Goldsmith, and Riziero Ortolani. It also sports an original song written for the film by Ennio Morricone himself. The music compliments the film nicely, although a couple of the songs sound like they were remixed to add unnecessary bass. There is one rap track in the film that also shows up in the credits but thankfully it is tolerable.

"Django Unchained" is a lengthy movie at 2 hours and 45 minutes but it never overstays its welcome. This is largely because the script and music combine to create an intellectually stimulating film. The camera work is also superb, with some beautiful shots in styles rarely seen in modern films. While the film does have a few scenes of bloody violence, they are not the main focus of the film. Like "Inglorious Basterds", there is much more talking here than killing.

All the main actors in the film do a superb job. Christopher Waltz, Jamie Foxx, and Leonardo DiCaprio each take over the screen whenever they are on camera. Samuel L Jackson gives a great performance as well. If you are a fan of "Inglorious Basterds," "Django Unchained" is a must-see film that will not disappoint.

 
 Posted:   Dec 29, 2012 - 1:58 PM   
 By:   Sirusjr   (Member)

Les Miserables (2012) - 9/10
The story presented in "Les Miserables" is an old and familiar one; one of love, one of revolution, one of fighting for justice, and most of all, one of the human condition. The musical version of the story delivers beautiful melodies even when characters face deep despair. Though it would make for a better soundtrack album if the actors had decided to sing as beautifully as possible, they chose instead to deliver performances steeped in the despair of their characters. This gives us some performances that are closer to talking than singing but for a movie, it works much better.

Thankfully some actors deliver beautiful singing performances. What stood out to me were many of the young revolutionaries, including Eddie Redmayne who surprised me with his beautiful voice. Behind the singing is some impeccably orchestrated music that brings with it a depth of emotion even beyond the ability of the actors to convey. The story is also beautifully presented with elaborate set pieces and multitudes of color. The contrast between major scenes is stark, further driving home the contrast between life in the slums and the life enjoyed by the rich.

The acting by all involved is superb, even if Hugh Jackman and Russell Crowe falter at times in their singing. Young Samantha Barks makes a stunning film debut in her role as Eponine. Eddie Redmayne is delightful as Marius. Though her time on screen is relatively short, Anne Hathaway is stunning in her portrayal of Fantine. Whether you are deeply familiar with the story presented here or this movie is your first introduction to the story, the theatrical version of "Les Miserables" presented here is powerfully done and quite memorable.
For more of my reviews, check out marvelmvs.wordpress.com

 
 Posted:   Dec 30, 2012 - 2:19 PM   
 By:   mastadge   (Member)

Rare Exports (2010) dir. Jalmari Helander -- Cute but sleight Finnish Christmas horror. 6.5/10

ParaNorman (2012) dir. Chris Butler and Sam Fell -- A decent movie that could have been much better. Cute but only occasional glimpses of the sense of wonder that makes this kind of thing work, when it works. Also the takeaway message is possibly troubling. 6.5/10

Arbitrage (2012) dir. Nicholas Jarecki -- A superior thriller. Surprisingly, one of the year's better movies. Not sure it'd make the top 10, though. 7.5/10

Trouble With the Curve (2012) dir. Robert Lorenz -- Sort of a rebuttal to last year's Moneyball, a schmaltzy bit of sports melodrama. Not bad, not great. Eastwood plays a parody of himself, Adams is miscast as a ladder-climbing attorney. This movie, for better or worse, is at its best when Justin Timberlake is onscreen. 6/10

The Words (2012) dir. Brian Klugman and Lee Sternthal -- Almost. The movie fairly neatly handles its multiple nested stories, but its final twist is a bit on-the-nose and the whole thing feels a bit too tide; the writing bits especially don't quite ring true. Entertaining but definitely could have been better. 6/10.

 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2012 - 12:23 PM   
 By:   CindyLover   (Member)

Silver Linings Playbook. Not a work of genius, but any movie where the main character can't stand Stevie Wonder's "Ma Cherie Amour" is fine with me. Also, Jennifer Lawrence outacts Bradley Cooper handily. 8/10.

P.S. I shall buy a hat and eat it (or at least be very surprised) if this movie's DVD/Blu-ray release isn't swiftly followed by caps of Miss Lawrence in the dance scenes.

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2012 - 3:20 PM   
 By:   Michael24   (Member)

Parental Guidance (2012) - 4/5

In an age where crap like The Hangover, Bridesmaids and Hot Tub Time Machine pass for comedies, it's nice to see a comedy film that's actually funny for a change. Billy Crystal and Bette Midler are great together. I laughed throughout, and amidst all of the goofiness is a sweet story with a really good heart.

 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2012 - 4:06 PM   
 By:   Sirusjr   (Member)

Parental Guidance (2012) - 4/5

In an age where crap like The Hangover, Bridesmaids and Hot Tub Time Machine pass for comedies, it's nice to see a comedy film that's actually funny for a change. Billy Crystal and Bette Midler are great together. I laughed throughout, and amidst all of the goofiness is a sweet story with a really good heart.


Damn, you make me want to see it now. Anyone who considers those other movies worthless instantly has good taste in my book. I think I'll rent it though.

 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2012 - 7:11 PM   
 By:   Michaelware   (Member)

Les Miserables. 0
I laughed every time someone tried to 'sing.' This movie is taken seriously? WTF. Direction was just close ups and wide shots, repeated for 2 1/2 hrs. Hilarious.


Django Unchained 0

Look up minstrel show. That's what this is. In racial terms the european enables the black dude to murder ppl for commercial gain, but it's still the caucasian in power. Tarantino's snuff movies complement a culture obsessed with indulging hatred and misogyny. Critics are now completely unable or are just afraid to differentiate pointless fluff from artistry. I'm fully aware of how it's considered irreligious (and probably soon to be illegal) to criticise this director. Hasn't stopped me so far. Bloodlust porn.

 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2012 - 7:28 PM   
 By:   Michaelware   (Member)

Heaven's Gate 7/10 ***
Cimino's weird way with characterisation maybe gets in the way for me, but the movie has passion and artistic ambition of the sort only one person would bother to make. The story of elitists above the law seeking to profit by taking things via death squads is interesting, and the idea of wall st elitists or robber barons or whatever still resonates. The new blu ray release synchs up with current times so it at least has academic appeal. Because the image is finally cleaner you can absorb the performances and appreciate Kristofferson's pained nobility, and the conflicting motives in Walken and Hupert that are never far from total self-loathing. Wow big movie for such novelistic devices. I liked it. The image is cleaned up but the diffused goldeny tones that were discussed by Zsigmond in the Nov. 1980 issue of American Cinematography have been changed to a more conventional color grading, so it is altered from the intention it was shot with.

 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2012 - 8:33 PM   
 By:   Sirusjr   (Member)


Django Unchained 0

[SNIP] Bloodlust porn.


How the hell is this Bloodlust porn? There is hardly any blood in the movie except for a few short sequences. Sure there is a lot in some of the larger ending sequences but most of it is dialog. This is hardly a movie for gore hounds.

 
 Posted:   Jan 1, 2013 - 12:33 AM   
 By:   Warlok   (Member)

Rare Exports - I agree with Mastadge: a 6 out of ten. It starts as a very promising dark disturbing twisted horror tale, and then morphs (due to lack of funds?) into a slightly twisted comedy. Unfulfilled potential.

Chronicle - an easy 10 out of ten. Unexpectedly great. Care not for any mention of camera style... this is good drama. A modern sci-fi tale with realistic characters. Unreserved recommendation.

Casablanca - 9 out of ten. Deserves its accolades. Best film ever made? Maybe in its era, yes: one of the first films to get away from simplistic black hat vs. white hat setups, I think. And to do it well. Best line (pardon my memory if I am only close...): [SPOILER]

Makes sure the Germans get the best seats by the girls.

Of course - and if I did not do so, the Germans would just take them anyway...

[ENDSPOILER]

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 1, 2013 - 12:51 AM   
 By:   Michael24   (Member)

Rare Exports - I agree with Mastadge: a 6 out of ten. It starts as a very promising dark disturbing twisted horror tale, and then morphs (due to lack of funds?) into a slightly twisted comedy. Unfulfilled potential.

Although I enjoyed the film immensely, I'm not sure I understand why so many people seem to think it's a comedy. Yes, it has some moments of humor, but I don't see how it can be classified as a "comedy." It's more of a dark fantasy/adventure.

 
 Posted:   Jan 1, 2013 - 4:42 AM   
 By:   Warlok   (Member)

Rare Exports - I agree with Mastadge: a 6 out of ten. It starts as a very promising dark disturbing twisted horror tale, and then morphs (due to lack of funds?) into a slightly twisted comedy. Unfulfilled potential.

Although I enjoyed the film immensely, I'm not sure I understand why so many people seem to think it's a comedy. Yes, it has some moments of humor, but I don't see how it can be classified as a "comedy." It's more of a dark fantasy/adventure.


Easy: the last quarter of the movie is unmistakeably comedic. This is in stark contrast to the much more threatening ambiance of the first 3/4.

It changed...

 
 Posted:   Jan 1, 2013 - 10:24 AM   
 By:   CH-CD   (Member)


How many times have you switched on the TV on a Holiday afternoon and said...

"NOT "Mary Poppins" - AGAIN !" ?

Well, I just did.....and two and a quarter hours later left the room smiling ! big grin

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.