Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Mar 31, 2016 - 9:37 PM   
 By:   Jim Doherty   (Member)

I have more notes about this score, and the Blu-ray presentation. I will post them tomorrow.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 1, 2016 - 12:49 AM   
 By:   Stephen Pickard   (Member)

Apart from some audible deterioration, the 3-track isolated score in DTS-MA on the blu-ray sounds fantastic.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 1, 2016 - 9:15 AM   
 By:   Jim Doherty   (Member)

Wow, CH-CD, thanks for that info. I have the UK Brunswick edition and never noticed those differences!

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 1, 2016 - 9:18 AM   
 By:   Jim Doherty   (Member)

To Stephen Pickard:

I have to disagree. The music in the actual film sounds much brighter. The isolated track chops off much of the high end and emphasizes the mid-range frequencies too much.

 
 Posted:   Apr 1, 2016 - 9:27 AM   
 By:   Lokutus   (Member)

Well... doesn't seem very likely... as there is still no decent release of NICHOLAS AND ALEXANDRA, THE BLUE LAGOON or THE WAY WE WERE although all of them had isolated scores included on recent BDs....

I'm still waiting for a C.D. release of "Nicholas And Alexandra", which should've gotten one because of the Twilight Time Blu ray release (the same applies to "The Blue Lagoon" and "The Way Were" or the other Twilight Time Blu ray releases with isolated scores).



Perhaps the reason is lack of better elements... since the sound quality on N+A is far from perfect... but even the reissue of the original LP from the actual LP master (or even LP if there is no other way) would be good enough! Seriously this one is a neglected masterpiece.

 
 Posted:   Apr 1, 2016 - 9:28 AM   
 By:   Lokutus   (Member)

Apart from some audible deterioration, the 3-track isolated score in DTS-MA on the blu-ray sounds fantastic.



How much unreleased score is actually in the film?

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 1, 2016 - 9:29 AM   
 By:   Jim Doherty   (Member)

TO CH-CD

Do you have the original Decca LP? Do those differences you mentioned also appear between the 1956 Decca and Brunswick pressings, or only between the 1956 Brunswick pressings and the later Varese LP/CD pressings?

I ask because I never had the original Decca LP (I only had the UK Brunswick LP), and would like to know how much the Decca LP and the Varese re-issues differ.

 
 Posted:   Apr 1, 2016 - 9:58 AM   
 By:   Ron Pulliam   (Member)

In case no one knows, the FOX records -- mono and stereo -- have, I believe 3 or 4 bands which are different from each other...some longer on one and shorter on the other...and vice versa...I canna remember exactly, so check it for yourself...

There is more music on the stereo LP. I don't know why.

FWIW: There is more music on the Capitol Records stereo issues of "The King and I" and "Carousel" than on the mono issues.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 1, 2016 - 10:13 AM   
 By:   cinemel1   (Member)

As to the Carousel & King & I LPs: it's the stereo vinyl that is abbreviated on both. The Carousel Waltz runs only 3+ minutes on the stereo LP; the mono is about 7 minutes. On the King & I stereo LP Getting to Know You excludes the dance music in the middle of the cue. The mono contains the song complete. The full songs are included on the initial CD releases. Later CDs added more music for many cues on both, but these seemed to be from the actual film tracks and dance music includes sound effects like shuffling feet. BTW, both scores have Alfred Newman conducting at his best. Sublime!

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 1, 2016 - 10:18 AM   
 By:   Jim Doherty   (Member)

To Ron Pullman:

I believe you are wrong about THE KING AND I and CAROUSEL, as far as the LP issues go.

The MONO issues of those LPs have more music, such as in the GETTING TO KNOW YOU number in THE KING AND I, and the CAROUSEL WALTZ in CAROUSEL.

THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK, mentioned earlier, was an odd exception to the rule, in which the STEREO version actually had more music than the mono version.

 
 Posted:   Apr 1, 2016 - 10:53 AM   
 By:   Ron Pulliam   (Member)

I knew it was one way or other. Mistakenly assigned the stereo LPs as the ones having more music.

In "The King I", there is a missing musical bridge on the stereo version of "Getting to Know You" that exists on the mono LP (and in the film, naturally).

In "Carousel", the mono has a complete waltz whereas the stereo has the first part of the walts missing.

Sigh.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 1, 2016 - 5:18 PM   
 By:   Jim Doherty   (Member)

To Joe Caps:

I can't find anything (as far as Newman cues), that are on the isolated track of the Blu-ray that are not in the actual film. Yes, there are are few moments where cues are faded in or out earlier, but there are no cues that appear on the isolated track that are TOTALLY missing in the actual film. The most truncated cue in the movie itself is when Bergman recognizes "Nini," her mother's lady-in-waiting (about 30:00 into into the film). In the film, the beginning of the cue is left out then then dialed up after about 15 seconds. On the ISO track, you get it in full.

There are a few other moments where the ISO track goes on a tiny bit longer than in the film itself, but these are not Newman compositistions.

 
 Posted:   Apr 1, 2016 - 5:53 PM   
 By:   CH-CD   (Member)

TO CH-CD

Do you have the original Decca LP? Do those differences you mentioned also appear between the 1956 Decca and Brunswick pressings, or only between the 1956 Brunswick pressings and the later Varese LP/CD pressings?

I ask because I never had the original Decca LP (I only had the UK Brunswick LP), and would like to know how much the Decca LP and the Varese re-issues differ.



Sorry, Jim!

I’m afraid I don’t have the original Decca album, only the UK original Brunswick LP.

I bought the Varese Stereo much later on.

 
 Posted:   Apr 1, 2016 - 6:08 PM   
 By:   CH-CD   (Member)

I knew it was one way or other. Mistakenly assigned the stereo LPs as the ones having more music.

In "The King I", there is a missing musical bridge on the stereo version of "Getting to Know You" that exists on the mono LP (and in the film, naturally).

In "Carousel", the mono has a complete waltz whereas the stereo has the first part of the walts missing.

Sigh.


There is another famous Mono/Stereo omission, Ron.

On the Capitol STEREO LP of “High Society”, in the “Well, Did You Evah?” number, after Frank’s retort... “Don’t Dig That Kind of Crooning,Chum”, Bing’s spoken reply “You Must be One of the Newer Fellas?” is missing. It was on the original MONO pressing.

Likewise, in the original MONO pressing of “GIGI”, the title song has a different recording to the later, STEREO LP.
On the Mono, Louis Jourdan sings the first few bars. On the STEREO, his delivery is more spoken.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 2, 2016 - 12:29 AM   
 By:   Stephen Pickard   (Member)

To Stephen Pickard:

I have to disagree. The music in the actual film sounds much brighter. The isolated track chops off much of the high end and emphasizes the mid-range frequencies too much.


Thanks Jim, I'll have another listen.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 2, 2016 - 7:21 AM   
 By:   Joe Caps   (Member)

Ouis Jordan was constantly going back and overdubbing new intrepretations of the song Gigi.
On the mono the parts he sings are talkied in the final version and the parts he talks in the mono are song in the later version.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 2, 2016 - 2:19 PM   
 By:   Stephen Pickard   (Member)

To Stephen Pickard:

I have to disagree. The music in the actual film sounds much brighter. The isolated track chops off much of the high end and emphasizes the mid-range frequencies too much.


Thanks Jim, I'll have another listen.


Hi Jim. I watched the film again this morning, switching from the 5.1 to the isolated score, and apart from a piece of classical music - when they attend a concert - that does sound rolled off, my opinion doesn't change much.
While I appreciate, and you have a right, to your opinion, I feel there are a few variables that may affect our judgement. Firstly, from what I've experienced with '50's Fox films the raw music track does seem to go through quite a change in character when it goes to the final mixing stage, whether it be eq. etc., I don't know. Also the US music tracks were played back on UK reproducers (which shouldn't bear any change as UK audio engineers would have knowledge on how to reproduce foreign recordings, quite common).
The score was recorded in LCR long shot and close shot and levels against one another may vary in final mixing depending upon the dramatic demands of the film. Presumably when the music tracks were transferred in recent years for archiving purposes they were combined presumably at a fixed equal level.
Putting all this information aside, I am not saying this has any bearing on your opinion, I would find it difficult to come up with a fixed general opinion as you have. Seeing that you are an audio engineer you have obviously more sensitive ears.
I do have audio experience, but only in the audio transfer area. But I do credit myself with a little knowledge of how good or bad audio sounds but obviously nowhere near your level.

 
 Posted:   Nov 29, 2016 - 12:01 PM   
 By:   CH-CD   (Member)

In case no one knows, the FOX records -- mono and stereo -- have, I believe 3 or 4 bands which are different from each other...some longer on one and shorter on the other...and vice versa...I canna remember exactly, so check it for yourself...


There are indeed some differences between the two LP’s.

The original UK Mono LP has a longer “Russian Easter” track, with chants.

The “Marche de Bataillie” track has the Calliope overlay mentioned elsewhere on this thread.

The Wildfire Polka” is taken at a much faster tempo.

There is also a “Chimes” segue between two of the tracks. I can’t remember which as it’s years since I played the Mono.




Just been browsing on Spotify and realised that the album they have on there entitled “Alfred Newman Film Music” ( Image is a clapperboard and film reel on a grey background), is in fact the original MONO LP release of “Anastasia”.
It is obviously copied from an LP because it has surface noise and a few clicks but, it does have all the extra bits on that the later Stereo release does not. Have a listen.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 29, 2016 - 12:50 PM   
 By:   Rozsaphile   (Member)

I just happened to catch up with this film last week, having seen only portions in the past. Yul Brynner was certainly on a roll in the mid-1950s! Ingrid Bergman "acts up a storm" in a way that seems dated now. All those emphatic coughs haven't aged well. Her Oscar surely had more to do with sentiment than anything else. Newman's main theme is memorable indeed, but it's overused. There's a potentially wonderful scene where Anastasia contemplates suicide and Newman's tortured music gets to the core of the character. But a couple of Hollywood "drunk" extras and a return to the main theme undercut the final effect. It's a pity that Newman was not encouraged or allowed to compose original material where diegetic scoring was called for.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 29, 2016 - 12:57 PM   
 By:   James MacMillan   (Member)

Diegetic? Oh, not again. Surprised at you, John.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.