Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Jan 20, 2015 - 5:56 AM   
 By:   paulhickling   (Member)

And we still wait for a Victorian England set one.

There's already been one. By all accounts, however, it sucks.


Yeah, I have it somewhere. From what I could tell it was a semi-professional affair at best. Not a genuine studio release. I've never had the patience to sit through it.

I wouldn't mind a movie of Jeff Wayne's rock album, though I want a 'straight' version too. Obviously not something that could happen within the same five years or so, although with the amount of rebooting the super hero flicks get, I'd be happy.

Now if someone like Peter Jackson was to have a crack at it...

 
 Posted:   Jan 25, 2015 - 3:00 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Copenhagen (2014) 5-5

I can't recommend this film enough for open-minded people. The subject matter may scare some people off but this is no Lolita or The Lover. It's not a sensational movie nor is sex the primary focus. It is a lovely story about two people who befriend one another, very well told and acted. Physical desires do arise but it is kept in check.

At first I thought I was going to hate this film. The main male lead is a class A-grade Ahole in the beginning. Here I was thinking, another independent film about despicable unlikeable characters. I wouldn't say he totally redeems himself, but he softens up as the film progresses and matures.

The writing is quite witty and funny. The acting was wonderfully fresh and felt naturalistic as was the progression of the relationship. There are leisure bicycle rides here not supt up car chases.

The film hit the sweet spot for me. It didn't feel like a cliched Hollywood film, or was it too artsy to be alienating. It's a film you have to listen to carefully. I honestly missed the significance of the last scene until I viewed the film a second time. It made it all the more special.

 
 Posted:   Jan 30, 2015 - 2:20 PM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (1998) 8/10

The film itself aside...I don't know. Johnny Depp--who was wonderfully idiosyncratic before getting bogged down by the big money of those pirate films--and his star power excluded, makes me wonder how this film ever got made, especially when one considers the time period in which it was made. I mean, 1998?!? There wasn't shit shakin' then. I realize there was a previous attempt at a Hunter S. Thompson road movie, but even that came just after the time in which it was supposed to be set. Because F&L was made in 1998 it isn't really a part of its time so it will never be a relic. The film just seems to come from nowhere despite being written and set in a set time and place. It's amusing to see the desperate attempts by the corporate goons to market this thing, all of which fail in their awkwardness. F&L is just its own world and in that regard, is unlike any movie I've ever seen.

 
 Posted:   Feb 7, 2015 - 10:38 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Silver Linings Playbook- 3-5

The first half was somewhat interesting and entertaining. However the second half abruptly turns into a stereotypical Hollywood romantic dramedy. The script was atrocious and at times laughably bad. (Apparently there's only one cop in town and he always shows up when you need him.) Without giving away spoilers the sudden 360 of one character, and selfish underhanded manipulation of another character really leaves me cold. These characters are not likeable or true to themselves. I didn't feel like I could latch onto anyone's plight.

Jennifer Lawrence was okay. I really liked her scenes where she showed some emotion, especially during some dramatic outbursts. But personally think Jennifer Lawrence lacks charisma as an actor. Other than a few shinning moments her character wasn't at all interesting. Bradley Cooper puts in a decent performance but I never once forgot he was acting. Robert De Niro does his thing. It was a serviceable performance.

With a better script this could have been something really special.

 
 Posted:   Feb 15, 2015 - 9:34 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Not Another Happy Ending: 3-5

While I gave this the same rating as Silver Linings I enjoyed this film a bit more. It's a romantic comedy that's not very romantic or very funny to be honest.

Basic plot: After countless rejections a young writer has her manuscript picked up by a small publishing company. The writer and publisher fall in love in a breezy montage sequence. Soon after she breaks up with the creep for making changes to her book without her permission. There's a problem however. She signed onto a two book deal and must write a second book for him. She gets stuck on the last chapter and the publisher believes she can't finish the book because she's happy. You know how artists pull their best work out of them when they are depressed and tormented? Or so he thinks. So he devises a plan to make her sad and miserable so she can finish the second book.

Her old flame/publisher is one huge jerk. He actually entertains the idea of giving her a dog then killing it. Romantic guy huh? What he does instead while not as bad, is just as cruel.

The films plot moves too swiftly, and it felt more like a paint by numbers approach to story telling. Her relationship with her publisher, new found love, and father all felt contrived because they were so rushed.

Karen Gillan puts in a serviceable performance but there's nothing particularly great about it. To date Doctor Who and Selfie remains her best work. Before I forget, Karen was obviously shaved bald for her role in Guardians when this film was made and she wears these absolutely fake looking wigs imaginable. It was very distracting. (I know she had a wig made of her real hair, but this didn't appear to be her hair)

One last thing, this film was tracked with countless pop songs which brought nothing to the experience. Every time I heard another song I just roll my eyes. It's a lazy gimmick used to telegraph characters feelings so the actors don't have too themselves. At times I thought I was watching a music video instead of viewing a theatrical film.

This is an average film at best.

 
 Posted:   Feb 16, 2015 - 9:32 AM   
 By:   Sirusjr   (Member)

Copenhagen (2014) 5-5

I can't recommend this film enough for open-minded people. The subject matter may scare some people off but this is no Lolita or The Lover. It's not a sensational movie nor is sex the primary focus. It is a lovely story about two people who befriend one another, very well told and acted. Physical desires do arise but it is kept in check.

At first I thought I was going to hate this film. The main male lead is a class A-grade Ahole in the beginning. Here I was thinking, another independent film about despicable unlikeable characters. I wouldn't say he totally redeems himself, but he softens up as the film progresses and matures.

The writing is quite witty and funny. The acting was wonderfully fresh and felt naturalistic as was the progression of the relationship. There are leisure bicycle rides here not supt up car chases.

The film hit the sweet spot for me. It didn't feel like a cliched Hollywood film, or was it too artsy to be alienating. It's a film you have to listen to carefully. I honestly missed the significance of the last scene until I viewed the film a second time. It made it all the more special.


I watched it on streaming recently and it was solid. I would maybe give it a 3.5 or 4 out of 5. While the interactions between the main characters was well done I wasn't that impressed by the overall end goal of the movie. It didn't feel authentic enough for me.

 
 Posted:   Feb 16, 2015 - 9:45 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Copenhagen (2014) 5-5

I can't recommend this film enough for open-minded people. The subject matter may scare some people off but this is no Lolita or The Lover. It's not a sensational movie nor is sex the primary focus. It is a lovely story about two people who befriend one another, very well told and acted. Physical desires do arise but it is kept in check.

At first I thought I was going to hate this film. The main male lead is a class A-grade Ahole in the beginning. Here I was thinking, another independent film about despicable unlikeable characters. I wouldn't say he totally redeems himself, but he softens up as the film progresses and matures.

The writing is quite witty and funny. The acting was wonderfully fresh and felt naturalistic as was the progression of the relationship. There are leisure bicycle rides here not supt up car chases.

The film hit the sweet spot for me. It didn't feel like a cliched Hollywood film, or was it too artsy to be alienating. It's a film you have to listen to carefully. I honestly missed the significance of the last scene until I viewed the film a second time. It made it all the more special.


I watched it on streaming recently and it was solid. I would maybe give it a 3.5 or 4 out of 5. While the interactions between the main characters was well done I wasn't that impressed by the overall end goal of the movie. It didn't feel authentic enough for me.


I agree the ending was rather ambiguous and I really didn't get significance of returning the hateful letter to his grandfather other than to be a jerk. How was that maturing? Still love the film. What I didn't get the first time was the last scene in the film where he stood at the center where two rivers meet. That is significant because of an earlier scene in the film.

 
 Posted:   Feb 16, 2015 - 12:45 PM   
 By:   Sirusjr   (Member)

You must not have been paying attention. I totally caught that the first time around. But yeah the way it ended just underscored the lack of direction I felt overall.

 
 Posted:   Feb 17, 2015 - 10:01 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Thanks to Netflix I can relive my childhood. Two films I haven't seen since the early 70's.

Escape To Witch Mountain (1975) 1-5

Disney didn't have that many great live action films and this certainly wasn't one of them. This really is a terrible film. Early on when Disney studios were creating animated classics they didn't talk down to the audience or makes movies just for kids. This is an example of taking a childish approach at almost every turn.

The film starts off on a very promising yet deceptive opening. During the credits we hear and see dramatic visuals and music. Rather awkwardly, (if you know your animation) they superimposed pencil animation of the hunting dogs from Bambi over the credits. It promised an intense film, but everything that followed was a dreary paced bore.

The optical effects were atrocious, though some of the wire rigging levitation scenes remain remarkably effective. While the main title theme is exciting, the over all score is minimalist and very sparse. The ending was rather interesting because in retrospect you can see Spielberg was greatly influence by this film as E.T. climax is almost identical to this film.

Swiss Family Robinson (1960) 3-5

Not a bad film for it's time and it certainly has a lot of elements that kids and adults alike could fantasize about. Ship wrecks, stranded on an island, a magnificent tree house, an ecology full of exotic animals, and meandering pirates. For the time of production and length its quickly paced and never slogs down or feels boring.

The film is scored almost from beginning to end with music. Music always played an important part in Disney's animated films, and here it carried over into his live action efforts.

My main gripe with the production was the handling of animals in this film, which there are many. I realize it was 1960, but there really isn't one scene where animals are not roughly handled, put in great distress, if not outright abused. Because of this it was hard to enjoy this film as an adult, and I doubt I'll ever watch this film again.

 
 Posted:   Feb 19, 2015 - 10:02 AM   
 By:   mastadge   (Member)

Watched The Maze Runner and The Giver yesterday. I know people like to rag on superhero flicks but Marvel products seems like masterpieces of imagination next to the YA adaptation extrusion flooding the market. The Giver was unforgivably (and, sadly, unironically) bland and familiar, despite its central theme of rebelling against sameness, while The Maze Runner was a dull, idiotic, morally loathsome disaster.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 19, 2015 - 10:36 AM   
 By:   Francis   (Member)

I didn't think much of Maze Runner, very by the book and predictable. I like the Greek mythology with the minotaur and was hoping that would factor in, but it was just another Lost/Hunger Games remix.

U Turn (1997) 6/10

While at times it felt like Stone doing Tarantino and the story for me a little too close to Red Rock West for comfort, I still enjoyed its cinematography and editing. Morricone's score not so much, but perhaps like the irritating characters, it was also meant to do just that. Great performance by Billy Bob. And Jennifer Lopez should be forbidden to act.

Jack Reacher (2012) 8/10

Another ego-trip character for Cruise and there are parts in the story where that goes overboard for me, but overall the thriller and investigation aspects of the movie were done ok and the score is excellent.

Magic Mike (2012) 8/10

The problem with doing a movie about strippers is that is what you get, a movie about strippers directed by Sodenbergh. Typical rise and fall plot but still an entertaining look behind the beef curtains.

Solomon Kane (2009) 5/10

Just like Season of the Witch a sorcery/medieval fantasy shot on the cheap in some east block country with a big special effects opening and ending and everything in between basically rethreads of better movies in the genre. I liked Season better than this, eventhough Kane features Max Von Sydow, Alice Krige and Hugh Jackman's clone, it didn't impress much.

Don't Be Afraid of the Dark (2010) 4/10

Horror movies with A-list actors rarely work for me and this one is no different, the story is hardly inventive and as it's written by Del Toro I wonder why he can't get the story to be as good as his monster and set designs? Just like the remake of The Haunting, this one looked good, but too many standard horror kills and predictable plot twists made me yawn plenty throughout.

 
 Posted:   Feb 21, 2015 - 12:35 PM   
 By:   CindyLover   (Member)

Jupiter Ascending. A great-looking but empty mess of a movie, which is a shame - eight or nine more rewrites, a more assertive heroine and some casting changes (Eddie Redmayne, I'm looking at you) would have helped. But at least I didn't want to shake the Wachowskis hard afterwards, which is more than I can say about The Matrix and its first sequel (I refuse to watch the second). 3/10.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 26, 2015 - 1:50 PM   
 By:   Francis   (Member)

The Signal (2014) 5/10

Ambitious little sci-fi movie that sadly can't deliver a decent payoff, still entertaining though.

The Loft (2014) 6/10

With an original Belgian movie and a Dutch remake preceding it, I was surprised to see the weaker elements of the second act of the original not resolved for this US remake by the same director. The moment where it jumps the shark for me is right about before the casino sequence, which is terribly over scored as well. There is still half a good movie in there and the performances aren't as bad as I read about in reviews, but seeing as how this remake doesn't improve upon the original, it felt like a wasted opportunity.

I've started watching the Universal monster collection, so far seen

The Mummy (1932) 3/10

Great opening sequence where a curse brings back the mummy but after that you basically get a rethread of Dracula's Carfax Abbey escapades, complete with past lover from a different time. Forgettable.

The Wolfman (1941) 7/10

Though still exposition heavy, the jekyl/Hyde theme of the lead character as the werewolf as well as the community's reaction is written well and the mythology and atmosphere works great. Good score as well. Enjoyed this one.

 
 Posted:   Feb 27, 2015 - 4:54 AM   
 By:   Grecchus   (Member)

Incendies

Came upon this by a chance event and thought it was a very competent portrayal of innocents caught up in middle eastern hell, wrought by war and multi-competing factions who alternate between being neighbors one moment, then deadly enemies the next with nothing but consequences thereafter.

The story starts in the outermost onion ring, then draws inwards until at the very end, you find yourself right in the very centre of things. There are carefully woven moments of flashback which seem to add weight to the narrative in non-linear form, however, they do converge at the centre of that onion in a moment of crystal clarity.

I then watched the additional features in which french-canadian director, Denis Villeneuve, outlines how, on first seeing the theatrically staged version, the story etched itself so deeply into his mind he decided he was going to bring it to the screen in as faithful an adaptation as was possible.

So it's no surprise Villeneuve has been chosen to direct the sequel to Blade Runner.

 
 Posted:   Mar 7, 2015 - 1:16 PM   
 By:   CindyLover   (Member)

Fifty Shades Of Grey. Dakota Johnson's performance is a lot better than the passionless and seemingly endless movie deserves, whereas Jamie Dornan's performance is exactly what the movie deserves. 2/10 (one for the Danny Elfman score, and one for Johnson's acting/fanservice).

 
 Posted:   Mar 14, 2015 - 12:37 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

RoboCop (2014) 2.5-5

This movie is the poster child of modern day film making. Truly generic, pointless, soulless, vanilla remake in all areas of production. It's watchable, but that's about it.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 14, 2015 - 4:52 AM   
 By:   Francis   (Member)

RoboCop (2014) 2.5-5

It's watchable, but that's about it.


I couldn't even finish watching it.

 
 Posted:   Mar 14, 2015 - 9:28 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

RoboCop (2014) 2.5-5

It's watchable, but that's about it.


I couldn't even finish watching it.


Well I can understand one being bored with the film. But I've seen much worse. It was just pointless. Mediocrity at it's best.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 15, 2015 - 2:20 PM   
 By:   Francis   (Member)


Well I can understand one being bored with the film. But I've seen much worse. It was just pointless. Mediocrity at it's best.


I had the same reaction as I did with the Total Recall remake (which I wanted to like); they changed around too much for no reason whatsoever and the new mix of ingredients never got going. Maybe part of me is just too used to the originals, but I do want to think I gave the remakes a chance. They just didn't do anything for me and felt redundant in every department. There is not one element in both movies that felt like an improvement.

Guardians of the galaxy (2014) 7/10

As with most Marvel properties, another comic book I'm unfamiliar with. I did take a liking to this uncanny troop and their often silly/goofy antics, the whole thing had an 80s vibe going for it and Chris Pratt makes a decent Indiana Jo… euhm lead for this movie. The score by Tyler Bates had some nice standout moments and though the theme is not my thing, I still enjoyed it. Was fun.

Dark Floors (2008) 3/10

I had this sitting on the hard drive for ages, I like horror movies taking place in a hospital ward. The premise (or lack thereof) feels reminiscent of Kingdom Hospital and the characters were hard to care for. The monsters are played by a finnish metal group Lordi (the guys who won eurovision?) and they appear in the movie at random, without any explanation. Apparently you need to delve into the bands' "mythos" to understand what is taking place, as if lol.

Black Sea (2014) 8/10

A team consisting of disgruntled laid off Brittish and Russian guns for hire head out in a submarine to retrieve lost gold in a nazi submarine at the bottom of the black sea; Jude Law plays the captain and his performance in this is outstanding. There's tension amongst the crew regarding the gold as well as danger of stranding there themselves and I found the whole thing very reminiscent of 'wages of fear' (and Sorcerer) as they battle the odds of making it out alive. I so wished this had a proper score as I found the existing one trite and too reminiscent an approach like Gravity; mostly sound design and the one big cue when something major takes place. Also some of the submarine shots looked like Thunderbirds, but everything interior of the sub was top notch film making. Highly recommended this one.

 
 Posted:   Mar 15, 2015 - 5:45 PM   
 By:   DeputyRiley   (Member)

There is not one element in both movies that felt like an improvement.

re: Total Recall remake:

Jessica Biel > Rachel Ticotin
Kate Beckinsale > Sharon Stone

smile

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.