Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Aug 16, 2016 - 3:16 PM   
 By:   First Breath   (Member)

I do not think I can bring myself to read this new Hooky book, I do not want to read it and feel like he trashed my whole idea of the band.

Yes, I wonder how that book is. I'm tempted to read it but I don't have very high thoughts of his behaviour towards Sumner and the band. He comes across as an incredibly difficult person in Sumner's book.

What do you mean with "trashed"?

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 17, 2016 - 5:09 AM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

I do not think I can bring myself to read this new Hooky book, I do not want to read it and feel like he trashed my whole idea of the band.

Yes, I wonder how that book is. I'm tempted to read it but I don't have very high thoughts of his behaviour towards Sumner and the band. He comes across as an incredibly difficult person in Sumner's book.

What do you mean with "trashed"?


Oh sorry FB I just mean that I know that all bands have disagreements, but it had seemed to me that Joy Division and New Order had done things pretty well, had stuck together, even after they lost Ian and they could have come apart at the seams. They mostly got along and figured out the roles, even as Sumner never really thought of himself as a vocalist at all. So for someone to leave the band and write a massive book in a jealous tone, I think it is destructive and not a good thing. So I would rather think of Joy Division and New Order more the way that Sumner tells the story.

 
 Posted:   Aug 17, 2016 - 1:29 PM   
 By:   First Breath   (Member)

I do not think I can bring myself to read this new Hooky book, I do not want to read it and feel like he trashed my whole idea of the band.

Yes, I wonder how that book is. I'm tempted to read it but I don't have very high thoughts of his behaviour towards Sumner and the band. He comes across as an incredibly difficult person in Sumner's book.

What do you mean with "trashed"?


Oh sorry FB I just mean that I know that all bands have disagreements, but it had seemed to me that Joy Division and New Order had done things pretty well, had stuck together, even after they lost Ian and they could have come apart at the seams. They mostly got along and figured out the roles, even as Sumner never really thought of himself as a vocalist at all. So for someone to leave the band and write a massive book in a jealous tone, I think it is destructive and not a good thing. So I would rather think of Joy Division and New Order more the way that Sumner tells the story.


Do you mean this book?
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Substance-Inside-Order-Peter-Hook/dp/1471132404/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1471461992&sr=1-1&keywords=peter+hook

According to Amazon it's not out yet?

Or did you mean this?
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Hacienda-How-Not-Run-Club/dp/184739177X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1471462140&sr=1-1&keywords=peter+hook+how

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 17, 2016 - 1:47 PM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

I do not think I can bring myself to read this new Hooky book, I do not want to read it and feel like he trashed my whole idea of the band.

Yes, I wonder how that book is. I'm tempted to read it but I don't have very high thoughts of his behaviour towards Sumner and the band. He comes across as an incredibly difficult person in Sumner's book.

What do you mean with "trashed"?


Oh sorry FB I just mean that I know that all bands have disagreements, but it had seemed to me that Joy Division and New Order had done things pretty well, had stuck together, even after they lost Ian and they could have come apart at the seams. They mostly got along and figured out the roles, even as Sumner never really thought of himself as a vocalist at all. So for someone to leave the band and write a massive book in a jealous tone, I think it is destructive and not a good thing. So I would rather think of Joy Division and New Order more the way that Sumner tells the story.


Do you mean this book?
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Substance-Inside-Order-Peter-Hook/dp/1471132404/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1471461992&sr=1-1&keywords=peter+hook

According to Amazon it's not out yet?

Or did you mean this?
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Hacienda-How-Not-Run-Club/dp/184739177X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1471462140&sr=1-1&keywords=peter+hook+how


Hey FB, I am not familiar with that Hacienda book, have you read it?
Yeah, I was more concerned with this giant 700 page thing just being a gripe tome from Hooky.
What do you think?



 
 Posted:   Aug 17, 2016 - 3:14 PM   
 By:   First Breath   (Member)

I have not read the Hacienda book.

I can't really comment on the new Hook book as it's not out yet. One part of me wants to read it, another part says no.

 
 Posted:   Aug 18, 2016 - 11:37 AM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

Who here has ever seen New Order live? When and where?

I wish I could say that I have. It's especially lamentable since New Order played in Miami in April 1989. Not to make excuses, though I guess that's what this, but my girlfriend at the time purchased tickets for R.E.M., who were also playing that month here, so we ended up seeing them (second row center). A friend of mine did see New Order but didn't have much to say about the show other than iirc the band played "Perfect Kiss" as an encore. He also said it was a rather brief show.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 18, 2016 - 12:58 PM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

Who here has ever seen New Order live? When and where?

I wish I could say that I have. It's especially lamentable since New Order played in Miami in April 1989. Not to make excuses, though I guess that's what this, but my girlfriend at the time purchased tickets for R.E.M., who were also playing that month here, so we ended up seeing them (second row center). A friend of mine did see New Order but didn't have much to say about the show other than iirc the band played "Perfect Kiss" as an encore. He also said it was a rather brief show.


Yes, I just got reading the part in Chapter and Verse where Sumner talks about the 35 minute shows they were doing in the US in the 80's, I can't recall what city, but apparently the crowds rioted they were so upset. The sent the police to protect the band. But apparently at one time it was more the US audiences that expected long shows. Of course with the absurd price of tickets these days I would expect a riot for a 30 minute show.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 18, 2016 - 12:59 PM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

I have not read the Hacienda book.

I can't really comment on the new Hook book as it's not out yet. One part of me wants to read it, another part says no.


yeah me too

 
 Posted:   Aug 18, 2016 - 2:06 PM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

Who here has ever seen New Order live? When and where?

I wish I could say that I have. It's especially lamentable since New Order played in Miami in April 1989. Not to make excuses, though I guess that's what this, but my girlfriend at the time purchased tickets for R.E.M., who were also playing that month here, so we ended up seeing them (second row center). A friend of mine did see New Order but didn't have much to say about the show other than iirc the band played "Perfect Kiss" as an encore. He also said it was a rather brief show.


Yes, I just got reading the part in Chapter and Verse where Sumner talks about the 35 minute shows they were doing in the US in the 80's, I can't recall what city, but apparently the crowds rioted they were so upset. The sent the police to protect the band. But apparently at one time it was more the US audiences that expected long shows. Of course with the absurd price of tickets these days I would expect a riot for a 30 minute show.


They did a longer show than that.
Also on the same bill: Echo and The Bunnymen (who failed to play "Bring on the Dancing Horses" !!!!)
wow!

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 18, 2016 - 2:23 PM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

Marshall

I would happily pay for almost any length of N.O. show.
Hopefully at least an hour.

Cheers

 
 Posted:   Aug 18, 2016 - 2:25 PM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

Marshall

I would happily pay for almost any length of N.O. show.
Hopefully at least an hour.

Cheers


That is what I remember it being approx.
smile
brm

 
 Posted:   Aug 20, 2016 - 1:40 PM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

I started reading this mid-book.*

Sumner discusses the music he heard in NY -Moroder, Summer- that were the big influences on his turn to electronic dance music. This is the kind of material I really appreciate reading. What makes NO so great, and innovative, is their ability to make great dance records for people who hated Disco!!! In other words, they rocked; and wrote great songs with a danceable groove.

brm

*I was never a part of the Joy Division 'cult'. I always found the obsession with Curtis' suicide unseemly, morbid, and a bit perverse. But hey, that's just me

 
 Posted:   Aug 23, 2016 - 9:12 AM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

I started reading this mid-book.*

Sumner discusses the music he heard in NY -Moroder, Summer- that were the big influences on his turn to electronic dance music. This is the kind of material I really appreciate reading. What makes NO so great, and innovative, is their ability to make great dance records for people who hated Disco!!! In other words, they rocked; and wrote great songs with a danceable groove.

brm

*I was never a part of the Joy Division 'cult'. I always found the obsession with Curtis' suicide unseemly, morbid, and a bit perverse. But hey, that's just me


I was never interested in Ian's suicide; It's a damn waste that he killed himself.

I suppose I was one of those who didn't like Disco, but then New Order were musically a cut above other electronic dance groups in that they had an actual bass player. Their first album, Movement, sounded to me like what Joy Division may have ended up sounding like had Ian lived.

Plus, their lyrics, while minimalist, were always interesting. Compare their first few albums to, say, Depeche Mode's, and the latter sound trite, especially during the brief Vince Clarke era.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 24, 2016 - 5:09 AM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

Jim

From what I can gather Ian's suicide is probably related to his epilepsy and depression, and those were made 10 fold worse by the lifestyle they were living, not much sleep, a lot of drinking. Sumner described at least one time when Ian was seizing on stage and they got him off to complete the episode. I am sure that the stress of being in the band and his seizures caused him a lot of difficulty. I am not saying he had a 'good reason' to kill himself, but there were circumstances that made him feel pretty terrible, it was not out of the blue.

 
 Posted:   Aug 24, 2016 - 2:09 PM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

" I suppose I was one of those who didn't like Disco, but then New Order were musically a cut above other electronic dance groups in that they had an actual bass player. Their first album, Movement, sounded to me like what Joy Division may have ended up sounding like had Ian lived."

yeah.

Joy Division's "Atmospheres" is mos def proto NO
The problem with JD is Curtis couldn't sing a lick. Ironic then, that Sumner- who never sang before -evolved into a fine vocalist
brm

 
 Posted:   Aug 25, 2016 - 10:25 AM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)


The problem with JD is Curtis couldn't sing a lick. Ironic then, that Sumner- who never sang before -evolved into a fine vocalist
brm


It's (post)punk music; singing technically well or whatever was never a consideration. Yet despite this, Ian had a distnctive and memorable voice--he was even a crooner in many of those JD songs!

 
 Posted:   Aug 25, 2016 - 12:37 PM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

It's (post)punk music; singing technically well or whatever was never a consideration. Yet despite this, Ian had a distnctive and memorable voice--


...Which I will take ANY day over trained, "proper" singing--in any genre.

(But I have 2 exceptions--Gordon Lightfoot & Streisand. big grin)

 
 Posted:   Aug 25, 2016 - 4:04 PM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)


The problem with JD is Curtis couldn't sing a lick. Ironic then, that Sumner- who never sang before -evolved into a fine vocalist
brm


It's (post)punk music; singing technically well or whatever was never a consideration. Yet despite this, Ian had a distnctive and memorable voice--he was even a crooner in many of those JD songs!


There are plenty of 'bad' singers who I enjoy - Neil Young, Bob Dylan, Johnny Rotten....
David Byrnes wasn't a good singer either but he occasionally delivered a memorable vocal performance e.g "Pyscho Killer"
Curtis' attempt at a croon was awful - he seemed to be attempting a Jim Morrison type attitude- and he could not even sing in key. I am sorry, but he brought the music down
brm

 
 Posted:   Aug 25, 2016 - 5:16 PM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

Curtis' attempt at a croon was awful - he seemed to be attempting a Jim Morrison type attitude- and he could not even sing in key.


Maybe so, but can we be certain that it wasn't a stylistic choice?

 
 Posted:   Aug 25, 2016 - 6:40 PM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

Inspiration from the Most Unlikely Places Dept.

"Love Will Tear Us Apart", Joy Division's tribute to Sinatra. Legend has it that when they recorded the song, Tony Wilson, their label boss, sat down Curtis and made him listen to Frank Sinatra for hours to try and inspire a vocal performance of equal grandeur and tragedy."





Bruce needs to read my previous posts where all is exlplained.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.