Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
This is a comments thread about Blog Post: The Restoration of 1941 Plus: A Talk with Mike Matessino by Andy Dursin
 
 Posted:   Oct 22, 2014 - 11:48 PM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

Even more disappointing than the release of DUEL in a 1.85 ratio rather than a 1.33 ratio is Universal's continued failure to give us the original 74-minute television version of the film in addition to the ubiquitous 90-minute expanded theatrical version. As one who has seen both versions, I continue to believe that the original, shorter version is a tauter, more exciting experience than the padded theatrical cut.


 
 
 Posted:   Oct 23, 2014 - 1:16 AM   
 By:   jef29bow   (Member)

Even more disappointing than the release of DUEL in a 1.85 ratio rather than a 1.33 ratio is Universal's continued failure to give us the original 74-minute television version of the film in addition to the ubiquitous 90-minute expanded theatrical version. As one who has seen both versions, I continue to believe that the original, shorter version is a tauter, more exciting experience than the padded theatrical cut.



I couldn't agree more. PLEASE give us the original television version!!!!

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 23, 2014 - 7:40 AM   
 By:   Great Escape   (Member)

It probably has very little to do with Universal and everything to do with Spielberg. My guess is that the longer version is the film he wanted to make and the original was his compromise to fit a time slot for the network that commissioned it.

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 23, 2014 - 11:52 AM   
 By:   henry   (Member)

Spielberg is my favorite director. And I am quite pleased with the Blu-ray aspect ratio and the longer version. Just skip passed the extended scenes if you don't like them, atleast they're there if you want them. I'm very pleased with the whole set, I love it! Now we need MUNICH and AMAZING STORIES!

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 4, 2016 - 10:48 PM   
 By:   Nexus6BT   (Member)

Thought I'd bump this thread, as my question seems relevant to the music editing of 1941. This is probably a weird and nit-picky question, but I was wondering if anyone else had noticed it.

One of my favorite scenes in 1941 is when Kelso starts singing "The stars at night, are big and bright..." as he's taking aim at Birkhead and Donna over Hollywood Blvd. There are a couple of subdued brass chords that are in tune with him, and then the brass explodes in to the song. On the extended laserdisc and TV airings of the theatrical cut, that second quiet brass chord hits right as Kelso says "big," but on the Blu-ray (both cuts) and an old VHS I have (I apparently have too many copies of this movie), the chord comes slightly (but noticeably) after he says "big."

Having it hit on "big" seems more musically accurate to me, but I don't know which one is actually correct, but the two are definitely different. Could this have been a difference between the 35mm and 70mm sound mixes, maybe?

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.