Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2015 - 10:55 AM   
 By:   dragon53   (Member)

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 28

INDIANA JONES---Walt Disney Pictures is in early talks with Chris Pratt to replace Harrison Ford in the reboot movie. Pratt's next movie is co-starring in the remake of THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN with Denzel Washington.





INDEPENDENCE DAY 2---Liam Hemsworth has been offered a lead role in the sequel. Bill Pullman and Jeff Goldblum have said they are returning for the sequel.

CHILD 44---trailer released for the movie based on the novel about a Soviet military policeman seeking to stop a serial killer who preys on children. Tom Hardy, Gary Oldman and Noomi Rapace star.

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uia6y9SRsj4


GHOSTBUSTERS---director Paul Feig said the reboot movie cast is Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, Leslie Jones and Kate McKinnon.

USS INDIANAPOLIS---Tate Taylor (THE HELP) will direct the Robert Downey, Jr. untitled World War II movie about the sinking of the cruiser USS Indianapolis by a Japanese submarine after it had delivered components of the atomic bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima. Of the ship's crew of 1,196, about 900 survived the sinking and remained in shark-infested waters for four days. Only 316 were rescued. The movie will feature 11-year-old Hunter Scott's campaign to posthumously exonerate the cruiser's skipper, Capt. Charles McVay, who was court-martialed for the sinking. The Indianapolis sinking was made famous in the movie JAWS.





TED 2---poster released for the sequel which stars Mark Wahlberg, Amanda Seyfried and Jessica Barth.





RAY DONOVAN---Katie Holmes will have a recurring role as the daughter of a billionaire producer played by Ian McShane.

MY COUSIN RACHEL---movie underway based on the Daphne Du Maurier novel in which an orphan seeks revenge against his beautiful cousin who may killed his guardian until he falls in love with her.

PASSENGERS---Morten Tyldum (THE IMITATION GAME) is in talks to direct this sci fi movie set on board a spaceship's 120-year to colonize a distant planet. A mechanic's hibernation pod malfunctions during the voyage which awakens him from deep sleep. He then awakens a beautiful passenger for companionship.

TOGETHERNESS---HBO renewed the sitcom for Season 2.

DARKMOUTH---movie underway on the upcoming fantasy novels in which a boy follows in his father's footsteps to fight monsters that threaten mankind.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2015 - 1:25 PM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

Chris Pratt as Indiana Jones is super boring, safe and predictable, but not very exciting.

 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2015 - 1:32 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Chris Pratt as Indiana Jones is super boring, safe and predictable, but not very exciting.

We usually see things eye to eye. But I actually think he's a good choice. I never saw Guardians but he seems like a likeable "character", and has that twinkle in his eye Ford had. I can think of far, far, far worse choices. And I'll take this any day over grandpa Jones which is just too weird for words.

 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2015 - 1:34 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

INDEPENDENCE DAY 2---Liam Hemsworth has been offered a lead role in the sequel. Bill Pullman and Jeff Goldblum have said they are returning for the sequel.

How do you shoehorn in Bill Pullman? Did he become King of the United States after the invasion?

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2015 - 2:09 PM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

Chris Pratt as Indiana Jones is super boring, safe and predictable, but not very exciting.

We usually see things eye to eye. But I actually think he's a good choice. I never saw Guardians but he seems like a likeable "character", and has that twinkle in his eye Ford had. I can think of far, far, far worse choices. And I'll take this any day over grandpa Jones which is just too weird for words.


Oh we are like the same brain you and I Solium, I really do not have a problem with Chris Pratt, thank goodness - way better than Bradley (rat eye) Cooper.

I guess I was hoping for someone out of left field that is not such a well known name. The combination of really smart kinda nerdy professor adventure guy that Harrison Ford did is not that easy to pull off, I guess I would have to wait to see Chris show some nerd.



 
 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2015 - 2:41 PM   
 By:   Joe E.   (Member)

I love Chris Pratt, but I'm not ready for a reboot yet - I still want a few gaps filled in in the extant chronology - and I'm not up for someone else playing the character in the same age range or point in time as any of the established actors. Ford already has Indy covered from his mid-30s to his late 50s. *Perhaps* if he were Indy between Flanery and Ford, playing Indy in his early 30s pre-Temple of Doom, but I think they could get maybe one movie out of him doing that at most.

Honestly, I'd really much rather see one last Indy adventure with Ford, showing Indy in his 60s or so, perhaps finally letting us know what happened to his eye sometime before he's played by George Hall.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2015 - 2:43 PM   
 By:   Matt S.   (Member)

INDEPENDENCE DAY 2---Liam Hemsworth has been offered a lead role in the sequel. Bill Pullman and Jeff Goldblum have said they are returning for the sequel.

How do you shoehorn in Bill Pullman? Did he become King of the United States after the invasion?


They could explain it by saying martial law was declared and the Constitution was suspended, leading him to remain in office as President long beyond the two-year term limit.

Or....

Maybe he's no longer the President, but has returned to the military as a fighter pilot and/or General.

Or....

Maybe he pulled a Grover Cleveland, and is serving non-consecutive terms...

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2015 - 3:05 PM   
 By:   Thor   (Member)

I love Chris Pratt, but I'm not ready for a reboot yet - I still want a few gaps filled in in the extant chronology - and I'm not up for someone else playing the character in the same age range or point in time as any of the established actors. Ford already has Indy covered from his mid-30s to his late 50s. *Perhaps* if he were Indy between Flanery and Ford, playing Indy in his early 30s pre-Temple of Doom, but I think they could get maybe one movie out of him doing that at most.

Honestly, I'd really much rather see one last Indy adventure with Ford, showing Indy in his 60s or so, perhaps finally letting us know what happened to his eye sometime before he's played by George Hall.


I'm with you! There's plenty of INDYs in Harrison Ford still.

As a continuity junkie, I prefer everything to connect and doing a reboot with Pratt destroys all of that. I also agree that the only way I would condone this is if they made a film that took place between the Flanery and Ford.

 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2015 - 3:32 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

INDEPENDENCE DAY 2---Liam Hemsworth has been offered a lead role in the sequel. Bill Pullman and Jeff Goldblum have said they are returning for the sequel.

How do you shoehorn in Bill Pullman? Did he become King of the United States after the invasion?


They could explain it by saying martial law was declared and the Constitution was suspended, leading him to remain in office as President long beyond the two-year term limit.

Or....

Maybe he's no longer the President, but has returned to the military as a fighter pilot and/or General.

Or....

Maybe he pulled a Grover Cleveland, and is serving non-consecutive terms...


Sure hope it's not a 20 year martial law! The other suggestion seem more feasible. wink

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2015 - 4:07 PM   
 By:   Joe E.   (Member)

Independence Day isn't really something I need more of.

 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2015 - 4:19 PM   
 By:   Justin Boggan   (Member)

I know it seems silly, but after having the story of the Indianapolis engrained into me by "Jaws", I'd love to see a younger sailor named "Quint" on the ship.

 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2015 - 5:50 PM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

I know it seems silly, but after having the story of the Indianapolis engrained into me by "Jaws", I'd love to see a younger sailor named "Quint" on the ship.


That's not silly at all--that's an awesome idea!

 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2015 - 8:04 PM   
 By:   LeHah   (Member)

As to the news about Indiana Jones, I now know what Connery fans felt like when Roger Moore stepped up to play Bond.

The mouse ain't getting my money.

 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2015 - 8:25 PM   
 By:   Mr. Jack   (Member)

I'm with you! There's plenty of INDYs in Harrison Ford still.

The man is SEVENTY-TWO YEARS OLD and managed to break his leg while opening a door on the set of the new Star Wars movie...sad as it might be to admit, he is too old for the role.

 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2015 - 8:41 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

I'm with you! There's plenty of INDYs in Harrison Ford still.

The man is SEVENTY-TWO YEARS OLD and managed to break his leg while opening a door on the set of the new Star Wars movie...sad as it might be to admit, he is too old for the role.


Agreed. He rode off into the sunset in Crusade. Perfect farewell and should have stayed that way.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 29, 2015 - 6:21 AM   
 By:   Joe E.   (Member)

I'm with you! There's plenty of INDYs in Harrison Ford still.

The man is SEVENTY-TWO YEARS OLD and managed to break his leg while opening a door on the set of the new Star Wars movie...sad as it might be to admit, he is too old for the role.


That door was a heavy falling one that would have injured anyone. Seventy-two or not, Harrison is still in great shape.

Moreover, the biggest unexplored area of Indy's life is one in which he's around the same age Harrison now is. If Harrison shouldn't do that, then who should? Are you proposing that they take a younger guy like Chris and ditch him in old age makeup so he can play Indy at age sixty, seventy or eighty?

 
 Posted:   Jan 29, 2015 - 7:54 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

I'm with you! There's plenty of INDYs in Harrison Ford still.

The man is SEVENTY-TWO YEARS OLD and managed to break his leg while opening a door on the set of the new Star Wars movie...sad as it might be to admit, he is too old for the role.


That door was a heavy falling one that would have injured anyone. Seventy-two or not, Harrison is still in great shape.

Moreover, the biggest unexplored area of Indy's life is one in which he's around the same age Harrison now is. If Harrison shouldn't do that, then who should? Are you proposing that they take a younger guy like Chris and ditch him in old age makeup so he can play Indy at age sixty, seventy or eighty?


I think he should act his age. Going on adventures and getting into fist fights at 72 is ridiculous. If they want to do a story about Professor Jones I'm all for it.

 
 Posted:   Jan 29, 2015 - 8:22 AM   
 By:   mstrox   (Member)

I don't think any newly cast Indiana Jones would necessarily need to be a "reboot" - just a recast. A new actor, younger than Harrison Ford, would be able to slot nicely into the timeline established by the first four movies without negating the events of those movies.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 29, 2015 - 8:28 AM   
 By:   Joe E.   (Member)

I think he should act his age. Going on adventures and getting into fist fights at 72 is ridiculous. If they want to do a story about Professor Jones I'm all for it.

It might be ridiculous for most, but not for this character. Remember, we've already seen him in his nineties, and from what we've seen we know he's had at least one physically harrowing adventure sometime after anything in the movies so far. We could at least find out what happened there.



But I'd also be up for a less physical adventure, too. There's room in this series for a movie that's less action-oriented and more about intrigue and suspense and secrets, or even just the thrill of discovery (then again, I freely admit I'd be happy with a movie that were nothing more than two hours of Dr. Jones's classroom lectures put on film, so I know I'm a bit biased).

I don't think any newly cast Indiana Jones would necessarily need to be a "reboot" - just a recast. A new actor, younger than Harrison Ford, would be able to slot nicely into the timeline established by the first four movies without negating the events of those movies.

That'd be great, except that each actor to play Indy so far has covered him at a certain age or age range. It's one thing to accept the differences in actors when each just represents him at a certain time in life, and we can nicely go from Carrier to Phoenix to Flanery to Ford to Hall. It's something else to have two or more representing him in the same time frame, so that if you watch things in order you're alternating between, say, Pratt and Ford, back and forth between them.

Moreover, that era is already pretty well-covered, whereas there's nothing between 1958 and 1992. That's a huge gap, and it's one in which we know interesting things happened but we don't know what they are.

 
 Posted:   Jan 29, 2015 - 8:51 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

But I'd also be up for a less physical adventure, too. There's room in this series for a movie that's less action-oriented and more about intrigue and suspense and secrets, or even just the thrill of discovery (then again, I freely admit I'd be happy with a movie that were nothing more than two hours of Dr. Jones's classroom lectures put on film, so I know I'm a bit biased).


I agree. I think this could really work and you could write an interesting story with interesting characters. But as we know movies are about non stop action, so I don't think we will ever see a mature Indy film.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.