Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Mar 5, 2015 - 2:25 PM   
 By:   Chickenhearted   (Member)

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 5, 2015 - 2:32 PM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

An innovator of modern dance.

 
 Posted:   Mar 5, 2015 - 2:36 PM   
 By:   Recordman   (Member)

What did the European ask when he was trying to get out of the castle?

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 5, 2015 - 2:40 PM   
 By:   Christopher Kinsinger   (Member)

"What did the European ask when he was trying to get out of the castle?"

"IZ-A PORTAL-A?"

big grin

 
 Posted:   Mar 5, 2015 - 2:42 PM   
 By:   mgh   (Member)

Don't get in the car with a scarf.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 5, 2015 - 3:02 PM   
 By:   Christopher Kinsinger   (Member)

"Don't get in the car with a scarf."

I thought it was a motorcycle (?).

 
 Posted:   Mar 7, 2015 - 9:05 AM   
 By:   WILLIAMDMCCRUM   (Member)

I think Vanessa was a bit more alluring than the original:

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 7, 2015 - 4:01 PM   
 By:   John B. Archibald   (Member)

I actually have a souvenir program for this film, apparently a roadshow in Europe.

The video release restored a number of scenes cut for the U.S. version.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 7, 2015 - 4:37 PM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

I actually have a souvenir program for this film, apparently a roadshow in Europe.


As a matter of fact, its initial showing in the U.S. was as a roadshow as well.

In order to qualify for the 1968 Academy awards, the studio opened the film in Los Angeles on 18 December 1968. Although its star was nominated for Best Actress, the picture did not receive any other nominations.

That initial Los Angeles run was as a 177-minute reserved seat attraction. But the picture received a sharply negative review from the Los Angeles Times, as well as near unanimous comments on its overlength, and failed to live up to boxoffice expectations. As a result, the film was cut twice—first by 20 minutes to 157 minutes, then by an additional 26 minutes to 131 minutes. It also underwent a title change in its advertising (although retaining the original title on the screen credits). Finally, it was shifted to a general release, non-roadshow policy, first in Los Angeles and then for all subsequent release dates around the country. The film opened in New York on 27 April 1969 (the New York Times review indicated that the film ran 128 minutes).

Various other running times have been reported for the film. Leonard Maltin’s book claims that the film’s original running time was 168 minutes. When it opened in London on 4 March 1969, it reportedly ran 138 minutes. The film was copyrighted at a length of 136 minutes. And reportedly, in 1987, the director prepared a special cut of the film for television showings, running at a length of 153 minutes. Supposedly this version was televised by the Bravo cable channel, with some minor editing of nudity. Although the IMDB claims that this also was the only version released on video, a check of the stated running times of various versions available on Amazon suggests otherwise:

British PAL VHS (MCA Universal) – 153 minutes
French Region 2 DVD – 144 minutes
British Region 2 DVD (Odeon Entertainment, 2011) - 134 minutes
U.S. VHS (Universal, 1992) - 131 minutes
Korean DVD – 131 minutes

By my count, that's ten different reported running times for the film.

 
 Posted:   Mar 10, 2015 - 6:55 AM   
 By:   Chickenhearted   (Member)

An innovator of modern dance.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 10, 2015 - 3:14 PM   
 By:   philiperic   (Member)

I actually have a souvenir program for this film, apparently a roadshow in Europe.


As a matter of fact, its initial showing in the U.S. was as a roadshow as well.

In order to qualify for the 1968 Academy awards, the studio opened the film in Los Angeles on 18 December 1968. Although its star was nominated for Best Actress, the picture did not receive any other nominations.

That initial Los Angeles run was as a 177-minute reserved seat attraction. But the picture received a sharply negative review from the Los Angeles Times, as well as near unanimous comments on its overlength, and failed to live up to boxoffice expectations. As a result, the film was cut twice—first by 20 minutes to 157 minutes, then by an additional 26 minutes to 131 minutes. It also underwent a title change in its advertising (although retaining the original title on the screen credits). Finally, it was shifted to a general release, non-roadshow policy, first in Los Angeles and then for all subsequent release dates around the country. The film opened in New York on 27 April 1969 (the New York Times review indicated that the film ran 128 minutes).

Various other running times have been reported for the film. Leonard Maltin’s book claims that the film’s original running time was 168 minutes. When it opened in London on 4 March 1969, it reportedly ran 138 minutes. The film was copyrighted at a length of 136 minutes. And reportedly, in 1987, the director prepared a special cut of the film for television showings, running at a length of 153 minutes. Supposedly this version was televised by the Bravo cable channel, with some minor editing of nudity. Although the IMDB claims that this also was the only version released on video, a check of the stated running times of various versions available on Amazon suggests otherwise:

British PAL VHS (MCA Universal) – 153 minutes
French Region 2 DVD – 144 minutes
British Region 2 DVD (Odeon Entertainment, 2011) - 134 minutes
U.S. VHS (Universal, 1992) - 131 minutes
Korean DVD – 131 minutes

By my count, that's ten different reported running times for the film.


thanks Bob for all the info
in theaters I only saw the cut version -- LOVES OF ISADORA- I loved Redgrave's performance
But it wasn't until I saw the VHS release that I released what a great film it almost was -- the original - at least what I found on the US VHS directors cut of 153 minutes is MUCH better - the entire narrative structure has been severely compromised by all the major cuts ...
I dont know why the British version is only 134 m -- it is being released in May at 140 minutes -- still 20 plus minutes shorter than the Directors version. And Karel Reisz died in 2002.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 10, 2015 - 5:32 PM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

I dont know why the British version is only 134 m -- it is being released in May at 140 minutes -- still 20 plus minutes shorter than the Directors version. And Karel Reisz died in 2002.


Per my listing of releases above, the British PAL VHS version from MCA/Universal ran 153 minutes--the full length of the director's cut.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 11, 2015 - 1:24 AM   
 By:   philiperic   (Member)

I was referring to the UK dvd that runs 134 m. - it is definitly not the one Reisz prepared in 1992. A British blu-ray comes out in May with a 140 m. running time listed, almost 25 m. shorter than the US VHS .

 
 Posted:   Mar 11, 2015 - 1:39 PM   
 By:   gsteven   (Member)

The US network television premier was broadcast over two evenings and restored most (if not all) of the cut footage, apart from a few seocnds of nudity. NICHOLAS AND ALEXANDRA received the same treatment on television, but the restored footage was not available again until the DVD release.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 11, 2015 - 4:04 PM   
 By:   philiperic   (Member)

The US network television premier was broadcast over two evenings and restored most (if not all) of the cut footage, apart from a few seocnds of nudity. NICHOLAS AND ALEXANDRA received the same treatment on television, but the restored footage was not available again until the DVD release.

I wish I had a copy of that broadcast - I imagine that was before I owned a VCR . Do you know the running time ?

There were quite a few of those extended two night showings back in the 70s and 80s - some of that footage hasn't been seen since.

 
 Posted:   Mar 11, 2015 - 5:50 PM   
 By:   gsteven   (Member)

I wish I had a copy of that broadcast - I imagine that was before I owned a VCR . Do you know the running time ? .

Before VCR indeed; I recorded this on audio cassette! Sorry, I never counted the running time.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 11, 2015 - 11:20 PM   
 By:   philiperic   (Member)

I probably recorded it too - on a reel to reel tape. I am guessing that it premiered on tv in the mid 70s or so. I used that method to record countless films, tv shows, specials, news, etc. Now those tapes seem like some ancient,obsolete way of preservation. Most of them are packed away in boxes probably never to be heard again -- and there is some rare stuff on them. But I never found a reason or a method for transferring some to another format.. o well, I enjoyed them back in the day

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.