Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2015 - 7:25 PM   
 By:   Chickenhearted   (Member)

 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2015 - 8:06 PM   
 By:   Recordman   (Member)

Pete repeat

[EDIT: Actually the way the question goes is:"Pete and Repeat sat on a fence. Pete fell off. Who was left?"]

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2015 - 8:34 PM   
 By:   HarryRA   (Member)

Suppose you knew who you had been in your previous life. Where you had lived.....whom you had loved and how you had died. What then?

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2015 - 8:40 PM   
 By:   Christopher Kinsinger   (Member)

I'm completely in the dark on this one...

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2015 - 8:47 PM   
 By:   MI6   (Member)

One of the Goldsmith's scores from the seventies that is not out on cd yet. Hope this title would get a proper Region 1/Region A release on dvd/blu-ray soon.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 18, 2015 - 2:33 AM   
 By:   CinemaScope   (Member)

Now that's what I call art smile

She could have someone's eye out with those!

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 18, 2015 - 3:36 AM   
 By:   Angelillo   (Member)

That's a hell of a sexy Charles Martel defeating the Sarrazin !

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 18, 2015 - 7:32 AM   
 By:   Graham Watt   (Member)

"Ludicrous and offensive semi-remake of the utterly charming Leslie Howard vehicle BERKELEY SQUARE (1933), with none of the earlier film's tasteful panache. This time round we have a "modern" take on the story, filled with distateful shots of a man in swimming trunks being tormented by "visions" of a supposed "earlier incarnation." Why anyone would be at all interested in watching this so-called "supernatural" mumbo-jumbo is beyond me, although these things apparently connect with the "young crowd" of cinema-goers, who would probably run a mile from a Leslie Howard film, just because of its lack of nudity and violence. As a sign of the times, there was actually a sexually explicit poster designed, highlighting a lady's nipples, which had nothing to do with the film, but which got the "free love" generation swarming to the cinema in the hope of seeing some pornography. The irony is that the only explicit pornography in the film is the lengthy shot of the man "swimming" in a pool, his tight "swimming trunks" clinging to his beautifully-formed buttocks in a most delightful manner. And sometimes he doesn't even seem to be wearing anything at all."

(Lezzie Dawson-Creek Halibut - "Nickelodeon: In For a Penny" - Trouser Press Books, 1976)

 
 Posted:   May 2, 2015 - 2:12 AM   
 By:   Chickenhearted   (Member)

Pete repeat

[EDIT: Actually the way the question goes is:"Pete and Repeat sat on a fence. Pete fell off. Who was left?"]


 
 
 Posted:   May 6, 2015 - 7:41 PM   
 By:   Christopher Kinsinger   (Member)

"...there was actually a sexually explicit poster designed, highlighting a lady's nipples, which had nothing to do with the film…"

Well, YEAH!
I've seen this film numerous times, and that poster had NOTHING to do with it!

Chickenhearted…I'm beginning to think you have a dark side…

big grin

 
 Posted:   May 6, 2015 - 8:38 PM   
 By:   msmith   (Member)

I read the novel way back in 1975.
The poster must have used the boat scene taken from the book where her bathrobe opens to reveal her nakedness as she raises her arms to hit her lover in the "balls" with the oar.

 
 Posted:   May 8, 2015 - 4:36 PM   
 By:   Sir David of Garland   (Member)

Since actors with bodies like Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman were few and far between back then, they hired a professional male model (Tony Stefano) to provide the nudeness.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.