FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM

LOG IN Forgot Login? Register General Discussion • Trading Post • Non-Film Score Discussion  Profile • Preferences • Community Rules • Help/Contact • Search Board Search Terms:  Search Within:  topics posts since 2019 2018 posts 2017 posts 2016 posts 2015 posts 2014 posts 2013 posts 2012 posts 2011 posts 2010 posts 2009 posts 2008 posts 2007 posts 2006 posts 2005 posts 2004 posts 2003 posts 2002 posts 2001 posts 2000 posts users  search tips  You must log in or register to post.   Go to page:  1 2 3      General Discussion: Pan is going to get "PAN'D"     1 2 3    NEXT   LAST   Last Post   Posted:   Sep 20, 2015 - 11:20 AM     By:   townerbarry   (Member) SPOILERS KIDDIES! We all know when a Studio gives a film and new release date...that means a mega bomb is coming...Jupiter Decending, comes to mind. But hang onto your Wigs and Keys...Pan is about to land into our movie houses and lay a big ol rotten egg. IT rips off so many films...Every Studio should sue this new turkey call Pan. You all thought Steven Spielberg's Hook was over blown, over directed, over produced, well hell..this new Pan makes Spielberg's Hook look damn good. LOL. This is an over everything. No sense of wonderment, or awe and inspiring effort. You come away feeling that everyone in Pan is CREEPY. Who approved this mess? And to top this all off...John Powell Music sounds like John Williams Greatest Hits! Stealing a quote from a critic. It is Over blown..It truly hurt my ears! It is too loud and too pompous. And you thought The Bored of Rings cameras never stopped moving...Pan's Two Cinematographers cannot stop moving the cameras. Endless...movement...You will want to get off this ride from the start! lol.    Posted:   Sep 20, 2015 - 11:30 AM     By:   films1   (Member) Glad you were able to get this off your chest ...    Posted:   Sep 20, 2015 - 11:37 AM     By:   townerbarry   (Member) Glad you were able to get this off your chest ... Trust Me...I held Back. IT was one of the most Joyless Films of all time. lol    Posted:   Sep 20, 2015 - 11:37 AM     By:   townerbarry   (Member) dp    Posted:   Sep 20, 2015 - 11:49 AM     By:   SchiffyM   (Member) Hope springing eternal, the studio has already commissioned scripts for not one but two sequels to this. I kid you not.    Posted:   Sep 20, 2015 - 11:53 AM     By:   Sigerson Holmes   (Member) That's pretty good. I think Josh Trank's FANTASTIC 4 only has one sequel greenlit.    Posted:   Sep 20, 2015 - 11:59 AM     By:   Mike Esssss   (Member) SPOILERS KIDDIES! We all know when a Studio gives a film and new release date...that means a mega bomb is coming...Jupiter Decending, comes to mind. But hang onto your Wigs and Keys...Pan is about to land into our movie houses and lay a big ol rotten egg. IT rips off so many films...Every Studio should sue this new turkey call Pan. You all thought Steven Spielberg's Hook was over blown, over directed, over produced, well hell..this new Pan makes Spielberg's Hook look damn good. LOL. This is an over everything. No sense of wonderment, or awe and inspiring effort. You come away feeling that everyone in Pan is CREEPY. Who approved this mess? And to top this all off...John Powell Music sounds like John Williams Greatest Hits! Stealing a quote from a critic. It is Over blown..It truly hurt my ears! It is too loud and too pompous. And you thought The Bored of Rings cameras never stopped moving...Pan's Two Cinematographers cannot stop moving the cameras. Endless...movement...You will want to get off this ride from the start! lol. In other words: "Directed by Joe Wright"    Posted:   Sep 20, 2015 - 2:35 PM     By:   jamesluckard   (Member) I've loved everything of Wright's that I have seen (Anna Karenina, Hanna, Atonement, Pride & Prejudice), and I tend to actually enjoy movies that many people think are garish, OTT messes, so I'm still looking forward to this    Posted:   Sep 20, 2015 - 2:46 PM     By:   No Respectable Gentleman   (Member) Are you Alonso Duralde? http://www.thewrap.com/pan-review-hugh-jackman-rooney-mara-garrett-hedlund/    Posted:   Sep 20, 2015 - 4:05 PM     By:   riotengine   (Member) Glad you were able to get this off your chest ... Trust Me...I held Back. IT was one of the most Joyless Films of all time. lol So how did you come to see this? Advance screening? Greg Espinoza    Posted:   Sep 20, 2015 - 4:25 PM     By:   BornOfAJackal   (Member) If this movie offers up Rooney Mara in as miscast and garish a presentation as she gave in The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (American version), I might fall in love with her even more. No one fans the flames of my inner desire like a sexy girl from a wealthy family who's doin' Hollywood. Nothin' like sultry, snotty entitlement for this guy!    Posted:   Sep 20, 2015 - 7:21 PM     By:   Bond1965   (Member) I've loved everything of Wright's that I have seen (Anna Karenina, Hanna, Atonement, Pride & Prejudice), and I tend to actually enjoy movies that many people think are garish, OTT messes, so I'm still looking forward to this Sorry James, I'll be watching this via Netflix. It looks a mess. James    Posted:   Sep 20, 2015 - 7:22 PM     By:   Bond1965   (Member) Are you Alonso Duralde? http://www.thewrap.com/pan-review-hugh-jackman-rooney-mara-garrett-hedlund/ No he's not. I know because Alonso is actually a friend of mine. James    Posted:   Sep 21, 2015 - 6:02 AM     By:   Solium   (Member) Sounds like I'm gonna love the score! Though the film looks cringe worthy.    Posted:   Sep 21, 2015 - 7:00 AM     By:   John B. Archibald   (Member) Hope springing eternal, the studio has already commissioned scripts for not one but two sequels to this. I kid you not. Well, apparently, not one, but two sequels were planned for JOHN CARTER as well. And we all know where that ended up....    Posted:   Sep 21, 2015 - 9:02 AM     By:   Ado   (Member) I would encourage any lovers of Peter Pan to pass on this latest one and watch the terrific PJ Hogan version from 2003. It is truly fantastic and gorgeous on Blu-Ray, has some pretty good actors, good set work, charming effects, it is light in spirit and has a lovely little love story. It is a really underrated movie.    Posted:   Sep 21, 2015 - 9:26 AM     By:   SchiffyM   (Member) Hope springing eternal, the studio has already commissioned scripts for not one but two sequels to this. I kid you not. Well, apparently, not one, but two sequels were planned for JOHN CARTER as well. And we all know where that ended up.... Oh absolutely. I've been wrong before, but I would be shocked if "Pan" did anywhere near the business it would need to justify a sequel. I only mentioned it because it shows how much of a machine the studios have become as far as these blockbusters go -- they have to be prepared the green-light a sequel the moment the opening grosses come in.    Posted:   Sep 21, 2015 - 9:37 AM     By:   Dana Wilcox   (Member) If this movie offers up Rooney Mara in as miscast and garish a presentation as she gave in The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (American version), I might fall in love with her even more. The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo (American version) had an 86% positive critics' rating on Rotten Tomatoes, with much very positive comment about Rooney Mara's "total role commitment" in the starring role. Your POV is interesting, but doesn't have much support (though of course you have every right to it). I thought she was terrific, and was not surprised to see that the critics agreed.    Posted:   Sep 21, 2015 - 11:40 AM     By:   Luc Van der Eeken   (Member) I hate topics like this...where people get their knives out before having seen the film, actually wanting/wishing a movie to fail. I don't get that. I'll make up my own mind, thank you very much. And that means giving the movie a fair go. I'm sure I'll like the score, samples sound marvelous.    Posted:   Sep 22, 2015 - 3:36 AM     By:   pp312   (Member) I would encourage any lovers of Peter Pan to pass on this latest one and watch the terrific PJ Hogan version from 2003. It is truly fantastic and gorgeous on Blu-Ray, has some pretty good actors, good set work, charming effects, it is light in spirit and has a lovely little love story. It is a really underrated movie. Totally agree. The 2003 version was definitive for me, rendering moot all others (particularly those offering us grown women masquerading as adolescent boys). As much as I had a mental image of Pan, Jeremy Sumpter was about as close as you could get, and struck just the right note of innocence and determined cunning. An underappreciated performance and a very underrated film.     General Discussion: Pan is going to get "PAN'D"    < 1 2 3  > >>  Go to page:  1 2 3   First Post    General Discussion • Trading Post • Non-Film Score Discussion  Profile • Preferences • Community Rules • Help/Contact • Search Board You must log in or register to post.   Go to page:  1 2 3

© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved. Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.