Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Nov 18, 2015 - 3:23 PM   
 By:   cody1949   (Member)

Of course there are beautiful exceptions, but they are far too few in number these days. I like being a warrior. Those who are afraid to say what they think will go down with a sinking ship.

So I guess I'll play this game: how many beautiful exceptions are too few in number for you? I agree that the *percentage* is unfortunately diminished, but so much music gets written and recorded for film that even if only 5% of it is good, that's still more wonderful music than I could regularly tackle in a year, even aside from all the great music of the past which is continually coming out.

I think history has shown us that the mentality of diplomacy has done more good for any cause in the long one than a warrior mentality does. I'm not saying you should be afraid to say what you think, but making blanket statements about today's music being droning and soulless only reveals an ignorant and close-minded point of view. Maybe you should inform yourself better. But it's probably easier to just dismiss it all while hardly listening to any of it.

How many good scores per year is no longer "too few" to result in you changing your attitude on the matter. Tell me and I will attempt to supply you with that number.

Yavar


Yavar, there is no doubt that you want to be an ambassador of good will that bridges the gap between the music of years ago and today. Good luck to you, but I don't think it will happen.
Musical tastes are formed early in life. If you like the music of today say so. If you don't like the "music" of today say so. I will continue to call the music of today as noise; knowing full well that there are exceptions to the rule. I do not have to qualify every time I call the music of today as noise that there are exceptions. You are very learned and serious man, but loosen up a little. Try to have some fun.
Without getting political as this message board forbids, sometimes diplomacy doesn't work. Take care and always feel free to be yourself.


















 
 
 Posted:   Nov 18, 2015 - 3:42 PM   
 By:   PFK   (Member)

Of course there are beautiful exceptions, but they are far too few in number these days. I like being a warrior. Those who are afraid to say what they think will go down with a sinking ship.

So I guess I'll play this game: how many beautiful exceptions are too few in number for you? I agree that the *percentage* is unfortunately diminished, but so much music gets written and recorded for film that even if only 5% of it is good, that's still more wonderful music than I could regularly tackle in a year, even aside from all the great music of the past which is continually coming out.

I think history has shown us that the mentality of diplomacy has done more good for any cause in the long one than a warrior mentality does. I'm not saying you should be afraid to say what you think, but making blanket statements about today's music being droning and soulless only reveals an ignorant and close-minded point of view. Maybe you should inform yourself better. But it's probably easier to just dismiss it all while hardly listening to any of it.

How many good scores per year is no longer "too few" to result in you changing your attitude on the matter. Tell me and I will attempt to supply you with that number.

Yavar


Yavar, there is no doubt that you want to be an ambassador of good will that bridges the gap between the music of years ago and today. Good luck to you, but I don't think it will happen.
Musical tastes are formed early in life. If you like the music of today say so. If you don't like the "music" of today say so. I will continue to call the music of today as noise; knowing full well that there are exceptions to the rule. I do not have to qualify every time I call the music of today as noise that there are exceptions. You are very learned and serious man, but loosen up a little. Try to have some fun.
Without getting political as this message board forbids, sometimes diplomacy doesn't work. Take care and always feel free to be yourself.




I don't like the "music" of today! smile

 
 Posted:   Nov 18, 2015 - 3:50 PM   
 By:   Yavar Moradi   (Member)

I am being myself, which is why I'm speaking up. And you didn't answer my question: how many good scores do you need, to stop doing things like putting "music" in quotation marks?

Yavar

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 18, 2015 - 4:01 PM   
 By:   cody1949   (Member)

I am being myself, which is why I'm speaking up. And you didn't answer my question: how many good scores do you need, to stop doing things like putting "music" in quotation marks?

Yavar


Yavar, I DON'T have to stop doing anything you don't like [ period.]

 
 Posted:   Nov 18, 2015 - 10:30 PM   
 By:   Amer Zahid   (Member)

Of course there are beautiful exceptions, but they are far too few in number these days. I like being a warrior. Those who are afraid to say what they think will go down with a sinking ship.

So I guess I'll play this game: how many beautiful exceptions are too few in number for you? I agree that the *percentage* is unfortunately diminished, but so much music gets written and recorded for film that even if only 5% of it is good, that's still more wonderful music than I could regularly tackle in a year, even aside from all the great music of the past which is continually coming out.

I think history has shown us that the mentality of diplomacy has done more good for any cause in the long one than a warrior mentality does. I'm not saying you should be afraid to say what you think, but making blanket statements about today's music being droning and soulless only reveals an ignorant and close-minded point of view. Maybe you should inform yourself better. But it's probably easier to just dismiss it all while hardly listening to any of it.

How many good scores per year is no longer "too few" to result in you changing your attitude on the matter. Tell me and I will attempt to supply you with that number.

Yavar


Come on. Movies are so much different today. Everything has changed. The soundtrack is dominated by multi layers of overwhelming sound effects. The composer is forced to forgo many artistic postulation for the director and the producers whim to sound exactly like the last score they liked. Its totally studio controlled. You don't have much liberty or license to dictate your artistic choices (not unless you are John Williams, Hans Zimmer or James Horner) And if you do you are shown the door. Todays movie aesthetics have forced the composers to compose in very restricted modes and time slots to compose and produce their music. Thematic structures, tonalities, story narratives, leitmotif quality music that was prevalent right upto late 90's and mid the 21st century is almost gone. The orchestral oomph is gone and replaced with synthesiser, endless drum percussions, filler noises and world music fusions.

I feel so differently today when I go and watch a movie. Apart from an occasional satisfying story development and characterisation there is no real involvement in the film. I try to enjoy the music or be swept but the whole experience, hoping that on way back home, I will be humming the music or at least yearning to go and buy the soundtrack. Well. I hardly feel that now. The mojo is gone from today's music. Its very rare for me to go out and buy a modern day film soundtrack and hardly there are less than 4-5 new albums that I will buy from this years releases. This isn't to say that film music art has declined entirely; some composers old and new occasionally bounce back with a stunning product E.g. Zimmer's INTERSTELLAR. Williams LINCOLN or John Debney's THE STONING OF SORAYA M.

The only great thing I that we are now well into the Golden Age of film music collecting and having most of favourite scores being re-issued, expanded and even re-recorded. The experience is totally different. My buying habits are mostly centred around these re-issues. This majority rules and I'm also constantly discovering more composers and scores from the last 45 years and its a treasure trove. There is real music in there with soul and heart. There is the thematic depth of Miklos Rozsa music, The fury and soul of Bernard Herrmann, the ferocity and dynamics of Jerry Goldsmith to absorb and behold and so on.

The music of all the above mentioned composers and the ones from the Silver and Bronze ages are for me is canon. Its not being 'ignorant or close mindedness' compared to today's artistic development, I feel Hollywood has lost his ears. Its the second coming of 'Tone deafness. I'll say it again, film music of today's cinema doesn't have the pull one used to feel previously. There is no chemistry. No clinical effect, except perhaps visually. You go and see the movie and talk about it. You have become like the other non-soundtrack listening sentient being who would just say when asked about the film music " Oh! You mean that background music?"

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 19, 2015 - 6:50 PM   
 By:   PFK   (Member)

Of course there are beautiful exceptions, but they are far too few in number these days. I like being a warrior. Those who are afraid to say what they think will go down with a sinking ship.

So I guess I'll play this game: how many beautiful exceptions are too few in number for you? I agree that the *percentage* is unfortunately diminished, but so much music gets written and recorded for film that even if only 5% of it is good, that's still more wonderful music than I could regularly tackle in a year, even aside from all the great music of the past which is continually coming out.

I think history has shown us that the mentality of diplomacy has done more good for any cause in the long one than a warrior mentality does. I'm not saying you should be afraid to say what you think, but making blanket statements about today's music being droning and soulless only reveals an ignorant and close-minded point of view. Maybe you should inform yourself better. But it's probably easier to just dismiss it all while hardly listening to any of it.

How many good scores per year is no longer "too few" to result in you changing your attitude on the matter. Tell me and I will attempt to supply you with that number.

Yavar


Come on. Movies are so much different today. Everything has changed. The soundtrack is dominated by multi layers of overwhelming sound effects. The composer is forced to forgo many artistic postulation for the director and the producers whim to sound exactly like the last score they liked. Its totally studio controlled. You don't have much liberty or license to dictate your artistic choices (not unless you are John Williams, Hans Zimmer or James Horner) And if you do you are shown the door. Today movie aesthetics have forced the composers to compose in very restricted modes and time slots to compose and produce their music. Thematic structures, tonalities, story narratives, leitmotif quality music that was prevalent right upto late 90's and mid the 21st century is almost gone. The orchestral oomph is gone and replaced with synthesiser, endless drum percussions, filler noises and world music fusions.

I feel so differently today when I go and watch a movie. Apart from an occasional satisfying story development and characterisation there is no real involvement in the film. I try to enjoy the music or be swept but he whole experience hoping that on way back home, I will be humming the music or at least yearning to go and buy the soundtrack. Well. I hardly feel that now. The mojo is gone from today's music. Its very rare for me to go out and buy a modern day film soundtrack and hardly there are less than 4-5 new albums that I will buy from this years releases. This isn't to say that film music art has declined entirely; some composers old and new occasionally bounce back with a stunning product E.g. Zimmer's INTERSTELLAR. Williams LINCOLN or John Debney's THE STONING OF SORAYA M.

The only great thing I that we are now well into the Golden Age of film music collecting and having most of favourite scores being re-issued, expanded and even re-recorded. The experience is totally different. My buying habits are mostly centred around these re-issues. This majority rules and I'm also constantly discovering more composers and scores from the last 45 years and its a treasure trove. There is real music in there with soul and heart. There is the thematic depth of Miklos Rozsa music, The fury and soul of Bernard Herrmann, the ferocity and dynamics of Jerry Goldsmith to absorb and behold and so one.

The music of all the above mentioned composers and the ones from the Silver and Bronze ages are for me is canon. Its not being 'ignorant or close mindedness' compared to today's artistic development, I feel Hollywood has lost his ears. Its the second coming of 'Tone deafness. I'll say it again, film music of today's cinema doesn't have the pull one used to feel previously. There is no chemistry. No clinical effect, except perhaps visually. You go and see the movie and talk about it. You have become like the other non-soundtrack listening sentient being who would just say when asked about the film music " Oh! You mean that background music?"




Very well said Amer and I agree.

I hope those of you who are reading this thread will also buy VICTOR YOUNG VOL. 2 from Kritzerland when it's issued very shortly now. Quality film score CDs are not that commonplace now and we must support them.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 19, 2015 - 9:14 PM   
 By:   cody1949   (Member)

If you love golden age music that is probably why you are looking at this thread. Well, Victor Young volume 2 is very far from being the epic sounds of THIEF OF BAGDAD by Miklos Rozsa, but it is full of beautiful melodies that characterized golden age music. Glad to have Kritzerland back taking care of us golden age fans, just as James Fitzpatrick and Tadlow are recording scores that we thought we would never hear again on CD.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 19, 2015 - 11:08 PM   
 By:   Tadlow   (Member)

My guess is that this is a Tadlow release, but I could be wrong. What we do know is that there are two more Rozsa projects on the horizon including Thief of Bagdad, and James has said that one will be a Tadlow release and the other will be a Prometheus release because Luc is funding it. I think Thief is the Tadlow one because James announced the title first, meaning he didn't have to wait for someone else's go-ahead. I wonder what the other complete Rozsa reconstruction is...

Yavar


Sorry but you ARE wrong in your assumption

 
 Posted:   Nov 20, 2015 - 12:10 AM   
 By:   Yavar Moradi   (Member)

I didn't make an assumption -- I was very clear about it being a guess and that I could be wrong.

Does that mean you might be willing to drop a clue about the Rozsa title coming out on your own label? smile

Yavar

 
 
 Posted:   Jun 3, 2018 - 8:06 PM   
 By:   davis.hall   (Member)

I think this is a great recording, with well chosen singers. This is a great score, very supportive of the film, with wonderful little connective bits. I'm surprised no one has reviewed it. Dr. Rózsa was really a master.

 
 
 Posted:   Jun 3, 2018 - 9:18 PM   
 By:   Clemens   (Member)

I'm really happy to see that Thief...' is coming our way...and our pockets are shrinking! It is really worth the wait...now, if James were to do some Rozsa film-noir scores, I would like to have a cd of his wonderful score for one of Deanna Durbin's last movies...'Lady On A Train'! Rozsa did not like to do comedies except in rare instances...like this one and 'Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid'. When they were with dramatic overtones, he always came through with sparkling comedic moments! Who knows...

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.