Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Apr 22, 2016 - 8:53 PM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)

I just saw this film for the first time. I had seen clips and of course the stills of Linda Blair and Richard Burton with those electrical things on their heads.

I liked it better than The Exorcist, but then again I have atypical taste in films.

 
 Posted:   Apr 22, 2016 - 11:57 PM   
 By:   David Sones (Allardyce)   (Member)

My first experience with this movie was interesting because I didn't know I had seen it for several years. At some point in 77 when I was 6 years old, I remembered seeing a movie at a drive-in theater with my parents; all of the details escaped me except those surreal point-of-view shots of the flying locust as if you're riding on its back. The images haunted me but I never knew what they were from until about 6 years later when I saw Exorcist II on television. I think I literally pointed at the tv screen and shouted "giant moth! the moth!" In my 6-year old memory, it was a giant moth.

I think the original Exorcist is a superior film in general, but II remains an interesting, LSD-laced, bizarro mind trip that is sometimes visually stunning, odd, frequently boring and compelling at the same time, certainly nonsensical, full of vivid visuals, and all of it is bathed in that gorgeous Morricone music. I find it to be infinitely watchable.

 
 Posted:   Apr 23, 2016 - 11:38 AM   
 By:   BornOfAJackal   (Member)

I agree with Allardyce. I don't think this film, flaws and all, will be truly appreciated until more people see in in big-screen high-definition.

It fulfills my chief criterion for a studio-mandated sequel which is: "I sure as hell wasn't expecting that!"

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 23, 2016 - 2:16 PM   
 By:   Thgil   (Member)

I hated it, but it might be better stoned.

Side note: I didn't like the first one either.

 
 Posted:   Apr 23, 2016 - 3:19 PM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

Its been getting a fairly frequent screening on TCM uk recently.
I caught some of it, but so far havent sat through the whole film so cant judge.
Had the Lp originally. At one time as a young teenager i thought Regans theme was the only listenable track.!!
Ennio at his most atonal. But very effective in the film.

 
 Posted:   Apr 23, 2016 - 3:27 PM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

I saw it in its original release. I'd rather get water boarded than sit through it again. In fact, on some it might have the same affect as water boarding.

 
 Posted:   Apr 23, 2016 - 4:51 PM   
 By:   TominAtl   (Member)

While I will always appreciate Richard Burton and Max Von Sydow and most of John Boormans films, watching this film now is trying at best. It's slow and dull and not the least bit scary to me and truly shows itself as a product of its time. Everyone seems so lifeless in it with their performances.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 23, 2016 - 6:31 PM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

I thought is was tolerable, but obviously it has (and had at its release) nowhere near the impact of the original.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 23, 2016 - 6:59 PM   
 By:   Last Child   (Member)

I saw it in its original release. I'd rather get water boarded than sit through it again. In fact, on some it might have the same affect as water boarding.

Are you sure you arent talking about the original? I'm sure Friedkin would be happy to oblige, given he tortured the cast.

 
 Posted:   Apr 23, 2016 - 7:21 PM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

I saw it in its original release. I'd rather get water boarded than sit through it again. In fact, on some it might have the same affect as water boarding.

Are you sure you arent talking about the original? I'm sure Friedkin would be happy to oblige, given he tortured the cast.


Oh, could I be obnoxious right now!

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 23, 2016 - 8:07 PM   
 By:   Last Child   (Member)

Heh, I'm not dissing the original, only what the director was reported to have done. If art requires a sadist, so be it. And any military drill instructor would agree.wink

 
 Posted:   Apr 23, 2016 - 8:15 PM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

Heh, I'm not dissing the original, only what the director was reported to have done. If art requires a sadist, so be it. And any military drill instructor would agree.wink

Compaired to Otto Preminger?

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 24, 2016 - 7:17 AM   
 By:   Last Child   (Member)

Nobody beats Mr. Freeze!

 
 Posted:   Apr 24, 2016 - 5:23 PM   
 By:   RR   (Member)

Every year, my husband and myself host a New Year's Eve Sober Movie festival. (A lot of my friends are in recovery, and they like it that they've got a place to go alcohol-free.) There's always three movies, with a general theme.

Three or four years ago, the theme was "Sequels Nobody Wanted".

Our line up:
"Beyond the Poseidon Adventure"
"Grease 2"
"Exorcist II: The Heretic"

I actually like all three films. "Beyond..." because it's so entertaining in it's shabbiness; "Grease 2" because there's pure desperation in every frame of it: and, "Exorcist II" because it's actually petty good movie, warts and all. In many ways, it's better than "The Exorcist", which I never found scary to begin with (and yes, I saw it during it's original run). "Exorcist II" also has the distinction of one of having one of the worst performances ever filmed, thanks to Richard Burton. And Morricone's score is terrific.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 25, 2016 - 3:54 AM   
 By:   Graham Watt   (Member)

I actually haven't seen it since its first release. I was in my mid-teens and just beginning to really appreciate films, and in a very kind of "heightened reality" way. I don't quite know what I mean there, but everything seemed larger than life, and more than just a movie.

I was so enthralled by EXORCIST II: THE HERETIC that I spent the entire day in the cinema and watched it three times. I found it absolutely fascinating, really brilliant and hypnotic. I never really understood it, but I never thought that I really had to. Some of my favourite films don't make much sense, but I prefer that to being given the jigsaw with all the pieces already in place.

I'm prepared to admit that I might nor be so impressed if I saw it today, but I think that's probably because I'm just too old and pedantic now. I find it difficult to get carried away on lunatic ideas now, even if they are brilliant. And back then Boorman's film WAS brilliant for me. I almost don't watch to watch it again in case the illusion is shattered.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 25, 2016 - 12:18 PM   
 By:   The Wanderer   (Member)

I bought a book on the making of Exorcist 2 - a little paperback i think was written at the time, after reading that and seeing Boorman interviews and articles about it, i liked it more.

Just like Zardoz, i'm not really much of a fan, but i find some of the visuals really interesting, and once Boorman's commentary puts a bit of the process behind it i seem to appreciate the film a bit more.

Both films are pretty daft, but i find them just about watchable. The story of the making of Exorcist 2 is better than the film.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 9, 2016 - 4:38 PM   
 By:   ZardozSpeaks   (Member)

Hey, Exorcist II - guess what? Italy made L'Esorcista no 2 in 1975 - 2 years before you. smile

 
 Posted:   Nov 13, 2016 - 4:37 PM   
 By:   David Kessler   (Member)

I have had this Movie in my Collection in atleast 20+ years I Think but have never gotten around to Watch it until this year in early October. It did not suck that much that its reputation says...Sure it wasn´t nearly as great as the thirst or third (or even the fourth) but wasn´t that mess it was said to be

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.