Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   May 2, 2016 - 8:39 PM   
 By:   johnjohnson   (Member)

Scream Factory, the horror-thriller offshoot of independent film distributor Shout Factory, has announced that it will release on Blu-ray Philip Kaufman's film Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978), starring Donald Sutherland, Brooke Adams, Jeff Goldblum, Veronica Cartwright, and Leonard Nimoy. The release will be available for purchase on August 2.

http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=18967

 
 Posted:   May 2, 2016 - 10:34 PM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

I'm probably in the minority, but I much prefer the '56 original. This remake never did anything for me.

 
 
 Posted:   May 2, 2016 - 11:06 PM   
 By:   jenkwombat   (Member)

I'm probably in the minority, but I much prefer the '56 original. This remake never did anything for me.

Why would you assume you're in the minority?

 
 
 Posted:   May 2, 2016 - 11:59 PM   
 By:   The Wanderer   (Member)

If this has the excellent commentary they had in the DVD I'll buy it. One of my favourite films.

 
 Posted:   May 3, 2016 - 2:32 AM   
 By:   Nicolai P. Zwar   (Member)

I like the 1956 version, a classic, but I think the 1978 version with Sutherland is on par, it's very creepy, one of the best sci-fi thrillers of the decade.

 
 
 Posted:   May 3, 2016 - 3:09 AM   
 By:   Graham Watt   (Member)

Yes, one of the few remakes which equals, or probably even surpasses, the classic original.

 
 Posted:   May 3, 2016 - 4:26 AM   
 By:   agentMaestraX   (Member)

Enjoyed BOTH versions & love DANA WYTNER in the '56 version!

 
 
 Posted:   May 3, 2016 - 5:28 AM   
 By:   Tall Guy   (Member)

If this has the excellent commentary they had in the DVD I'll buy it. One of my favourite films.


I saw it on its release and I don't think I've seen the whole thing since. I've toyed with the bluray in HMV and if I see it for a few quid less may well take the plunge. An excellent commentary, you say...

(and my favourite Denny Zeitlin score smile)

 
 Posted:   May 3, 2016 - 6:01 AM   
 By:   Ray Faiola   (Member)

Both terrific films. But what gives the 1956 the edge for me is the scene between Kevin McCarthy and Larry Gates about the need for love or emotion. The remake is rather bloodless in this regard.

 
 Posted:   May 3, 2016 - 7:41 AM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

I'm probably in the minority, but I much prefer the '56 original. This remake never did anything for me.

Why would you assume you're in the minority?


It seems to me that we live in a culture that prefers the new over the old. Why do we get so many remakes of movies, especially if they're black & white? I also read a lot of comments about this movie that it's one of the better remakes and as good as the original.

I've read the original Jack Finney novel and it's very good. The '56 original adaptation, as good as it is, still isn't quite as good as the book. The remake, and the other versions since, are even further from the book and in my view muddle the point of the story. There's something about the small town setting of the book and first film version that just works for me in making the mounting paranoia feel more real than in a big city setting. There's just something quaint about about the original version that makes it more interesting to me.

I've also never found Donald Sutherland appealing as a "regular" guy. As an oddball or villian, yes.

 
 Posted:   May 3, 2016 - 8:36 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Loved the original though I don't think I've seen it since the early 70's. All I remember about the remake was a very graphic scene of a head being crushed by a shovel. This was rated PG, right?

 
 
 Posted:   May 3, 2016 - 9:25 AM   
 By:   Last Child   (Member)

I've read the original Jack Finney novel and it's very good. The '56 original adaptation, as good as it is, still isn't quite as good as the book.

The book's climax is pretty anti-climactic, as is the novel for JAWS. A whimper, not a bang.

 
 Posted:   May 3, 2016 - 10:21 AM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

I've read the original Jack Finney novel and it's very good. The '56 original adaptation, as good as it is, still isn't quite as good as the book.

The book's climax is pretty anti-climactic, as is the novel for JAWS. A whimper, not a bang.


It's actually been over thirty years since I read the book, so I don't recall how it ended except that it wasn't like the film, minus the framing device. I also don't mind the framing device in the '56 film version. It worked for me. I didn't see this movie until I was around 16, and then on late night TV. I was all alone in an empty house. The effect of the story and the film's emphatic score actually rattled me so I was afraid to turn out the lights and go to bed.

Of course, the movie has never played that way for me since, but my reaction after seeing the '70s remake in its original theatrical run was "Meh." Like I said, it just didn't do it for me.

 
 
 Posted:   May 3, 2016 - 11:06 AM   
 By:   Last Child   (Member)

The book ends like this: one of the aliens explains that because of the human resistance, they'll leave, and all the pods start floating up into space. And Becky was never replaced by a pod.
Interestingly, Finney said the book was a critique of (American) materialism, not communism.

 
 Posted:   May 3, 2016 - 11:23 AM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

The book ends like this: one of the aliens explains that because of the human resistance, they'll leave, and all the pods start floating up into space. And Becky was never replaced by a pod.
Interestingly, Finney said the book was a critique of (American) materialism, not communism.


Wow, I've completely forgotten that, which may in itself say how dissatisfying that ending is. However, I'm glad to read that Finney's intention was a critique of materialism -- because we certainly need such a critique. I'm continually dismayed by how few realize how empty the "American Dream" of material wealth is.

Anyway, this reminds me, the '56 version is, I think, a critique of the paranoia and harmful effects of the Red Scare, though I've read that its director saw it more as a warning that many people were already living as "Pod People," but what was the '70s version a critique of? The same thing? I'm not sure.

 
 
 Posted:   May 3, 2016 - 11:50 AM   
 By:   Last Child   (Member)

but what was the '70s version a critique of?

Remakes.

Kaufman made it so over-the-top without one ounce of subtly that it sometimes seems like a parody. He was probably perplexed that viewers were scared instead of laughing.

 
 
 Posted:   May 3, 2016 - 1:03 PM   
 By:   The Wanderer   (Member)

I really like the first 3 Body Snatchers films, including Abel Ferrara's army base Body Snatchers (minus one terrible shot of a person falling from a helicopter).

I liked Kauffman's creative choices, which he explains in the commentary. and how the invasion has begun from the first shot you see of earth, with the dustcarts in the street. Each shot seems well thought out.

I used to wonder about the start and how the alien stuff drifts off its planet and then down into our atmosphere without burning up, but they find things attached to spaceshuttles and probes and such all the time.

It's a story i like a lot and i enjoy seeing different interpretations of.

One of my favourite short stories is Philip K Dick's The hanging stranger which is perfectly in line with this and has a great hook and ending.

 
 Posted:   May 3, 2016 - 3:52 PM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

but what was the '70s version a critique of?

Remakes.

Kaufman made it so over-the-top without one ounce of subtly that it sometimes seems like a parody. He was probably perplexed that viewers were scared instead of laughing.


Well, I've actually been holding back on knocking it. Thanks. Glad to know I'm not alone in really not thinking much of it. It's still only the '56 original that matters.

 
 
 Posted:   May 3, 2016 - 5:25 PM   
 By:   Last Child   (Member)

I was annoyed by it when I was a kid, but enjoy it now because it's so absurdly manipulative. How subtle was it to cast the most famous unemotional alien in film history (Nimoy) as an unemotional alien? wink

I recently watched the start with the dvd director commentary which is pretty revealing. Kaufman describes how he did his own $1.98 special effects, which looks about right, pricewise. I was never impressed with the alien world prolog.
And on the soundtrack cd Danny Zeitlin describes how he never composed film music before and was saved by the orchestrator or conductor.

 
 Posted:   May 4, 2016 - 2:22 AM   
 By:   Nicolai P. Zwar   (Member)

[

Why would you assume you're in the minority?


It seems to me that we live in a culture that prefers the new over the old.


Funny, I rather often think it's the opposite: whenever there is a remake of something, voices everywhere questioning why this or that should be remade at all.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.