Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Nov 28, 2016 - 11:22 AM   
 By:   dragon53   (Member)

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 28

WESTWORLD---season finale trailer released.

Trailer link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYkW0HIDN5U



THE VAMPIRE CHRONICLES---Anne Rice is developing a tv series based on her novels after the Universal Studios movie franchise was cancelled, "The theatrical rights to the Vampire Chronicles are once again in my hands, free and clear! I could not be more excited about this! — A television series of the highest quality is now my dream for Lestat, Louis, Armand, Marius and the entire tribe. In this the new Golden Age of television, such a series is THE way to let the entire story of the vampires unfold. — My son Christopher Rice and I will be developing a pilot script and a detailed outline for an open ended series, faithfully presenting Lestat’s story as it is told in the books, complete with the many situations that readers expect to see. We will likely begin with “The Vampire Lestat” and move on from there."

THE ALIENIST---Daniel Bruhl (CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR) and Luke Evans (THE HOBBIT) will star in the TNT series based on the novel about the hunt for a serial killer in 1896 New York.
Bruhl will play psychologist Dr. Laszlo Kreizler, and Evans will play reporter John Moore.





STAR TREK IV: THE VOYAGE HOME---writer Steve Meerson said Eddie Murphy was supposed to play a Berkeley astrophysicist in the sequel, “It was always the same story that approved, but the original draft included a part for Eddie Murphy. Eddie was on the lot at Paramount at the time and arguably was the biggest star in the word. They had told us he was a huge Star Trek fan.”
Meerson said that after the deal fell through, Murphy was replaced by Catherine Hicks and the character was changed, “At the beginning of the process, it was actually a lot of fun. As the process progressed, it became less fun, because it became more political. And I don’t say that with any bitterness. It’s just the way things work in all businesses. We began to feel like at a certain point that this was going to be taken away from us, which in fact, it was.”





ROGUE ONE: A STAR WARS STORY---photo released of Jimmy Smits returning as Bail Organa.





SOLDADO---Jeffrey Donovan commented on the sequel to SICARIO, "The story picks up with the same male characters that were in SICARIO, which was Josh [Brolin] and Benicio [Del Toro]. Emily Blunt’s character is not in it, but my character, Forsing, is also brought back. It focuses on these three characters now, going down into Mexico to basically start a war, on purpose, between the rival Mexican cartels. There’s a bigger reason for it, but that’s the beginning of the movie.”
He added, “It’s more of a stand-alone spin-off. It’s not a sequel or a prequel. It really is yet another examination told from this male point of view, rather than from a female point of view. It’s pretty cool.”

TUNNEL 11---World War I horror movie stars Rossif Sutherland, son of Donald Sutherland, as a Canadian soldier assigned to tunnel into a German bunker and destroy the biological weapon inside.

GHOSTBUSTERS---Ivan Reitman commented on the franchise after the disappointing all-female remake, “There’s going to be many other Ghostbusters movies, they’re just in development right now.”

JAMES BOND---Roger Moore said he's receptive to an appearance in the franchise he starred in from 1973 to 1985, in order to, "expand the family coffers."

HEAVEN'S GATE---Isabelle Huppert commented on director Michael Cimino and his 1980 movie, “I loved him, of course. He was extraordinary, probably one of the greatest living American filmmakers… Basically he never really, deep inside, he never really got over it. But it was completely inspired. I went there for two months, and then we ended up being there, in Montana, for seven months.”
She also commented on Cimino's remastered version of the movie, “It was a bit weird for me, I have to say, because the colors were very different. You know, the colors of the original film were very [muted]. It was Vilmos Zsigmond, the great cameraman who passed away too, recently. And Michael and Vilmos didn’t get along so well. After the movie, Michael always thought that it was not the color he wanted. It was a bit sepia-like. And then Michael was very happy with the new [version].
When I first saw it, the green was so green, and the red was so red. It was very, very different from what I saw in the first place. But he was happy that he did it. I think he was happy, because also he was completely immersed in the film again by doing this, because it took him many weeks to do that version.”

 
 Posted:   Nov 28, 2016 - 11:47 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

STAR TREK IV: THE VOYAGE HOME---writer Steve Meerson said Eddie Murphy was supposed to play a Berkeley astrophysicist in the sequel, “It was always the same story that approved, but the original draft included a part for Eddie Murphy. Eddie was on the lot at Paramount at the time and arguably was the biggest star in the word. They had told us he was a huge Star Trek fan.”
Meerson said that after the deal fell through, Murphy was replaced by Catherine Hicks and the character was changed,


Thankfully some things don't work out.


GHOSTBUSTERS---Ivan Reitman commented on the franchise after the disappointing all-female remake, “There’s going to be many other Ghostbusters movies, they’re just in development right now.”


The novelty is dead. Let it be. But they won't.

 
 Posted:   Nov 28, 2016 - 7:02 PM   
 By:   Justin Boggan   (Member)

"Star Trek IV: The One With the Whales" was bad enough as it was. It certainly didn't need Murphy to ruin it any further.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 29, 2016 - 12:33 AM   
 By:   Disco Stu   (Member)

"Star Trek IV: The One With the Whales" was bad enough as it was. It certainly didn't need Murphy to ruin it any further.

ST IV is the best of the original cast pictures. The score is great too. After almost 30 years I still absolutely love "Ballad of the whale".

D.S.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 29, 2016 - 12:45 AM   
 By:   jenkwombat   (Member)

ST IV is the best of the original cast pictures.

Agreed.

 
 Posted:   Nov 29, 2016 - 2:31 AM   
 By:   Justin Boggan   (Member)

It's got some good jokes and an excellent score, but the film is whale poop. The more and mroe I think about the film, the more and more dreadful it is. Some of the moments for the crew, are down right embarrasing.

 
 Posted:   Nov 29, 2016 - 7:45 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

It's got some good jokes and an excellent score, but the film is whale poop. The more and mroe I think about the film, the more and more dreadful it is. Some of the moments for the crew, are down right embarrasing.

To each their own. I saw "Voyage Home" about a year ago. Thoroughly enjoyed it from beginning to end. Can't say that about too many films I've seen in the last decade and a half.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 29, 2016 - 9:06 AM   
 By:   Thgil   (Member)

I'm actually right in the middle of showing the Original Series films to my sister. The Voyage Home is next... I have no clue how she's going to react. She really liked The Motion Picture and Wrath of Khan, but was mildly disappointed by The Search for Spock. I guess we'll find out...

 
 Posted:   Nov 29, 2016 - 11:52 AM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

It's got some good jokes and an excellent score, but the film is whale poop. The more and mroe I think about the film, the more and more dreadful it is. Some of the moments for the crew, are down right embarrasing.

ST IV was fine for one viewing, but that was it. ST II is the best of the original cast movies. They should have stuck with doing sequels to original series episodes.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 29, 2016 - 1:07 PM   
 By:   Disco Stu   (Member)

ST IV was fine for one viewing] but that was it. ST II is the best of the original cast movies. They should have stuck with doing sequels to original series episodes.

That's one of the thing I like about IV, they were on contemporary Earth, there were comical interludes. This film was the closest experience to the original series.

D.S.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 29, 2016 - 1:13 PM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

The Voyage Home has aged far better than The Wrath of Khan.
That Meerson Krikes version was wisely ditched, they had little to do with the final product. The actual final movie was a script by Meyer and Bennett. Meerson and Krikes got their names back on the credit through WGA forcing it.

Reitman is doing the usual Hollywood stuff when movie bombs, pretend it was not a bomb.
There is not going to be any more Ghostbuster movies.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 29, 2016 - 2:31 PM   
 By:   ScottyM   (Member)

Star Trek IV was my least favorite of the original series films. Star Trek's full out comedies never appealed to me. Trek worked best when humor was an accent, not the focus. The humor in Khan and Search was very well done. They were very much like the original series in spirit. TVH made the series too jokey going forward. Trek 5 was ruined by an over-reliance on humor. Even the darker ST6 was spoiled by very bad jokes and off character humor.

And the Leonard Rosenmann score was dire. In my fantasy life, James Horner was brought back one more time and gave us a "Cocoon" style score.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 30, 2016 - 2:58 AM   
 By:   jenkwombat   (Member)

So, Nicholas_DW, how did your sister react to 'STAR TREK IV'?

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 30, 2016 - 7:59 AM   
 By:   Joe E.   (Member)

The Voyage Home has aged far better than The Wrath of Khan.
That Meerson Krikes version was wisely ditched, they had little to do with the final product. The actual final movie was a script by Meyer and Bennett. Meerson and Krikes got their names back on the credit through WGA forcing it.

Reitman is doing the usual Hollywood stuff when movie bombs, pretend it was not a bomb.
There is not going to be any more Ghostbuster movies.


I love Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home, but I can't agree about it aging better than Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. And whether this year's movie underperformed or not, Ghostbusters remains one of the top movie properties in Sony's catalog. Maybe this year's reboot won't have a sequel, but I find it frankly unlikely there'll never be any more Ghostbusters movies ever.

 
 Posted:   Nov 30, 2016 - 8:19 AM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)


I love Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home, but I can't agree about it aging better than Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan.


And I agree. Star Trek IV hasn't aged as well as ST II because it's set in the '80s, now thirty years in the past, and it plays like an '80s movie -- and not one of the better ones -- in other words, it now displays too many cornball elements.

ST II is far from a perfect movie and suffers from its limited budget and scope, but it still holds up amazingly well, whereas there's there's too much in ST IV that makes the eyes roll.

I also think ST: TMP is a better movie and has aged better than ST IV.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 30, 2016 - 9:21 AM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)


I love Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home, but I can't agree about it aging better than Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan.


And I agree. Star Trek IV hasn't aged as well as ST II because it's set in the '80s, now thirty years in the past, and it plays like an '80s movie -- and not one of the better ones -- in other words, it now displays too many cornball elements.

ST II is far from a perfect movie and suffers from its limited budget and scope, but it still holds up amazingly well, whereas there's there's too much in ST IV that makes the eyes roll.

I also think ST: TMP is a better movie and has aged better than ST IV.



If I had Star Trek TMP, TWOK and Voyage Home in front of me and I was going to watch two movies, it would be TMP and Voyage Home. TWOK, as good as it is, has a creaky wooden stagey melodrama quality, I still like much of it, but TWOK has had it's reputation unjustly inflated against the other original movies over the past 30 years.

 
 Posted:   Nov 30, 2016 - 11:13 AM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

Wooden, stagey melodrama is basically TOS, which is why TWOK remains the fan favorite of the original cast films. But to each his own.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 30, 2016 - 12:30 PM   
 By:   Joe E.   (Member)

There's more to the movie than either of you is allowing.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 30, 2016 - 1:30 PM   
 By:   ScottyM   (Member)

I just don't understand why the blurb about TVH is even "news." Nothing there is new info. The Eddie Murphy involvement has been public knowledge for decades. Why was that dredged up now? I actually thought this would be about the next Trek film.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 30, 2016 - 1:37 PM   
 By:   Mike_J   (Member)

I just don't understand why the blurb about TVH is even "news." Nothing there is new info. The Eddie Murphy involvement has been public knowledge for decades. Why was that dredged up now? I actually thought this would be about the next Trek film.

Not only has it been public knowledge for years, it was actually pretty well known before the camera had even turned on the movie. I'm pretty sure Starlog reported it when Trek IV was in pre production. I was quite active in U.K. Trek fandom back in those days and everyone knew the rumour that Murphy was potentially going to have a role, although many believed it would just be a cameo.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.