 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have the Kritzerland (one of the few physical soundtracks I've bought in recent years), so I don't need this, but CONGRATS on the new label, Notefornote! Looking forward to whatever you'll issue, especially if it's of the more contemporary kind.
Thor, you are aware that the label is called NOTEFORNOTE? That's another wording for COMPLETEANDCHRONOLOGICAL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everytime I see the name I keep reading an omen-esque Latin chant "NO-TE-FORNO-TE"
I love it!
MV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm still trying to figure out what is supposedly wrong with the cover. Lol. 
I guess that the two leads (Sarandon & Davis) are on the same line as Scott.
The actual art work world wide has the two leads placed higher in art work & Scott central & directly above the title.
But if art was signed off by the Rights holder than it makes little difference unless any of the three concerned raise an issue.
That's my guess
andy b
FYI, The cover was approved by MGM who were rather specific about the placement of the credits of the two leads and the director.
Ford A. Thaxton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posted: |
Jan 26, 2017 - 8:31 AM
|
|
|
|
By: |
andy b
(Member)
|
I'm still trying to figure out what is supposedly wrong with the cover. Lol.
I guess that the two leads (Sarandon & Davis) are on the same line as Scott.
The actual art work world wide has the two leads placed higher in art work & Scott central & directly above the title.
But if art was signed off by the Rights holder than it makes little difference unless any of the three concerned raise an issue.
That's my guess
andy b
FYI, The cover was approved by MGM who were rather specific about the placement of the credits of the two leads and the director.
Ford A. Thaxton
Ford having worked for MGM for a number of years that is why I wrote "if it's signed off by the RIGHTS holder it makes no difference".
I have spent many hours working in contractual placement for every major & minor studio out of Europe to know that.
FYI ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,by the way
Andy b
|
|
|
|
|
|
The only disappointing thing about the Kritzerland version were the short liner notes.
Let's hope Notefornote does a better job with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The only disappointing thing about the Kritzerland version were the short liner notes.
Let's hope Notefornote does a better job with that.
Well, it's all about those liner notes, isn't it? Funny that for decades there were no such things as liner notes, save for maybe a few paragraphs on the back of the LP, and we all got along just fine and dandy. I barely have time to listen to all these CDs, let alone read an eighteen page booklet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The only disappointing thing about the Kritzerland version were the short liner notes.
Let's hope Notefornote does a better job with that.
Well, it's all about those liner notes, isn't it? Funny that for decades there were no such things as liner notes, save for maybe a few paragraphs on the back of the LP, and we all got along just fine and dandy. I barely have time to listen to all these CDs, let alone read an eighteen page booklet.
...and like clockwork.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The only disappointing thing about the Kritzerland version were the short liner notes.
Let's hope Notefornote does a better job with that.
Well, it's all about those liner notes, isn't it? Funny that for decades there were no such things as liner notes, save for maybe a few paragraphs on the back of the LP, and we all got along just fine and dandy. I barely have time to listen to all these CDs, let alone read an eighteen page booklet.
...and like clockwork.
What part is like clockwork?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
