Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Mar 21, 2017 - 8:02 AM   
 By:   Chickenhearted   (Member)

 
 Posted:   Mar 21, 2017 - 8:06 AM   
 By:   mgh   (Member)

Well, I got here first, but can't think of a good clue and that's bad. But that's not news to you guys.

 
 Posted:   Mar 21, 2017 - 8:34 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

No, its not news, but we can bear with you, mgh, until you come up with a badder clue than that. smile
for sure it isn't Ryan's daughter. Although she pitched up for the role.

 
 Posted:   Mar 21, 2017 - 9:26 AM   
 By:   mgh   (Member)

No, its not news, but we can bear with you, mgh, until you come up with a badder clue than that. smile
for sure it isn't Ryan's daughter. Although she pitched up for the role.


Wow, I didn't know Walter Matthau was in Ryan's Daughter.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 21, 2017 - 12:09 PM   
 By:   Doc Loch   (Member)

Ursa Minor League

 
 Posted:   Mar 21, 2017 - 9:07 PM   
 By:   Sir David of Garland   (Member)

She got paid a pant-load of money to do this movie, since she just won an Oscar.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 21, 2017 - 9:15 PM   
 By:   Christopher Kinsinger   (Member)

Awwww, come on guys!
The TITLE of this flick is right there in the poster photo!

BEARS!!!

The movie is called BEARS!!!

That's my story, and I'm stickin' to it.
Anyone who says different is just tryin' to bring me bad news.

 
 Posted:   Mar 21, 2017 - 9:31 PM   
 By:   Sir David of Garland   (Member)


Anyone who says different is just tryin' to bring me bad news.


 
 
 Posted:   Mar 21, 2017 - 9:57 PM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

She got paid a pant-load of money to do this movie, since she just won an Oscar.


She got $350,000 and eight percent of net profits.

Matthau’s contract entitled him to 15 percent of gross receipts over $13 million. In theaters, the film grossed $42,349,782. That means that Matthau's cut was $1,943,648.

But Matthau was also entitled to his cut of the gross receipts of the film's sale to television. In 1979, Paramount packaged the film together with its two sequels for sale to television for $18.5 million. That provoked a lawsuit from Matthau, who believed that the group sale of his film, along with its less-well-performing sequels, reduced the value that his film might have received on its own -- thus lowering Matthau's income. Reportedly, in 1981, a satisfactory settlement was reached out of court.

 
 Posted:   Mar 22, 2017 - 6:42 AM   
 By:   jackfu   (Member)

Do they, uhm, uh,...you know, on the ball field?

 
 Posted:   Mar 22, 2017 - 5:05 PM   
 By:   Sir David of Garland   (Member)

She got paid a pant-load of money to do this movie, since she just won an Oscar.

I recall the movie being a bit of a disappointment considering how vaunted she was, generally.

Was I maybe expecting another BILL OF DIVORCEMENT or GONE WITH THE WIND? Maybe.

 
 Posted:   Apr 7, 2017 - 7:26 PM   
 By:   Chickenhearted   (Member)

Well, I got here first, but can't think of a good clue and that's bad. But that's not news to you guys.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.