|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bloodthirsty tidings, makes me ashamed to be American. What he did was nearly fifty years ago and horrible. But that's what he did fifty years ago. What has he done since, forgetting the Bugliosi paranoia? He certainly hasn't hurt anyone here or their families. I don't look down upon the bloodthirsty here in this country, I feel sorry for them. Because that kind of lust never ends, and is a toxic and loathsome vice. He did bad things a long time ago, and he died of natural causes, without hurting me or any of you above. Is it such a great thing for you? I doubt the majority of people are impressed with this.
|
|
|
|
|
I hope he becomes Hitler's butt buddy in Hell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If he'd been given the death penalty back then, I wonder if his "legend" would have built up over time and become more influential. It was certainly worth a shot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If he'd been given the death penalty back then, I wonder if his "legend" would have built up over time and become more influential. First it was the "Sharon Tate murders," then the "Tate-LaBianca murders," now the "Manson Family murders." He, and the media fascination with him, succeeded in sublimating the victims and elevating himself. So why are we talking about him now? Is it media fascination or lynch mob fascination? It gives people a chance to show how bloodthirsty they are, and is a predominantly American lust. If someone is truly praising god in regard to someone's death they look pretty bad, religious or not. It's as if the person doesn't have much good in their lives to begin with. He lived, he died. He had no impact on mine or I'd guess practically anyone else's life or family in direct terms. Why care at all. But hey, no judgements. And that's my main point. We all have to die, regardless of deed or creed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is a predominantly American lust. Facts and figures please, or if not a citation or two. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|