|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: |
May 18, 2018 - 9:28 AM
|
|
|
By: |
Solium
(Member)
|
Yes, because ALIENS, AVATAR and TITANIC are such "lacking" scores. What missed opportunities! I don't care for Aliens other than a few cues near the end. As I already discussed Avatar and Titanic are very "sterile" and lack the emotional punch of his orchestral scores. Avatar and Titanic are well constructed but really just serviceable. Most importantly he could've written much better scores for those films. They could easily be replaced. And it's just not the Horner collaboration, I can't think of a score in a Cameron film that I really like much less love. Horner's efforts are the best, but then again it's Horner. We'd surely have a heated discussion if we ever met in real life, since AVATAR is my number 2 Horner and ALIENS my number 3 (both after BOY IN THE STRIPED PYJAMAS). TITANIC probably features in, or close to, the Top 10 as well. Avatar and Titanic are very good "new age" scores. They've grown on me a lot over the years, but they just don't resonate with me like Glory; American Tail; Land Before Time; ST:2; Rocketeer; Zorro, etc. Same is true of Goldsmith's work, I much prefer his orchestral works over his electronic ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cameron only directs films beginning with T or A so JP wouldn't fit in with his filmography. Yes, Cameron is all about the T&A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|