Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Jan 31, 2008 - 4:25 PM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

So what the hell happened? wink

Here was a guy who had the rugged looks, comic ability & timing, and even producer's clout, yet his career never quite "took off" in the leading man sense like, say, George Clooney's (already an Oscar winner) has. Selleck is likable, for sure, and in his defense he *has* worked on many TV movies (including the "Jesse Stone" films), commercials, done voiceovers and has maintained his career in that he's working, but for someone who was once hailed (IIRC) as the "next Clark Gable", Selleck's post-MAGNUM, P.I. career isn't what I thought it would be.

Your thoughts?

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 31, 2008 - 4:30 PM   
 By:   Michael24   (Member)

I've always wondered as well. I mean, he seemed right on the edge of really breaking out, but I guess maybe too many producers just didn't see him as anything other than Magnum? Which is a shame. As much as I love that character, Selleck has proven to be a actor who could easily play a variety of roles.

Still, as you said, he's worked steadily ever since and he always seems passionate about the projects he's involved with, so he's probably happy with the way things are. smile

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 31, 2008 - 5:03 PM   
 By:   Montana Dave   (Member)

I turned my back on fame and moved to Montana. wink I have been told, over the years, that there is a 'resemblence'.

 
 Posted:   Jan 31, 2008 - 5:26 PM   
 By:   SheriffJoe   (Member)

He chose some very...interesting roles for his film work. Three Men and a Baby...Runaway...

Some VERY INTERESTING roles....

But nothing as iconic as Thomas Magnum...

 
 Posted:   Jan 31, 2008 - 5:36 PM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

So what the hell happened? wink

Here was a guy who had the rugged looks, comic ability & timing, and even producer's clout, yet his career never quite "took off" in the leading man sense like, say, George Clooney's (already an Oscar winner) has. Selleck is likable, for sure, and in his defense he *has* worked on many TV movies (including the "Jesse Stone" films), commercials, done voiceovers and has maintained his career in that he's working, but for someone who was once hailed (IIRC) as the "next Clark Gable", Selleck's post-MAGNUM, P.I. career isn't what I thought it would be.

Your thoughts?


well, he WAS cast as Indiana Jones...

btw anyone agree with me about mustaches detracting from a man's looks?

Selleck, Burt reynolds, Clark Gable, Connery
all look much more handsome clean shaven imho

beards are ok though!

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 31, 2008 - 5:42 PM   
 By:   Michael24   (Member)

I don't know. When Selleck went mustacheless for IN & OUT, it just looked totally wrong. Some actors don't look good with mustaches, while others do, and I think Selleck is one of them.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 31, 2008 - 5:45 PM   
 By:   manderley   (Member)

Tom Selleck has always reminded me of Sam Elliot, not only in looks and demeanor, but career.

Both have been successful in their ways, now turning to character roles a lot of the time.

But don't you think, overall, that they are in some ways, throw-backs to the matinee-idol old-star system that pretty well no longer existed by the time they had made it to the top?

 
 Posted:   Jan 31, 2008 - 6:00 PM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

Tom Selleck has always reminded me of Sam Elliot, not only in looks and demeanor, but career.

Both have been successful in their ways, now turning to character roles a lot of the time.

But don't you think, overall, that they are in some ways, throw-backs to the matinee-idol old-star system that pretty well no longer existed by the time they had made it to the top?


so Manderley, what about the rumours about Selleck?
true or false?

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 31, 2008 - 6:32 PM   
 By:   quiller007   (Member)


btw anyone agree with me about mustaches detracting from a man's looks?

Selleck, Burt reynolds, Clark Gable, Connery
all look much more handsome clean shaven imho
beards are ok though!


Totally DISAGREE. Mustaches are fine,
as long as they are kept trim and clean.
Beards are NOT. The stubble look is
o.k., too. Clean shaven...great.
Beards are disgusting, imo.

Den

 
 Posted:   Jan 31, 2008 - 6:38 PM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)


btw anyone agree with me about mustaches detracting from a man's looks?

Selleck, Burt reynolds, Clark Gable, Connery
all look much more handsome clean shaven imho
beards are ok though!


Totally DISAGREE. Mustaches are fine,
as long as they are kept trim and clean.
Beards are NOT. The stubble look is
o.k., too. Clean shaven...great.
Beards are disgusting, imo.

Den


hey! my father had a beard!

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 31, 2008 - 8:15 PM   
 By:   dragon53   (Member)

I case you aren't aware of it, Selleck replaced James Caan in the LAS VEGAS tv series.
I posted here some time ago that Selleck thought the movie remake of the MAGNUM, PI tv series was ridiculous and apparently turned down a cameo role in it.

 
 Posted:   Jan 31, 2008 - 8:30 PM   
 By:   MikeJ   (Member)

Tom Selleck has been a welcome addition to LAS VEGAS. Granted, the scripts don't demand too much of the cast but he seems to be having a good time.

I've really enjoyed the various Westerns he's done for TNT like LAST STAND AT SABRE RIVER and CROSSFIRE TRAIL and his current role as Jesse Stone is always a treat. I think he's getting even better as an actor as he ages.

 
 Posted:   Jan 31, 2008 - 10:42 PM   
 By:   Josh   (Member)

I haven't seen it in a LONG time, but I remember liking his performance in AN INNOCENT MAN (1989, the same year that Stallone starred in LOCK UP). Speaking of AN INNOCENT MAN, how come Howard Shore's score has never seen an official CD release?!?

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 1, 2008 - 12:16 AM   
 By:   Michael24   (Member)

I case you aren't aware of it, Selleck replaced James Caan in the LAS VEGAS tv series.
I posted here some time ago that Selleck thought the movie remake of the MAGNUM, PI tv series was ridiculous and apparently turned down a cameo role in it.


The team-up that Selleck wanted to do with Tom Clancy for a MAGNUM movie would have rocked! There's no reason why Selleck can't still play Magnum on the big screen. And besides, it'd be nice to see more movies based on TV shows that are a continuation of the series with the same cast rather than each film adaptation being a "relaunch" (for lack of a better word).

 
 Posted:   Feb 1, 2008 - 5:31 AM   
 By:   Misanthropic Tendencies   (Member)

I don't know how many of these films were post-Magnum (I never really watched Magnum, though like the theme music!) but I liked Selleck in:-

Runaway
High Road to China
Her Alibi
An Innocent Man
Quigley Down Under
Coma
Three Men and a Baby (haven't seen the sequel)

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 1, 2008 - 7:47 AM   
 By:   dragon53   (Member)

GOLDSMITHFAN1978:

I agree, particularly since the plot is timely---Magnum and friends vs. North Koreans acquiring nuclear material in Hong Kong.

 
 Posted:   Feb 1, 2008 - 9:01 AM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

"Popularity is the pocket change of history."

~Tom Selleck

 
 Posted:   Feb 1, 2008 - 9:29 AM   
 By:   Ray Faiola   (Member)

I saw Selleck on Broadway in A THOUSAND CLOWNS. He was certainly less "Murray" than Jason Robards, but he nevertheless pulled it off respectably. The kid, unfortunately, was awful and, if you know the play (and Barry Gordon's original performance), that's a pretty fatal flaw.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 1, 2008 - 9:45 AM   
 By:   Gordon Reeves   (Member)

Our choice for the film which best showcased Selleck’s style most impressively is Simon Wincer’s woefully underrated



Expertly guided by Wincer (whose previous Olympian achievement was LONESOME DOVE) (and conclusively supported by Basil Poledouris’ unbeatable score), QUIGLEY



Spotlighted Selleck’s understated but no less strong charisma, wry humor and subtle manliness (that would-be macho muscleheads ala Steroid Stallone and others of his misformed ilk have no conclusive clue about then, now or ever)

















in a manner nothing else (to our fractured, enfeebled, thoroughly warped POV) has since he achieved his apex on teevee with Thomas of Magnum

And, less we disagree with such a venerated Oracle as Sir M’s query

But don't you think, overall, that they are in some ways, throw-backs to the matinee-idol old-star system that pretty well no longer existed by the time they had made it to the top?



we rather respectfully suggest the standards he’s alluded to didn’t so much no longer exist as had definitely CHANGED (almost mirroring the studio system itself, n’est ce pas?) wink

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 1, 2008 - 11:14 AM   
 By:   John B. Archibald   (Member)

I always thought the major drawback with Selleck as a film actor was his voice. The looks are there, rugged, masculine. It's no accident he used to pose for cigarette ads. (I can remember seeing a hologram of him smoking a Salem cigarette, set up in the middle of Grand Central Station, where it stayed for some months.)

But his voice has never matched his image. His voice makes him sound like a wuss, imo. It doesn't have the gravelly raspiness of Mr. Elliott. It sounds like the voice of a performer more adept at comedy, in direct contrast to his appearance.

Actually, he started out as a model. Hence the ads. Look carefully, and you can see him as an extra in a scene with Mae West, in MYRA BRECKENRIDGE.

Great looks, no argument there. But the voice doesn't cut it. Much too reasonable-sounding, guy-next-door.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.