 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What are its characteristics?
1 - Telling me what is happening on the screen. (Hello, people, this stuff belongs on a descriptive audio track for people with vision problems, not for the rest of us who can already see!)
2 - Telling me the same information over and over. (Again, this belongs on an audio track for people with some other disability.)
3 - Repeating lines that are being said, usually with a sense of awe. (Somebody else already said this line and did it better.)
(I came up with these after listening to the commentary on EL CID, which needed editing and the contribution of others.)
Any other characteristics?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I want to hear a commentary when we hear THE TRUTH, when the director is like oh this scene was fun, but Robert DeNiro kept flubbing his lines and it ticked me off, or some other truth, we never hear these things. I think it would be cool, course, it would be the last picture the director would direct, but us, the audience listening would be cracking up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roy Thinnes' intros for "The Invaders": awful, dull and contrived as if he was reading his text on a screen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roy Thinnes' intros for "The Invaders": awful, dull and contrived as if he was reading his text on a screen.
He WAS reading them. What did you expect him to say in the intros? I thought they were adequate (except his Burgess Meredith/Joker gaffe)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
