 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Watched it for the first time this weekend. Good little Crawford vehicle thats looks remarkable on DVD. I found the way the story unfolded to be interesting, particularly because, by the time it was all over, I didn't know how I felt about the Crawford character. I still don't. Maybe I'm supposed to feel ambiguous, and if so, mission accomplished! And though I haven't really given it much thought, I haven't yet determined the relevancy of the title, though I'm starting to get inklings of it maybe.
Curious to know what classic film lovers think about this one. Good cinematography!
The commentary by director Vincent Sherman is uneventful. Not a lot of tidbits, mostly commenting on what's on screen (yawn).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Izzis the one "about the boy on the bicycle"?
I seem to thinking it glamorous but thin, but probably pleasing to the Joanists, since there is a lot of her, plus an extra helping of her for good measure.
The featurette did illuminate the formula for her films of this time, which I thought very interesting.
Steven J is a Joanist, isn't he?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Izzis the one "about the boy on the bicycle"?
I seem to thinking it glamorous but thin, but probably pleasing to the Joanists, since there is a lot of her, plus an extra helping of her for good measure.
The featurette did illuminate the formula for her films of this time, which I thought very interesting.
Steven J is a Joanist, isn't he?
Yes, and I liked this movie. I haven't seen it since AMC ran in in 1997.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I got a print last year. Had never seen it before. Really liked it. The strange thing is, there were several cues among Steiner's acetates. And it definitely sounds Steineresque. I checked the cue sheets and everything is credited to Amfitheatrof. Quite a mystery.
Maybe it's on the acetates because Steiner conducted for Amfitheatrof.
But I can't guess at why it sounds like MS unless DA was asked to write like him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
