|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, the ratio of a movie negative is not always the intended screen ratio, which is why when some (older) movies were released on VHS with "uncropped" images (to fit the TV screen, instead of Pan & Scan or Letterbox releases), people were suddenly noticing and complaining about visible microphones and stuff, which obviously were never intended to be seen. Because the directors (of photography) knew this would not be visible in the intended aspect ratio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I never nabbed the Criterion DVD. Is it anamorphic? Being Criterion, I would hope so, but I've gotten burned in the past with old DVDs. Looking at the specs on DVDBeaver, it does not look like the Criterion is anamorphic, then again, it also says it came out in 1998 so it might have been before they started doing anamorphic transfers (their initial release of Silence of the Lambs was also non-anamorphic). http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film/DVDCompare3/robocop.htm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|