Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2001 - 7:44 AM   
 By:   Jim Cleveland   (Member)

I was watching EWS tonight, and a few questions popped into my head that I just KNEW one of you could answer for me!
First; Who was it that Syndey Pollock replaced? I know that someone else was supposed to play the part originally.
Second, why did Kubrick start using "classical" music for his "scores" instead of commissioning original scores for his films?

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2001 - 8:36 AM   
 By:   ManinDonutShop   (Member)

He replaced Keitel, Jim.

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2001 - 9:40 AM   
 By:   Brian Mellies   (Member)

MGM, apparently with Kubrick's blessing, hired Alex North for 2001. North supplied a score. He didn't know until he attended the London premiere that his score had been dumped. It is said Kubrick never seriously considered using North's score, that he was just trying to go along with the studio brass so they would leave him alone.
It seems he was just too enamored of his temp track to let it go.
Of course, there's always the issue of Kubrick being an obsessive control freak.

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2001 - 9:47 AM   
 By:   Spacehunter   (Member)

Did North write an entire score? Doesn't the rerecording by Goldsmith from a few years back represent everything North had written, less than half of a full score? I thought North was let go from the project, but was under the impression the music he had written was still going to be used.

np ALIENS: DELUXE EDITION

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 29, 2001 - 2:44 AM   
 By:   soundtrakker   (Member)

I have a question regarding the ending of EYES WIDE SHUT. I left the theater baffled as to the meaning of the "mask on the bed". Did the mask belong to the wife? If so, was she a member of the secret orgy club long before her husband showed up? How creepy if she was present to witness his forced unmasking! I always suspected that the Sydney Pollack character was also behind one of those many masks.

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 29, 2001 - 4:22 AM   
 By:   Ringo   (Member)

The liner notes to Norths 2001 explain everything in full. If I had them here with me I'd type them verbatim. But, Kubrick never intended to use an original score. To appease the studio he allowed North to be hired. North wrote music for about the first half of the film (give or take), one day Kubrick told him he wouldn't need any more music, that he would use breathing effects for the final scenes. North thought it odd, but still expected to hear his music at the premiere and (needless to say), did not hear one note of his score. This apparently left him crushed and for years only shared those 2001 session tapes with Goldsmith.

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 29, 2001 - 7:31 AM   
 By:   Wickenstein   (Member)

quote:
Originally posted by soundtrakker:
I have a question regarding the ending of EYES WIDE SHUT. I left the theater baffled as to the meaning of the "mask on the bed". Did the mask belong to the wife? If so, was she a member of the secret orgy club long before her husband showed up? How creepy if she was present to witness his forced unmasking! I always suspected that the Sydney Pollack character was also behind one of those many masks.

That's one of the mysteries of the film! I've never heard that theory before, but the mask definitely was the same one as Tom Cruises, so it wasn't hers. Perhaps she was looking through his things and found it. I've also heard a theory that the mask isn't even really on the bed. It's just Cruise's guilt symbolically manifesting itself on screen. Like all Kubrick films, the real answer is up to orselves to decide.

-

I too am convinced that the masked guy at the club is Pollack, although after watching it last night I wonder if it couldn't be the middle aged foreigner dancing with Kidman at the beginning.

-

There was another character replaced in the movie. Originally the young woman in Dalorise Claiborne (I's sorry, I forget her name) was was going to be the daughter of the dead guy that says she loves Cruise. I always thought that part was written for a younger woman.

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 29, 2001 - 3:16 AM   
 By:   ManinDonutShop   (Member)

Jennifer Jason Leigh, friend.

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 29, 2001 - 3:52 AM   
 By:   Ubik   (Member)

My reaction when I first saw that scene was that the mask belonged to the wife, that she had been a part of the secret society, and this was her way of telling him that she knew everything he had been doing. Of course, within moments we learned that this wasn't the case. That was the only moment in this dreadful and ponderous film where I thought the story was about to take an intriguing twist...The truth is, as is now becoming apparent, Kubrick's unique cinematic voice had nothing left to express after "Full Metal Jacket." The only other ideas he had were bankrupt; he wrestled with them for decades because they were no good and he couldn't make anything of them. Rather than staying retired from films, he went ahead anyway with "Eyes Wide Shut" and gave his other pointless idea, "A.I.," to Spielberg to see what he could make from it. Kubrick's legacy is sadly compromised as a result.

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 30, 2001 - 7:11 AM   
 By:   soundtrakker   (Member)

The ending of EYES WIDE SHUT left me so frustrated with unanswered questions, that I vowed not to view the film again for 10 years. However, after reading the feedback on this thread, I find my eyes wide open for another look.

IMHO, the Kubrick-influenced A.I. is beyond "cutting edge". I predict that this film will capture the awe of future generations; and, if the Japanese response is prophetic, perhaps this generation as well.

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 31, 2001 - 10:48 AM   
 By:   Cooper   (Member)

I thought it was made pretty clear in 'Eyes' that Kidman--Dr. Bill's wife--had found his mask; the very same discovered to be missing when Cruise returned the costume to the rental place. She had assumedly rummaged, found it, kept it, unveiled it to him later as a means of saying "I know," though Kubrick never spells out how much.

I thought it was a metaphor for Cruise's secret self; his hidden id/libido which took affront at his wife's candid confession of longing for another man earlier in the film. It actually works as a representation of the level of deceipt present--the film suggests--in any relationship; a layer of concealment. In "Eyes," Kidman's wanderlust took place in dreams. For Cruise, it was unleashed in an equally dreamy night out on the town.

The title "Eyes Wide Shut" seems to refer to the solution Kidman and Cruise arrive at at the conclusion of the film; each has become aware of the other's formerly hidden side...and must now, warily, move on with their intimacy. A little less naive, a little wiser about their natures and capacities...they resume their relationship. They see each other more clearly--their eyes "Wide"--though they also choose to look the other way, for the sake of their marriage (their eyes also, willfully "Shut").


As for why Kubrick goes with classical--though Eyes Wide Shut (some terrific Jocelyn Pook in there), Full Metal Jacket and The Shining all use some original material--I think he thought it lent a more mythic, timeless and larger than life quality to his films. I definitely feel that his films--especially 2001--would feel more dated were it not for his choice in music. Whatever reason "the classics" seem to have the shelf life they do, they only serve to give Kubrick's movies the same, ageless staying power. The North Stuff for A Space Odyssey? Doesn't that feel, like, so 33 years ago? But cue up Kubrick's version on that remastered dvd and it's fresh as it ever was, at least in my view.


[This message has been edited by Cooper (edited 31 July 2001).]

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 6, 2001 - 11:55 PM   
 By:   soundtrakker   (Member)

I have just viewed EYES WIDE SHUT for the 2nd time, and offer some new theories.

What we know:
Tom Cruise crashes the secret orgy club with the help of the blindfolded piano player, and arouses suspicion by arriving in a taxi instead of a limo. A search of his checked coat reveals the receipt for his costume rental, with his name on it. He is summoned before the Master of Ceremonies and forced to unmask. His cover blown, he is warned that he faces "dire consequences". A naked woman shouts from the balcony that she is willing to "sacrifice" herself so that Cruise might be spared. We later learn that this was the same woman that Cruise saved from a drug overdose at Sydney Pollock's party. She later turns up dead in her apartment, and Cruise views her body at the morgue. He also learns that his piano player friend has apparently been forced to fly back home to California. When Cruise returns the rented costume, he discovers that the mask is missing, which later turns up on his pillow next to his sleeping wife, Nicole Kidman.

Questions raised:
When Cruise crashes the masked orgy, he witnesses a strange ritual with even stranger music. The music/chant echoes depravity and unspeakable evil. When the naked woman on the balcony offers to sacrifice herself for Cruise, what was her fate? What happened to her before she turned up dead? Again, this was the woman Cruise had previously saved from a drug overdose (and possible suicide attempt). Was her life hell? Was she ready to die even before she had the opportunity to save Cruise?

My theory:
The naked woman on the balcony recognized Cruise, and wanting to protect the man who had been kind to her, announced that she would accept the club's punishment for Cruise's deception. We were never told what her punishment was, so here's my theory. Her punishment and fate was to be the victim in a "snuff" movie, with none other than the piano player as her forced lover/murderer. Perverted club + suicidal woman = snuff movie. And certainly the piano player, whose deception was also uncovered, would be forced into silence by his filmed participation.

And what of the lost mask? My theory is that Nicole Kidman was a member of the secret orgy club long before her husband Tom Cruise showed up, and was present to witness his unmasking. She found the mask at the orgy or later at home, and placed it on her husband's pillow as a means to confess her membership in the orgy club, and her unfulfillment with him sexually. Her last words to him are an optomistic, "Let's fuck".

http://members.aol.com/movposter/eyesw.jpg">
[This message has been edited by soundtrakker (edited 10 August 2001).]

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 8, 2001 - 3:00 AM   
 By:   Cooper   (Member)


I think Pollack was lying to Cruise; the self sacrificing woman at the party--the orgy ceremony--was, I think, Domino--or whatever her name was--the hooker Cruise entertained a night with before his wife called. It was this girl that was on the slab in the morgue, not the girl from the party that Cruise helped revive. So, my understanding was that Pollack had subtly tried to mislead Cruise, thus exonerating the orgy gang from any involvement in the death of Domino, the woman who surrendered herself for Tom. I think Kubrick layered in some conflicting detail here to create a queasy feeling of uncertainty, much like that evoked from Kidman's dreams.


[This message has been edited by Cooper (edited 08 August 2001).]

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 8, 2001 - 7:38 AM   
 By:   General Thade   (Member)

The movie is a dream so none of it makes sense really...

why would they kill someone and let cruise go?

why wouldnt cruise go to the cops?

this could have been a provactive movie exploring the sexual underground as it exits instead it is all 1 big dream that doesnt make sense in a "real world sense" i.e. the sacrifice ONLY mkaes sense in a dream/symbolic way

it is highly watchable as an exciting dream but deviod of plot and realism it leaves you with the empty post-dream feeling

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 10, 2001 - 6:55 AM   
 By:   Cooper   (Member)

Thematically, Eyes Wide Shut makes big-time sense, as the somewhat naive characters explore the chilly fringes of their own, innate capacity for wanderlust...which, once discovered, pose some hefty new challenges for them to overcome in their shared relationship. So, while some of these events are dreamlike and surreal, they're all grounded--I feel--in a coherent body of themes.

[This message has been edited by Cooper (edited 10 August 2001).]

 
 Posted:   Aug 10, 2001 - 2:01 AM   
 By:   dogplant   (Member)

quote:
Originally posted by Ubik:
My reaction when I first saw that scene was that the mask belonged to the wife, that she had been a part of the secret society, and this was her way of telling him that she knew everything he had been doing. Of course, within moments we learned that this wasn't the case. That was the only moment in this dreadful and ponderous film where I thought the story was about to take an intriguing twist...The truth is, as is now becoming apparent, Kubrick's unique cinematic voice had nothing left to express after "Full Metal Jacket." The only other ideas he had were bankrupt; he wrestled with them for decades because they were no good and he couldn't make anything of them. Rather than staying retired from films, he went ahead anyway with "Eyes Wide Shut" and gave his other pointless idea, "A.I.," to Spielberg to see what he could make from it. Kubrick's legacy is sadly compromised as a result.

I find nothing sad or bankrupt about Kubrick's legacy; and I am amazed that the mask on the pillow in "Eyes Wide Shut" is generating this debate.

To me, it was obvious that the mask had been left on Dr. Bill's pillow by the faceless people who had been engineering the orgy as a warning: just when Dr. Bill thinks he has escaped the evening's ordeal, he realizes these faceless people still have the power to bring his relationship with his wife crashing down with this final parting gift. Dreadful and ponderous were not adjectives that sprang to mind.

Years later, to this viewer, after all the hoopla and anticipation of Kubrick's final film have faded into memory, "Eyes Wide Shut" stands as a chilling and subversive exclamation point at the end of Kubrick's brilliant career -- particularly with the movie's hilarious parting line of dialogue.

I'm looking forward to the hindsight that future years will bring to Spielberg and Kubrick's "A.I." Kubrick never retired because film was his life's blood. I'd dare say the same will apply to Spielberg.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 10, 2001 - 2:33 AM   
 By:   Originalthinkr@aol.com   (Member)

The presence of a mask on the bed in EYES WIDE SHUT was a symbolic reference to the fact that Nicole Kidman's character was carrying on simultaneous extra-marital affairs with Jim Carrey and Antonio Banderas.

Oh, and Wickenstein: it's spelled DOLORES Claiborne.

 
 Posted:   Aug 11, 2001 - 4:38 AM   
 By:   Josh "Swashbuckler" Gizelt   (Member)

It's interesting that everyone seems so hung up about the sexuality on display in the film; while certainly it is the conflicting views of it that is the generator of the film's events, one always comes across the fact that the main divider in Eyes Wide Shut is not gender identification, but money.

Sydney Pollack's character was, of course, at the Masked Ball; Nicole Kidman, however, is a representative of the "trophy wife" concept. That is why she is established early on in the film in the "daily routine" sequence.

While certainly Tom Cruise's character is of the upper class, the people that he finds himself dealing with at the Masked Ball make him look homeless. His presence at Pollack's party was exactly what it ended up being... to be on hand in case things should get out of hand.

The Masked Ball itself represents an enigmatic aspect of power, one so ubiquitous that it can not even be defined. Sexuality is tied into power in the male mindset (rape is a crime of power, not sexuality, despite the nature of the act), and one sees at the Masked Ball a hyperpatriarchal situation.

When Sydney Pollack offers alternate theories regarding what happened to the "victims" Tom Cruise searches for, the message is not that he is attempting to decieve Cruise (chances are he doesn't expect Cruise to believe him any more than we do), but rather to express the fact that an event can be distorted provided one has the means to do it... and that reality itself is so based on our subjective perception that to pinpoint an "event" can often be as pointless as the empty sex seen at the Masked Ball.

No, I don't think Nicole Kidman had anything to do with the Masked Ball. I think rather that she found the mask and leaving it on the bed was a question and a challenge, one which Cruise is ill-prepared to deal with.

To those who consider Eyes Wide Shut Kubrick's failure, I would ask that they return to the film and, instead of looking for insights on sexuality (the film pretty much gets all that out of the way in the first place), look instead from the point of view of class perspective and personal perception (I live in New York and while I have never seen a street that looks like the ones seen in the film, I must admit that there is an element to them that seems oddly familiar). Yes, much of Eyes Wide Shut has a dreamlike quality to it, but the story does follow its internal logic if one looks at it for what it is, rather than what they expected it to be.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 27, 2001 - 3:30 AM   
 By:   soundtrakker   (Member)

I have added EYES WIDE SHUT to my video library, and have just viewed it for the third time. I have discovered that this thread contains the following major errors, some my own:

1. The girl Cruise saves from a drug overdose at the party, and the masked girl who saves Cruise at the orgy, and the dead girl Cruise views at the morgue are all the same person, Amanda (Mandy) Curran.

2. The blindfolded piano player is forced to fly home to Seattle, not California.

3. The newspaper headline reads, EX-BEAUTY QUEEN IN HOTEL DRUG OVERDOSE. We learn that Mandy was found alone and unconscious in her apartment, with her door locked from inside, and that she later died at the hospital. This would seem to snuff out my snuff movie theory. Yet I still suspect that something other than drugs was a factor in her death, something only that bizarre club could conceive, like electric shock torture or something.

This long, strange movie raises sooooooo many questions, and the clues in the dialogue come non-stop, but exasperatingly slow, with long pauses.

New theories will probably pop into my head, but I still believe Kidman was at the masked orgy. The video begins with a plug for http://www.kubrickfilms.com" TARGET=_blank>www.kubrickfilms.com which may offer new insights into this enigma of a movie.

http://www.animationstation.net/posterimages/E/Eyes_Wide_Shut.jpg">

 
 Posted:   Oct 16, 2014 - 11:27 AM   
 By:   Sir David of Garland   (Member)

I have avoided reading all of this thread because it looks like it contains spoilers.

My question is: Is it worth going to in a theater? It's playing in Berkeley on Halloween.

I've seen most of Kubrick's most accessible films, I think (2001, most of the stuff before and including STRANGELOVE, SHINING), but I wonder if he gets elliptical in this film in a way that would make me snooze.

I'm a big fan of traditional narrative and only sometimes enjoy other sorts of storytelling (IMAGES, etc.)

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.