Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Feb 27, 2012 - 11:29 AM   
 By:   Gunnar   (Member)

Mike, thank you so much! You really never fail me with your insight into composition and orchestration. This is exactly what I meant, and Vaughan Williams and Hovhaness are exactly the composers where I have heard this sound before.

Do you, by any chance, have also an idea why all the higher registers of the strings should be on the right side in WAR HORSE?

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 27, 2012 - 11:54 AM   
 By:   Mike West   (Member)

Mike, thank you so much! You really never fail me with your insight into composition and orchestration. This is exactly what I meant, and Vaughan Williams and Hovhaness are exactly the composers where I have heard this sound before.

Do you, by any chance, have also an idea why all the higher registers of the strings should be on the right side in WAR HORSE?


thanks smile
it is really interesting that Willams channeled that british pastoral idiom so much, also using a lot of what could be called modal harmonies and shifting them completely with the melody.

Also the spacing of the chord in the strings is essential for that sound, there is some space between the notes of the chords which gives that open sound.

But no idea why the higher registers are on the right - I did not notice that so far.
Could be a mistake in recording engineering?
There are some alternatives in positioning the groups in the strings, but the first Violins are on the left side normally, actually in every possible arrangment of strings.
I'll listen to that again the next days and try to figure out.
Shame on me I did not notice, maybe my dolby surround system did mix it in other ways.
Did not notice it in the cinema either.
Just that the string sound sounds somewhat muffled sometimes, lacking some sonority and brightness.

 
 Posted:   Feb 27, 2012 - 12:48 PM   
 By:   Gunnar   (Member)

it is really interesting that Willams channeled that british pastoral idiom so much, also using a lot of what could be called modal harmonies and shifting them completely with the melody.

That's one of the things I like about this score - it's unmistakeably Williams, but it is also unmistakeably WAR HORSE. The score as a whole has a unique voice that sets it apart from others of his scores. Yes, there are similarities to JANE EYRE and FAR AND AWAY, but still, it's very much a one-of-a-kind score.

There was a time, I think in the early 2000's, when Williams was very productive, but at times in the action music it became a bit hard to tell from which film it actually was. Not this time - there's really nothing I had noticed that had seeped over from TINTIN, for example. Although, admittedly, there were probably many months between the composition of the two scores.

I also noticed a certain structure in the writing that I think Williams hasn't employed that often, where a melody line is played in one section, and is repeated with perhaps one or two bars delay by a different section. So it's sort of a canon-like counterpoint that goes on only for a few bars. Is this perhaps something specific to English music as well?

What I liked, as sort of a cheeky self-reference, was the end of "Horse vs. Car", where the music goes into full, trademark Williams "taking flight" mode, only to be stopped short by the horse refusing to jump.

Finally, my impression is that "The Homecoming" is sort of a love letter of Williams to English music. Although it's, IIRC, the End Credits suite, he completely eschews the action material (which, in a normal end credits suite would take a central role) and focuses instead on the more romantic, pastoral material. Or perhaps it's his way of saying "Thank Goodness the war is over, now let's be happy that we're back in Devon again."

But no idea why the higher registers are on the right - I did not notice that so far.
Could be a mistake in recording engineering?
There are some alternatives in positioning the groups in the strings, but the first Violins are on the left side normally, actually in every possible arrangment of strings.


I also looked up some orchestra seating positions and couldn't find anything that matched what I think I hear. If this wasn't the product of the best people in the industry, I would venture the thought that the first violins simply weren't recorded - which would also account for the muffled sound, as the strings become quite sonically unbalanced if you leave out the first violins. But as this clearly cannot be the case, I'll have to continue to scratch my head...

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 27, 2012 - 1:13 PM   
 By:   Mike West   (Member)

Yes, I like War Horse also very much for the scores singular appearance and feel quite the same about it.



I also looked up some orchestra seating positions and couldn't find anything that matched what I think I hear. If this wasn't the product of the best people in the industry, I would venture the thought that the first violins simply weren't recorded - which would also account for the muffled sound, as the strings become quite sonically unbalanced if you leave out the first violins. But as this clearly cannot be the case, I'll have to continue to scratch my head...


there is a possibility -
maybe those moments you are refering to just don't use violins, but only viola divisi as "deeper" Violin 1 and 2 and celli divisi as "deeper" viola and cello.
Admittedly,
I did not notice that, but it is possible.

Is there no string instruments on the right channel in the pan?

 
 Posted:   Feb 27, 2012 - 1:42 PM   
 By:   Gunnar   (Member)

I haven't listened to the whole score on earphones yet, but in the last tracks (starting with No Man's Land), I can clearly hear violins on the very right, and at some point I think I can pick up the violas more or less on center. Celli and bass are present on the left (if I remember correctly), and there is a conspicuous absence of high strings on the left.
Hm, thinking about it, in that case it would be simply an "American seating plan" in reverse?! I have to check and put my earphones on the wrong way and check if everything sounds right then...

 
 Posted:   Feb 27, 2012 - 2:14 PM   
 By:   Gunnar   (Member)

D'oh. Time for a facepalm in stereo.



Sorry for dragging you into this, Mike. My amplifier had to be repaired last year, and when it came back, I connected the CD player in the wrong way. And never listened to anything on headphones until last night.

Now, everything is in its right place again.

Sorry again for that.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 28, 2012 - 6:09 AM   
 By:   Mike West   (Member)

no need to apologise smile
that's a funny story, indeed - but the strings sound somewhat muffled at times nevertheless I think.

though, this score and film is really remarkable in being completely against hollywood trends, and I love that about it, it is so slow, stageplay-like, gives time and breath in ways absent in most hollywood films-
The Artist is a great film, but it's a stunt actually

I fear both films won't have a lot of influence but would welcome that kind of story-telling also in the big productions

 
 Posted:   Feb 28, 2012 - 7:13 AM   
 By:   Gunnar   (Member)

By the way, this stereo gaffe reminds me that I used to wear headphones in reversed position in the past from time to time, because it helped me in identifying layers and structures in orchestral music that I hadn't noticed before. It's really funny how strongly entrenched the listening habits in terms of orchestral setup can become.

I haven't seen THE ARTIST yet, so I don't know how the music works in that film. As for WAR HORSE, I think I share your doubt that this will catch on in Hollywood. Both film and score seem to me to be the results of two men who simply do things their way because they have achieved a point in their careers where they don't have to care about current trends and sensibilities anymore. That doesn't make what they do automatically great (I'm still a bit divided about the film, not the score), but it definitely makes it interesting. In respect to the film, I really should watch it again and pay more attention to the editing - in my recollection, it was wonderfully old-fashioned in the sense that it had flow and took its time. Something Avid and Final Cut have driven out of many editors. Does anyone know if Michael Kahn edited this one again on a Moviola? I only remember that I read that he went digital for the first time for TINTIN - which makes sense.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 1, 2012 - 11:35 PM   
 By:   Mike_H   (Member)

I can't wait to get the blu-ray and experience this scene again. Absolutely fantastic. I get chills when the camera pulls back at 0:28. It's moments like this that remind me why I love music.


 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2013 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.