 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
I wouldn't mind paying for a "fixed" BEETLEJUICE, where the score is presented chronologically, not arranged into weird suites after the album tracks (I still blame Thor for several of the discs being arranged like this, per his baffling demand that the original album presentations be preserved in Richard Kraft's Elfman Box Request thread... thanks for doing that, and then not even buying the set himself!) It would be nice to have the actual film version of the "Main Titles" too. The one on the box set is not from the film and is not the one on the album. Weird!
|
|
|
|
 |
All these unreleased material could be sumarized on 3 minutes suites on a single album. None of it needs to have more than that amount of music released. It's Elfman. Who really cares?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Don't take YOR wrong. Elfman is nice in a mediocre kind of way. He's much better than Hanzimmer and his pets, tough. But, come on, there are thousands of unreleased / incomplete scores from the true masters. Lets focus on what matters. It is simple logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Elfman maybe matters on this particular tread, but not right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Milly Vanilly was very popular too. Popularity means nothing. Who in his right mind would want the complete score from NACHO LIBRE???
|
|
|
|
 |
Maleficio is right. Elfman really matters. Listen to REAL STEEL . It's outstanding how Elfman writes such subtle material for summer blockbusters ! When the score finishes with a simple piano single note , you just feel like throwing your Jablonsky's cds to the garbagge !
|
|
|
|
 |
YOR agrees that Elfman is better than Zimmer-Jablonsky-Gleeny-Smith-Whatever. But, then again, someone smashing a keyboard with a cat is also better than those people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
The truth must be spoken always. Even when it hurts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
YOR agrees that Elfman is better than Zimmer-Jablonsky-Gleeny-Smith-Whatever. But, then again, someone smashing a keyboard with a cat is also better than those people. Is this individual for real?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Is this individual for real? YOR is real. Believe on him.
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |