 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think if you recheck the thread A&C, you will see you were the first to start with the cheap pot shots (at Horner).
If you consider pointing out vast amounts of (always) uncredited lifts, pilfering, borrows, steals as cheap shots, then guilty as charged. I consider blatant artistic appropriation rather egregious, but then if integrity has any value, no other conclusion can be reached. Also, you are quite right, my "shots" were aimed at Jamie Horner as he was at the heart of the of the discusion, and not at any "dissenters".
It is all fine and well that fans make allowances for Horner's thievery, but there are vast amounts of valuable works that made these scores a reality. To claim them as ones own is profoundly disrespectful to the artists without whom there would be no Jamie Horner. Not to mention lazy.
I've often wondered, in the case of Horner, if any unattributed (to others) music in his scores are the works of composers you've just havent heard of (yet). Not a year goes by without me hearing music that turn out to be the origins of a Horner piece. That is something, in my experience, that it unique to Jamie.
To broadly brush others as deluded, delusional or any other cheap shot does not constitute an argument. But if you want to see five lights, knock yourself out, son. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nice. Deflecting my previous question and then doubling down on your deflection. Politics in your future? The eight ball says: outlook good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes eyes, covers ears!! "Only James Horner did this!! Only James Horner did this!!"
Triple down! Your premise was false as I pointed out earlier, and to which you initially deflected, but yeah, facts are always troublesome. Keep carrying the torch for Jamie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
