 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, TG, Gerrard really doesn't look like Paul Newman. Must be my "fevered imagination."
Is Nanette cute, Bill?
Not in football boots on a sunday morning, no. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Young firecracker just went ewwwww!
She missed the d out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posted: |
Apr 14, 2019 - 9:09 AM
|
|
|
|
By: |
MikeP
(Member)
|
I don't find any joy or purpose in reading a new thread, researching whether there's a previous thread on the subject and then tripping over myself to point out to the unsuspecting poster that said duplicate exists.
Maybe I'm wrong but I don't think that Thor really got your message, Edw. Seems like you are a bit fed up with people who immediately post, "Hey, this topic was posted a few years ago. Use the search engine."
And we do use the engine before we post a new topic, and the engine often does NOT find that previous topic so why jump on the new poster?
I think we should let people respond to the newest topic and maybe after some time let a poster know that in a "far away galaxy" decades ago, we talked about this composer or score or whatever and then post that URL for HISTORICAL perspectives. Am I close, Edw?
I think you're correct joan and you are spot on! It seems to bother the men on the board more than the women. That is NOT a sexist comment, just an observation. Of course, there are fewer of us. Not sure why it gets their shorts in such a bunch. There might be a few more issues that are more important here. 
My shorts don't bunch  I've never understood why it makes some have a hissy fit. As Joan said, the search engine won't find the topic most times anyway.
So what if there was another thread 2 years ago on the same topic? It ain't the end of the world. Don't give it a second thought.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posted: |
Apr 14, 2019 - 12:09 PM
|
|
|
|
By: |
edwzoomom
(Member)
|
I don't find any joy or purpose in reading a new thread, researching whether there's a previous thread on the subject and then tripping over myself to point out to the unsuspecting poster that said duplicate exists.
Maybe I'm wrong but I don't think that Thor really got your message, Edw. Seems like you are a bit fed up with people who immediately post, "Hey, this topic was posted a few years ago. Use the search engine."
And we do use the engine before we post a new topic, and the engine often does NOT find that previous topic so why jump on the new poster?
I think we should let people respond to the newest topic and maybe after some time let a poster know that in a "far away galaxy" decades ago, we talked about this composer or score or whatever and then post that URL for HISTORICAL perspectives. Am I close, Edw?
I think you're correct joan and you are spot on! It seems to bother the men on the board more than the women. That is NOT a sexist comment, just an observation. Of course, there are fewer of us. Not sure why it gets their shorts in such a bunch. There might be a few more issues that are more important here.
My shorts don't bunch I've never understood why it makes some have a hissy fit. As Joan said, the search engine won't find the topic most times anyway.
So what if there was another thread 2 years ago on the same topic? It ain't the end of the world. Don't give it a second thought.
Yea Mike. Glad your shorts don't bunch and welcome to the "good guys on the board club" - joan and I are co-presidents btw.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
