 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You people tell me now----do you want me to continue the Movie/TV News or do you want to do it yourselves?
I fully appreciate all the work you do, and I love the trivia sections!!
Bruce - I emails you a while ago about the Bonds?
He'll probably want you to go round to his place and open up his emails for him about it. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
As I've posted many times before, I don't like posting the Movie/TV News because I have very no interest in comic book movies, Star Wars or zombies---which is the most of what Hollywood is these days. I do this to help my fellow posters. It takes me several hours to do every morning Monday-Friday---that's several hours of time I would rather be sleeping.
I started the trivia feature because that does interest me a little---but it is very time consuming to find photos because Google's new policy means good photos are hard to find.
If someone else thinks they can do a better job, they have my permission to take it over---so I can do things that I want to do.
You people tell me now----do you want me to continue the Movie/TV News or do you want to do it yourselves?
It is an appreciated source of movie information (yes, even the trivia sections), though one wonders—why do something so time-consuming when it brings you so little personal joy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now i must find this apparently unfindable Michael Parks film. Damn you, Dragon. Damn you to heck!
Also, love the updates, thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah drag, its like bob diM n chickenhearted - your work is much appreciated on here.
(Even if remake news depresses me!!!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You people tell me now----do you want me to continue the Movie/TV News or do you want to do it yourselves?
Bruce - I emails you a while ago about the Bonds?
Dont think so?
|
|
|
|
|
|
You people tell me now----do you want me to continue the Movie/TV News or do you want to do it yourselves?
I fully appreciate all the work you do, and I love the trivia sections!!
Bruce - I emails you a while ago about the Bonds?
He'll probably want you to go round to his place and open up his emails for him about it.
Ahahahah!
Btw it is so easy to get folks on this board to do your work for you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Thing from Laurel Polishing!?
The Thing-W from bold canyon?
The golfer from comma county?
|
|
|
|
|
|
You people tell me now----do you want me to continue the Movie/TV News or do you want to do it yourselves?
Bruce - I emails you a while ago about the Bonds?
Dont think so?
Unless the e-mail address in your profile is out of date and someone else somehow has possession of it, we had an e-mail convo between 21st and 24th August?
Conversation?
More like a series of cryptic messages, on your end!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other The Thing from...films you may enjoy:
The Thing from As the World Turns
The Thing from General Hospital
The Thing from the Young and the Restless
The Thing from Guiding Light
The Thing from Ryan's Hope
...and The Thing from Santa Barbara
Don't forget:
The Thing From Up the Khyber
The Thing From Camping
The Thing At Your Convenience
The Thing Abroad
Follow That Camel Thing and Burn It With Flares
and the ever delightful The Thing On Loving
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The BBC adaption was pretty well done, nîcely acted and had a couple of interesting changes at the end. Worth a listen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/21/18003240/kickstarter-the-thing-john-w-campbell-jr-who-goes-there-frozen-hell-wildside-press-horror-novel
So the version being published is not the manuscript as found-
Betancourt described the draft as “fragmentary and pieced together from a partial final draft and a rough draft,” which he” then compared to the published version of ‘Who Goes There?’” Betancourt says that he hopes that the final version lives up to what Campbell originally intended. “I have tried to craft the story into what John W. Campbell would have written, had it appeared in its full form, as originally written.”
I'm slightly confused by this description. It sounds like maybe the second half of "Frozen Hell" wasn't fully polished so they have tried to take the heretofore unseen first half and blend it with the actual published version of the story?
Or maybe there were pieces of story scattered here and there on various pages and it's a matter of piecing them together in a coherent way?
I hope there isn't too much editorial muddling going on behind the scenes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If there were two drafts—a partial final draft and a complete rough draft—then it would make sense to apply the changes in the final draft to the complete rough draft. I imagine that wouldn’t take too much work for a skilled editor. The confusing part is why they would need to compare it to “Who Goes There?”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Besides, it's an indirect compliment that I had higher expectations from your post. 
