Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Oct 27, 2022 - 9:31 PM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

THE FALL OF THE AMERICAN EMPIRE (2018) – 7/10

This French-language Canadian film starts out as a crime thriller, but ends up in a somewhat different place. “Pierre-Paul Daoust” (Alexandre Landry) has a PhD in philosophy, but is reduced to working for a delivery service because, as he says, “Teachers make less than delivery men.” He laments to the girlfriend who is about to break up with him (Florence Longpré) that it is the ignorant who seem to attain wealth and fame rather than intellectuals.

Then, one day as Daoust pulls his van into a parking lot to make a delivery at a business, two robbers burst out of the place with large duffle bags stuffed with millions in cash, followed by a pursuing security guard. A quick gunfight later, the guard and one robber are dead, the other robber is in flight, and the two bags are lying nearly at Daoust’s feet. After a quick moment of indecision, he tosses them in the back of his van, answers a few questions from the arriving police, and is on his way.

Of course, the money belongs to a drug gang, who was using the business as a “bank,” and to launder the cash. In a plot as old as ACROSS 110th STREET, both the cops and the criminals go in search of the cash. Daoust must figure out what to do with the money, while staying one step ahead of the crooks, and particularly the cops, who soon come to suspect him. Towards this end, he enlists the help of high-priced call girl “Camille Lafontaine” (Maripier Morin), whom he initially retained for sex because she went by the name “Aspasie” (an ancient Greek courtesan) in her online profile. For a “financial advisor,” he hooks up with “Sylvain 'The Brain' Bigras” (Rémy Girard), an ex-con who got a business degree while in prison. Along with shady banker “Wilbrod Taschereau” (Pierre Curzi), they concoct a scheme to get wealthy themselves while also furthering Daoust’s philosophy of doing good with money.

It's that latter point that changes the film from just being a tale of greedy people stealing from even greedier people. While Daoust initially comes off as a complaining slacker, we find out that he really has a good heart, volunteering at a local soup kitchen and having a number of friends among its denizens. But if writer-director Denys Arcand has a larger point to make about society’s inequities, it is diminished by the fact that in addition to any social good the money may do, a lot of people end up getting a piece of the pie for themselves before any of it trickles down to the needy. (But, now that I think of it, that may be Arcand’s point.)

Although the location of the action is never specified, the film has an odd title for a picture that is clearly shot in Montreal and populated by Canadians. I suspect it’s because the Quebecois Arcand thinks that the attitudes expressed by most of the characters are distinctly American ones.

 
 Posted:   Oct 30, 2022 - 1:46 AM   
 By:   MusicMad   (Member)

The Bourne Legacy (2012) ... 3+/10

My third viewing ... and the first time I've watched it all - I've previously missed most of the second half, following Cross/Renner meeting/saving Dr. Shearing/Weisz in her old house to the bike chase ...

Somehow I managed to stay awake and for the most part thought it was a fun movie, just not that good. I liked the way the script tried to tie things in with the existing Damon trilogy but this did make some of the plot confusing. But without that it was a mere chase movie and, unlike those earlier films, there was no attempt by our hero to get back at those who controlled him.

All the leads were good, the scenery - especially Canadian mountains - wonderful and some of the action sequences were okay. Cross is clearly not as effective as Bourne in disposing of his opponents smile

The music score by James Newton Howard was ... well, was there one? I can't say I noticed anything until the re-worked end title song (Extreme Ways) kicked in.

 
 Posted:   Oct 30, 2022 - 8:31 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

THEM!- 4.5-5

Another film I probably haven't seen since the 70's? I really had no recollection of the movie other than the life size ant props.

This is a surprisingly solid film with really good direction and competent acting. There's plenty of mystery and tension which leads to set ups and rewards. While the action scenes are brief they're well done.

While it has all the 50's "B" monster movie trappings its played rather seriously without the camp you'd see in later monster films. As I write this it appears this film may have actually started the whole genre so there's that.

If I was to criticize the film it would be the middle third of the film which kinda slumps as it somewhat resets the narrative and redoes what the first third of the film already covered. I would also say the ants were too easily disposed of when under attack. Most of the death scenes happen "off screen" which negates their perceived threat. I'm sure this was for budgetary and technical reasons.

Seeing the film with fresh eyes I can see where Directors like Steven Spielberg got his style of directing from. Its clear films like Aliens and Godzilla (the awful 98 version) took a lot of inspiration from this film.

I read Spock was in this film, but I didn't see him.

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 30, 2022 - 9:34 AM   
 By:   Prince Damian   (Member)



I read Spock was in this film, but I didn't see him.


He was the one wearing a wooly hat, so you wouldn't see his ears.

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 30, 2022 - 10:27 AM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)


I read Spock was in this film, but I didn't see him.

------------------------------------------------------
He was the one wearing a wooly hat, so you wouldn't see his ears.



 
 Posted:   Oct 30, 2022 - 10:34 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)


I read Spock was in this film, but I didn't see him.

------------------------------------------------------
He was the one wearing a wooly hat, so you wouldn't see his ears.





Thxs, Bob. Damn, I remember that scene too. He's unrecognizable without them pointy protrusions!

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 30, 2022 - 1:13 PM   
 By:   Prince Damian   (Member)


I read Spock was in this film, but I didn't see him.

------------------------------------------------------
He was the one wearing a wooly hat, so you wouldn't see his ears.





Thxs, Bob. Damn, I remember that scene too. He's unrecognizable without them pointy protrusions!


Or a wooly hat.

 
 Posted:   Oct 30, 2022 - 7:35 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Tremors- 5-5

Researching this film I was surprised to learn this came out in 1990! For some reason I thought it was the early 80's. I do remember seeing the trailer in the theater and thought it looked awful. I eventually saw it on cable TV after its theatrical run. Now was the time to revisit this little gem.

While I watched the official uncut version of the film I was taken aback by some odd re-dubbing omitting some foul language. Ive since read this was intended to have an "R" rating but the studio afterwards decided to release it as a PG-13 film. Thus the reason for some odd dubs.

I consider this flick "lightning in the bottle". It's got a simple premise, a clever script, an odd but delightful group of characters and a cast with chemistry. The plotting is tight and doesn't over stay its welcome. For a small budget, the special effects hold up really well, both the miniature effects and full size set pieces. The fact most special effects are shot "in camera" shows how timeless a film can be with this technique.

I love the location shooting. The landscapes are gorgeous and the desert town looked appropriately shoddy and broken down. There's lots of nice little details in the film that gives it, it's hick appeal. Like an old buildings roof covered with a canvas held down by stones. Or the protagonist vehicle who's right tail light has the word "right" written on it.

Curious to note this might be one of the few horror films that takes place almost exclusively during the day in bright sunlight! I'm not much of a horror fan, but this hit the sweet spot as a horror/action/comedy without being to gory. It all came together for me.

 
 Posted:   Oct 30, 2022 - 7:37 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)


I read Spock was in this film, but I didn't see him.

------------------------------------------------------
He was the one wearing a wooly hat, so you wouldn't see his ears.



Thxs, Bob. Damn, I remember that scene too. He's unrecognizable without them pointy protrusions!


Or a wooly hat.


You're never going to let me un-see that, are you?

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 31, 2022 - 1:26 AM   
 By:   Prince Damian   (Member)

big grin


 
 Posted:   Oct 31, 2022 - 7:14 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

big grin




That should be standard Starfleet garb for Vulcan's on away missions. wink

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 31, 2022 - 11:39 AM   
 By:   henry   (Member)

Tremors- 5-5

Researching this film I was surprised to learn this came out in 1990! For some reason I thought it was the early 80's. I do remember seeing the trailer in the theater and thought it looked awful. I eventually saw it on cable TV after its theatrical run. Now was the time to revisit this little gem.

While I watched the official uncut version of the film I was taken aback by some odd re-dubbing omitting some foul language. Ive since read this was intended to have an "R" rating but the studio afterwards decided to release it as a PG-13 film. Thus the reason for some odd dubs.

I consider this flick "lightning in the bottle". It's got a simple premise, a clever script, an odd but delightful group of characters and a cast with chemistry. The plotting is tight and doesn't over stay its welcome. For a small budget, the special effects hold up really well, both the miniature effects and full size set pieces. The fact most special effects are shot "in camera" shows how timeless a film can be with this technique.

I love the location shooting. The landscapes are gorgeous and the desert town looked appropriately shoddy and broken down. There's lots of nice little details in the film that gives it, it's hick appeal. Like an old buildings roof covered with a canvas held down by stones. Or the protagonist vehicle who's right tail light has the word "right" written on it.

Curious to note this might be one of the few horror films that takes place almost exclusively during the day in bright sunlight! I'm not much of a horror fan, but this hit the sweet spot as a horror/action/comedy without being to gory. It all came together for me.


Hi Solium! I remember the first time I saw TREMORS, my uncle rented it along with CHRISTMAS VACATION back in 1990 and I quite enjoyed both of them.smile

 
 Posted:   Oct 31, 2022 - 2:14 PM   
 By:   MusicMad   (Member)

Harvey (1950) ... 7/10

Despite its fabulous cast, the great witty script and excellent direction/filming ... it doesn't quite reach the level of entertainment I expect of it. As a child I didn't think much of it. Both times viewed on DVD (2004 and now) I've struggled to stay with it, which is a shame.

James Stewart is, of course, perfect ... he is Elwood P. Dowd ... but the character is similar to Gary Cooper's Longfellow Deeds and maybe that is to Dowd's disadvantage. The antics of seeking to intern Dowds is also reminiscent of Arsenic and Old Lace which I've enjoyed several times ... Josephine Hull being a link to that earlier film.

And, of course, JS played the almost too good to be true George Bailey in the unbeatable It's a Wonderful Life (1946) ... where he encountered a visible angel as opposed to an invisible giant white rabbit.

So perhaps it's my perceived view that the film lacks originality which is my problem.

A lovely score by Frank Skinner ... a lovely film I should enjoy more!

 
 Posted:   Oct 31, 2022 - 3:05 PM   
 By:   MusicMad   (Member)

The Day of the Locust (1975) ... 3/10

And the marks are for the filmmaking, acting and - of course - music score. It was never a film which I desired to see but I bought the DVD in 2006 because I wanted to hear more of John Barry's music. I'd bought the vinyl LP back in 1975/6 but been disappointed at the amount of non-Barry music thereon. Worse still: there was a cue, called the same as the film's title - the longest track - which I didn't like! The first (and only!) time a piece of John Barry music was a failure ...

I started to watch the film and got not much further than the main titles ... so the DVD went back on the shelf. And 10 years later Intrada released the full score et al. ... wonderful, now I had no need to watch the film smile

But in seeking to declutter frown I decided yesterday to give the DVD another try. I forget the number of times I asked myself why I was watching it ... there was no character I liked, the story was - at best - unpleasant and the script was very poor with many scenes ending with no resolution, timelines making little sense, and character motivation being almost non-existent.

Both Homer/Donald Sutherland and Tod/William Atherton are taken with Faye/Karen Black and the story related revolves around her disdain for both whilst using each to further her non-existent career and self-centred lifestyle. Burgess Meredith brings some pathos to his role - which leads to an extended and tedious funeral sequence of little importance ... and the ending, horrific and sickening, comes from nowhere. Yes, Homer has finally accepted he's been used but there's no explanation as to why he walks to the film premiere carrying suitcases; the thoroughly despicable child actor taunts him - but why throw a stone at him?

The recent tragedy (one of many) in which people were crushed makes the ending even more difficult to watch. The best sequence, for me, was the filming of the battle scenes and the collapsing stage, leading to the film bosses assessing how best to make someone responsible.

This is not the first, or last, film to portray Hollywood as the place of nightmares ... I won't watch it again.

Happily I now enjoy the period songs and exposure to the great works of Stravinsky, Bartók, Schoenberg and others means I no longer consider Barry's The Day of the Locust cue too avant-garde for my taste smile

 
 Posted:   Oct 31, 2022 - 3:07 PM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

Saw this a few months ago Mitch.
Tedious and slow, agree with your mark, and the Ending is bonkers.

 
 Posted:   Nov 1, 2022 - 1:05 PM   
 By:   MusicMad   (Member)

As I've said before, Bill, there are times - few! - in which we agree smile

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 2, 2022 - 10:36 AM   
 By:   Prince Damian   (Member)

Hercules, Samson and Ulysses(1963) 8/10
With Kirk Morris and Richard Lloyd

Hercules and his men go after a sea monster. The get shipwrecked in Judea. Herc must capture Samson for the Philistines, to ensure his crew's release. He joins up with Samson to overthrow the hiss, boo king( played by wotzizname, the drunk general in the good the bad and the ugly), which they do by bringing the house down, literally.
This one was above average, for the genre. Decently made, good looking sets and some nice locations. Also it wasn't too stupid, with a fairly straightforward plot. AFLs music was OK but not remarkable, a bit more restrained.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 4, 2022 - 3:47 PM   
 By:   henry   (Member)

TOP GUN: MAVERICK 10-10!

I just bought this on Blu-ray today without having seen it, and I absolutely loved it! It's my favorite film of the year, and one of my all time favorites!

 
 Posted:   Nov 4, 2022 - 11:31 PM   
 By:   Warlok   (Member)

Samaritan

7/10

I love the tragic hero, the fallen character, tormented by history, knowledge, and limitation. So I like Sly's Samaritan. The film could easily fit within the Unbreakable universe. That said, various aspects are not executed as well as they could have been. With The Boys, we see the benefit of full R blood and violence - Samaritan would have been better for that. Some scene edits, a few moments of dialogue seem clumsy. And the main villain is not properly/adequately fleshed out... winding up far less dimensional than we would like.

Still worth a viewing. With tighter scripting & oversight I'd like to see more.

 
 Posted:   Nov 5, 2022 - 2:47 AM   
 By:   MusicMad   (Member)

The Third Secret (1964) ... 3/10

Mediocre ... no: poor ... British 'B' movie which has a good pedigree (cast, director, settings) and a promising storyline ... which is thrown away by being mundane and so clearly signposted from the start that the only reason to watch is to find out what the title means!

An eminent psychologist (or was that: psychiatrist?) is found dead, supposedly suicide ... only his daughter doesn't accept this and encourages one of his former patients to investigate. The investigation amounts to very little and given we're told he may not be totally sane could it be that he is the murderer?

A few other former patients are brought into the story so as to create a pool of suspects ... whilst the words from the dying man, repeated at least once, identify the guilty person at about the first quarter mark leaving the remaining hour+ to play out, looking for the answer to what is the third secret.

I've never been a fan of Stephen Boyd and he plays the lead character as leaden and uninteresting. Other well-known faces fill supporting roles and Pamela Franklin as the crusading daughter is the strongest presence ... only her 14 year old character doesn't ring true.

A film of its time ... we tried guessing the current value of the riverside houses smile ... I was inclined to watch partly by the suggested storyline (oh dear!) and partly because a recent thread had discussed the score ... a composer whose name/work I didn't/don't know: Richard Arnell.

The score was sparse but largely enjoyable and appropriate. I don't think any recording is available but I shall look out for any works (incl. non-film) by Arnell. I was amused to read of his life ... according to IMDb he was married eight times ... and lived to be 91 ... surely a contradiction! smile

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.