Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2020 - 12:20 PM   
 By:   leagolfer   (Member)

Could someone please provide a list of FSM's most easily-triggered SJWs?

I've only just found-out what Zimmer RC & SJW is this bellyaching babyhood was my finder.

 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2020 - 1:55 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

That's because it's a pejorative term.

I disagree. So many horrible wrongs have been rectified by certain SJWs.


You can disagree but you're wrong. The definition is what it is. Regardless what good you think you're doing for society has nothing to do with what it means.

 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2020 - 2:28 PM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

Well, I would raise my hand as one of the most easily triggered along with a few other women and quite a few men at FSM. The Woke and SJW put downs are offensive to some of us.
Don't know how to answer Octoberman's question. Not sure I understand it. However, Ock, I do know that I have always thought of you as one of the nicest gentlemen on this board, and now I fear that in the last year or so, you are being lured to the "Dark side." Hope you will say in Rey and Luke Skywalker's light. smile



Thank you for the props, Joan, that's very sweet of you to say.
And you may be right in that there has been a change in the last little while.

What I have been noticing is that some of the members here have become far too quick to leap upon anything that they can label as offensive for its own sake.
When it happens, it invariably takes the form of someone so eager to accuse another of having no tolerance or enlightenment, and that it is somehow their job to enlighten another.
And in their rush to do so, they are showing far more intolerance than the ones they are lecturing to.
It does not help their case that, in addition to the torches and pitchforks that they wield, they cannot verbally communicate in a calm and respectful manner.
F-bombs and insults drop like flies, and it is NEVER the ones who are being accused that do it.
It's almost as though, in their effort to expose the monsters, they themselves become the monsters.
That's not what this place is supposed to be about, but this venue is being co-opted for that agenda.

And the fact that these dust-ups usually occur over silly Star Wars movies makes it all the more absurd.
I get it that these movies are important to a lot of people (on both sides of the aisle, me included), but if someone can't sit back, have a laugh and allow for opposing opinions, then they are the problem--and not quite the solution that they think themselves as being.

So if there has, in fact, been a change at all, it's that I am losing patience with those who would berate me for not thinking like them.
I don't take the insults to heart. I laugh at it.
When someone insults me in pursuit of winning an argument or a debate, they've already lost.

Lastly (and I know I was pretty long-winded here), I do not include you in with who I'm talking about.
We all have our triggers, but I think some of the folks here need to examine what it is exactly that triggers them, and maybe not give in to it so much. Just to say they are triggered isn't enough to justify the attacks I've seen here lately.
(I suspect, though I have no facts to back this up, that the ones squawking the loudest tend to be on the younger side. It's just a feeling. Age+experience=wisdom, and that's what they may be lacking, for the time being at least.)

(Postscript to my little novel here: my comment earlier was in reference to how Marshall was evaporated. I'm not saying that the people who wanted him gone didn't have a point. I just don't think someone's relative worth should be decided by whoever is the most pissed off at any given moment. The Mods are there to weigh the options, not put it to a general vote. But as I've said many times before, it's not my playground and if I don't like it then it's on me to decide to leave.)

Jeez, that was long!
See what happens when you ask me something?
big grin

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2020 - 3:17 PM   
 By:   joan hue   (Member)

I have no problem with varying opinions on films, Ock. I'm triggered by the SJW comments and the "Woke" comments. Many SJWs are not bad people but just supporters of social justice and as I said, I worry about you being lured to the Dark Side. (Note the Dumbo thread.) Rights for minorities, gays, and women seem to be positive aspects about living in America. But you have the right to your opinion, and I agree that the vehement attacks full of F words don't help. I don't care for Woke comments because too often they are a put down of diversity and women. It is hard to read comments like, "I support women, especially when they are neked."

I usually, but not always, find our younger members not caring for the woke and SJW comments.

A micro example that ought to relax white guys is to note that Charlies Angels bombed and Ford vs Ferrari beat the crap out of Charlies Angels. A macro example is just look at the top 10 richest Americans according to Forbes. I do not think SJWs will harm white male dominance for a long, very long time, so I don't see the harm in minorities or females starting to ask for a little bit larger piece of the American pie.

Oh well, no use in debating this. Minds don't change.

 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2020 - 3:24 PM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

I think I get what you are saying Joan.
But like I said, I am not lumping you in with the crowd I was talking about.

To those people, I simply say, it will be a little more helpful in understanding your point of view if you are not insulting me and swearing at me. Your hostility is misdirected and pointless because you do not know me from Adam.
Civil discourse is where it's at. Nothing is possible without it.
That was my main point and I fear that everything else I was yammering on about may have obscured it.

 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2020 - 3:26 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

I don't care for Woke comments because too often they are a put down of diversity and women. It is hard to read comments like, "I support women, especially when they are neked."

I usually, but not always, find our younger members not caring for the woke and SJW comments.


LMAO! You deserved that for trolling me. Stop pretending you have some higher moral authority, you don't.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2020 - 3:39 PM   
 By:   joan hue   (Member)

I did get your main point, Oct, and it is a good one.


you don't.

IMHO, I do. smile

 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2020 - 3:41 PM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

So anyway, back to topic:

Why do I need to turn down the music to parallel park?

 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2020 - 3:44 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)


A micro example that ought to relax white guys is to note that Charlies Angels bombed and Ford vs Ferrari beat the crap out of Charlies Angels. A macro example is just look at the top 10 richest Americans according to Forbes. I do not think SJWs will harm white male dominance for a long, very long time, so I don't see the harm in minorities or females starting to ask for a little bit larger piece of the American pie.


Top ten? You do realize there are 328 million people in America right? Did you know the CEO's who run America's biggest war profiteering companies are mostly female? You've come a long way baby.

 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2020 - 3:41 AM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

Why would Anton Räderscheidt and Marta Hegemann divorce?

Why?

Why?

Why?!?

 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2020 - 8:01 AM   
 By:   jackfu   (Member)

I don’t want to post the reply that gets this thread shut down, nor do I want to beat a dead horse.
But, if I may, I think much of the problem in which we Boomers get so annoyed with some of the "SJW", or "Woke" types if you will, is that we lived during the time of and perhaps experienced or had friends whom did experience the struggles of the civil rights and Women’s lib movements and such and remember vividly folks that had fire hoses trained on them, dogs sicced on them, and so on. At least we saw it on the nightly news and read about it in the newspapers, etc., real-time.
So, when we hear the complaints of younger folks nowadays about oppression and repression they face, it rings a little hollow to us. Not that we’re better than they.
I’m not saying people don’t face obstacles today, but compared to those whom lost their lives or were beaten, oppressed, repressed, jailed, etc., the idea that there are not enough movies created by, starring,- whomever it may be – that such is somehow equivalent to those real-life struggles?
It may be that we get the wrong impression and they’re not really making that comparison, but with some of the more vocal elements it can sure sound like it sometimes and then we old geezers get upset with that.
Okay and “Get off my lawn!”

wink

 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2020 - 8:17 AM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

Jack's making sense!
GET HIM!

 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2020 - 8:24 AM   
 By:   jackfu   (Member)

Jack's making sense!
GET HIM!


wink "Come over here, you hot monster!"

 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2020 - 8:45 AM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

Why is no one surprised that Harlan Ellison was correct when he wrote "bad stuff" about Star Trek and Star Wars in 1979?

 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2020 - 8:51 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Jack's making sense!


Its called virtue singling and a certain like minded group are being played.

 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2020 - 8:58 AM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

Its called virtue singling and a certain like minded group are being played.


Hang on, what I understood Jack to be saying is that the young, noisy "activists" of today did not go through what we "oldsters" went through, but they are behaving as though they did.
Did I misunderstand?

 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2020 - 9:03 AM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

Why is no one surprised that Harlan Ellison was correct when he wrote "bad stuff" about Star Trek and Star Wars in 1979?


I love Harlan to death (mine, not his), but even he came to realize that the story he turned in was unfilmable.
It had to have changes in order for it to work in the boundaries that GR had already laid out.
But I do understand his frustration, and poking fun at ST and SW is too irresistible to pass up.
Like shooting sci-fi fish in a barrel.

Sorry, I know that wasn't a question.

 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2020 - 9:06 AM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

Can't we just read the stupid question, smile (or frown), and then move on to the next stupid question?

 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2020 - 9:08 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Its called virtue singling and a certain like minded group are being played.


Hang on, what I understood Jack to be saying is that the young, noisy "activists" of today did not go through what we "oldsters" went through, but they are behaving as though they did.
Did I misunderstand?


My response was more directly regarding this quote:

"I’m not saying people don’t face obstacles today, but compared to those whom lost their lives or were beaten, oppressed, repressed, jailed, etc., the idea that there are not enough movies created by, starring,- whomever it may be – that such is somehow equivalent to those real-life struggles?"

 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2020 - 9:08 AM   
 By:   jackfu   (Member)

Why is no one surprised that Harlan Ellison was correct when he wrote "bad stuff" about Star Trek and Star Wars in 1979?


Interesting Jim.
Now, my Stupid Question: Was Ellison just bitter because he didn't get the last say on his script for The City on the Edge of Forever? wink

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.