 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes guys that one with the IMDb link is indeed the semi professional one, and that's being generous. I know a fan production when I see one, and compared to what some have done on YT these days (the Star Trek and the Tolkien things for example) it's TERRIBLE! Don't get me wrong, full marks to these people for trying very hard. It will have taken a lot of dedication etc to make, but....yeah. I had it imported too like the guy in the review, and I never got through it all.
Whatever one might think about the BBC one, it is at least a professional production, and therefore worthy of consideration. For my money it's fine. Until the one we all want comes along. As I said, it is at least the first to have the more-or-less correction time period and setting. And tripods.
Sorry about the link Octoberman, but being a technophobe I don't know how to rectify the glitch, so if anyone wants to do it feel free. They did it with one I posted on one of the silly threads (the beer or snack one I think). Of course I'll refrain from making the same mistake again... hopefully..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is another pic of the poster that Paul linked to.
Paul, all you would need to do is delete the link from your original post, and then cut and paste this one in it's place.
It's those really long codes that make the webpage go goofy and cause it to over-extend the horizontal layout.
That's a great poster though. I always loved it.
Still a fantastic movie, all in all.
Cheers. I managed to do the first bit and delete it. The rest is largely irrelevant, since it's not crucial to my actual text and is now on here twice. So I can repeat my expression that I reckon the designer of the BBC version might also be a fan of that image as I think it's not unlike the Martian from the BBC production. Small potatoes to some maybe, but possible proof that some within it's crew was a fan of the good stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers. I managed to do the first bit and delete it. The rest is largely irrelevant, since it's not crucial to my actual text and is now on here twice. So I can repeat my expression that I reckon the designer of the BBC version might also be a fan of that image as I think it's not unlike the Martian from the BBC production. Small potatoes to some maybe, but possible proof that some within it's crew was a fan of the good stuff.
Thank you, Paul.
It was making my eyes wonky the way it was.
Accordingly, I'll remove the link code I posted.
There's no need for it to be repeated (except for the fact that it's an amazing poster!  )
It sure is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perfectly good show whatever ANYONE says!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't forget Joan, I said perfectly good - not perfect.. That is, not without it's problems but still reasonably entertaining.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't that the one with hardly ANYTHING to do with Wells other than there's BEEN an invasion? I can understand it being a better show. The title is a bit odd that's all. I mean, ANY invasion from outside the Earth could be called War of the Worlds...
Of course I'd give it a go myself if it was on anything I get. Is it true they have robot dogs roaming around?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
