Do you think the Goldsmith Grifters acted with malice aforethought, or did they just realize that hustling FSM types would be easier than taking candy from a slow, orphaned baby in a one-wheeled stroller?
Why do FSM score nerds cheer the success and FAILURE of certain films like they've got money invested in them (they haven't)?
But we are invested in them. Not for money but for the arts. Advocating for originality, creativity, and quality over mediocrity is a fight worth having.
Why do FSM score nerds cheer the success and FAILURE of certain films like they've got money invested in them (they haven't)?
But we are invested in them. Not for money but for the arts. Advocating for originality, creativity, and quality over mediocrity is a fight worth having.
I would venture to say that judging the originality, creativity, and quality of a film or film score is completely subjective to an audience. Further, an audience is generally composed of people whose intention is to view the film or listen to the score in its entirety rather than just viewing a trailer or listening to a few cues. It's logical that an audience wishes to find a film or a score memorable and entertaining. What is original, creative and has quality to me may be stale, sterile or inferior to someone else. Of course, there are films and scores that fail the taste test altogether. All of us on this board are 100% invested in the arts and feel it's something important to fight for. This is what keeps this board going and is behind the support so many are showing for Lukas and the modernization of the FSM board.
Why do FSM score nerds cheer the success and FAILURE of certain films like they've got money invested in them (they haven't)?
But we are invested in them. Not for money but for the arts. Advocating for originality, creativity, and quality over mediocrity is a fight worth having.
Re: I Eat Poop.
Still more original than a shot by shot remake of a 15 year old cartoon.
