Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Oct 11, 2002 - 2:23 PM   
 By:   Ron Pulliam   (Member)

From the Boston Globe:

By Walter V. Robinson, Globe Staff, 5/23/2000

AUSTIN, Texas - After George W. Bush became governor in 1995, the Houston Air National Guard unit he had served with during the Vietnam War years honored him for his work, noting that he flew an F-102 fighter-interceptor until his discharge in October 1973.
And Bush himself, in his 1999 autobiography, ''A Charge to Keep,'' recounts the thrills of his pilot training, which he completed in June 1970. ''I continued flying with my unit for the next several years,'' the governor wrote.

But both accounts are contradicted by copies of Bush's military records, obtained by the Globe. In his final 18 months of military service in 1972 and 1973, Bush did not fly at all. And for much of that time, Bush was all but unaccounted for: For a full year, there is no record that he showed up for the periodic drills required of part-time guardsmen.

(Poster's Note: That legally made him a DESERTER)

Bush, who declined to be interviewed on the issue, said through a spokesman that he has ''some recollection'' of attending drills that year, but maybe not consistently.

From May to November 1972, Bush was in Alabama working in a US Senate campaign, and was required to attend drills at an Air National Guard unit in Montgomery. But there is no evidence in his record that he did so. And William Turnipseed, the retired general who commanded the Alabama unit back then, said in an interview last week that Bush never appeared for duty there.

After the election, Bush returned to Houston. But seven months later, in May 1973, his two superior officers at Ellington Air Force Base could not perform his annual evaluation covering the year from May 1, 1972 to April 30, 1973 because, they wrote, ''Lt. Bush has not been observed at this unit during the period of this report.''

Bush, they mistakenly concluded, had been training with the Alabama unit for the previous 12 months. Both men have since died. But Ellington's top personnel officer at the time, retired Colonel Rufus G. Martin, said he had believed that First Lieutenant Bush completed his final year of service in Alabama.

A Bush spokesman, Dan Bartlett, said after talking with the governor that Bush recalls performing some duty in Alabama and ''recalls coming back to Houston and doing [Guard] duty, though he does not recall if it was on a consistent basis.''

Noting that Bush, by that point, was no longer flying, Bartlett added, ''It's possible his presence and role became secondary.''

Last night, Mindy Tucker, another Bush campaign aide, asserted that the governor ''fulfilled all of his requirements in the Guard.'' If he missed any drills, she said, he made them up later on.

Under Air National Guard rules at the time, guardsmen who missed duty could be reported to their Selective Service Board and inducted into the Army as draftees.

If Bush's interest in Guard duty waned, as spokesman Bartlett hinted, the records and former Guard officials suggest that Bush's unit was lackadaisical in holding him to his commitment. Many states, Texas among them, had a record during the Vietnam War of providing a haven in the Guard for the sons of the well-connected, and a tendency to excuse shirking by those with political connections.

(Poster's Note: THIS is what the National Guard is best-known for)

Those who trained and flew with Bush, until he gave up flying in April 1972, said he was among the best pilots in the 111th Fighter-Interceptor Squadron. In the 22-month period between the end of his flight training and his move to Alabama, Bush logged numerous hours of duty, well above the minimum requirements for so-called ''weekend warriors.''

Indeed, in the first four years of his six-year commitment, Bush spent the equivalent of 21 months on active duty, including 18 months in flight school. His Democratic opponent, Vice President Al Gore, who enlisted in the Army for two years and spent five months in Vietnam, logged only about a month more active service, since he won an early release from service.

Still, the puzzling gap in Bush's military service is likely to heighten speculation about the conspicuous underachievement that marked the period between his 1968 graduation from Yale University and his 1973 entry into Harvard Business School. It is speculation that Bush has helped to fuel: For example, he refused for months last year to say whether he had ever used illegal drugs. Subsequently, however, Bush amended his stance, saying that he had not done so since 1974.

The period in 1972 and 1973 when Bush sidestepped his military obligation coincides with a well-publicized incident during the 1972 Christmas holidays: Bush had a confrontation with his father after he took his younger brother, Marvin, out drinking and returned to the family's Washington home after knocking over some garbage cans on the ride home.

In his autobiography, Bush says that his decision to go to business school the following September was ''a turning point for me.''
Assessing Bush's military service three decades later is no easy task: Some of his superiors are no longer alive. Others declined to comment, or, understandably, cannot recall details about Bush's comings and goings. And as Bush has risen in public life over the last several years, Texas military officials have put many of his records off-limits and heavily redacted many other pages, ostensibly because of privacy rules.

But 160 pages of his records, assembled by the Globe from a variety of sources and supplemented by interviews with former Guard officials, paint a picture of an Air Guardsman who enjoyed favored treatment on several occasions.

The ease of Bush's entry into the Air Guard was widely reported last year. At a time when such billets were coveted and his father was a Houston congressman, Bush vaulted to the top of a waiting list of 500. Bush and his father have denied that he received any preferential treatment. But last year, Ben Barnes, who was speaker of the Texas House in 1968, said in a sworn deposition in a civil lawsuit that he called Guard officials seeking a Guard slot for Bush after a friend of Bush's father asked him to do so.

Before he went to basic training, Bush was approved for an automatic commission as a second lieutenant and assignment to flight school despite a score of just 25 percent on a pilot aptitude test. Such commissions were not uncommon, although most often they went to prospective pilots who had college ROTC courses or prior Air Force experience. Bush had neither.

In interviews last week, Guard officials from that era said Bush leapfrogged over other applicants because few applicants were willing to commit to the 18 months of flight training or the inherent dangers of flying.

As a pilot, the future governor appeared to do well. After eight weeks of basic training in the summer of 1968 - and a two-month break to work on a Senate race in Florida - Bush attended 55 weeks of flight school at Moody Air Force Base in Georgia, from November 1968 to November 1969, followed by five months of full-time training on the F-102 back at Ellington.
Retired Colonel Maurice H. Udell, Bush's instructor in the F-102, said he was impressed with Bush's talent and his attitude. ''He had his boots shined, his uniform pressed, his hair cut and he said, `Yes, sir' and `No, sir,''' the instructor recalled.

Said Udell, ''I would rank him in the top 5 percent of pilots I knew. And in the thinking department, he was in the top 1 percent. He was very capable and tough as a boot.''

But 22 months after finishing his training, and with two years left on his six-year commitment, Bush gave up flying - for good, it would turn out. He sought permission to do ''equivalent training'' at a Guard unit in Alabama, where he planned to work for several months on the Republican Senate campaign of Winton Blount, a friend of Bush's father. The proposed move took Bush off flight status, since no Alabama Guard unit had the F-102 he was trained to fly.

At that point, starting in May 1972, First Lieutenant Bush began to disappear from the Guard's radar screen.
When the Globe first raised questions about this period earlier this month, Bartlett, Bush's spokesman, referred a reporter to Albert Lloyd Jr., a retired colonel who was the Texas Air Guard's personnel director from 1969 to 1995.

Lloyd, who a year ago helped the Bush campaign make sense of the governor's military records, said Bush's aides were concerned about the gap in his records back then.

On May 24, 1972, after he moved to Alabama, Bush made a formal request to do his equivalent training at the 9921st Air Reserve Squadron at Maxwell Air Force Base in Alabama. Two days later, that unit's commander, Lieutenant Colonel Reese H. Bricken, agreed to have Bush join his unit temporarily.

In Houston, Bush's superiors approved. But a higher headquarters disapproved, noting that Bricken's unit did not have regular drills.
''We met just one weeknight a month. We were only a postal unit. We had no airplanes. We had no pilots. We had no nothing,'' Bricken said in an interview.

Last week, Lloyd said he is mystified why Bush's superiors at the time approved duty at such a unit.

Inexplicably, months went by with no resolution to Bush's status - and no Guard duty. Bush's evident disconnection from his Guard duties was underscored in August, when he was removed from flight status for failing to take his annual flight physical.

Finally, on Sept. 5, 1972, Bush requested permission to do duty for September, October, and November at the 187th Tactical Recon Group in Montgomery. Permission was granted, and Bush was directed to report to Turnipseed, the unit's commander.

In interviews last week, Turnipseed and his administrative officer at the time, Kenneth K. Lott, said they had no memory of Bush ever reporting.

'Had he reported in, I would have had some recall, and I do not,'' Turnipseed said. ''I had been in Texas, done my flight training there. If we had had a first lieutenant from Texas, I would have remembered.''
Lloyd, the retired Texas Air Guard official, said he does not know whether Bush performed duty in Alabama. ''If he did, his drill attendance should have been certified and sent to Ellington, and there would have been a record. We cannot find the records to show he fulfilled the requirements in Alabama,'' he said.

Indeed, Bush's discharge papers list his service and duty station for each of his first four years in the Air Guard. But there is no record of training listed after May 1972, and no mention of any service in Alabama. On that discharge form, Lloyd said, ''there should have been an entry for the period between May 1972 and May 1973.''
Said Lloyd, ''It appeared he had a bad year. He might have lost interest, since he knew he was getting out.''

In an effort last year to solve the puzzle, Lloyd said he scoured Guard records, where he found two ''special orders'' commanding Bush to appear for active duty on nine days in May 1973. That is the same month that Lieutenant Colonel William D. Harris Jr. and Lieutenant Colonel Jerry B. Killian effectively declared Bush missing from duty.

(Poster's Note: That's DESERTER STATUS, folks!!!!!)

In Bush's annual efficiency report, dated May 2, 1973, the two supervising pilots did not rate Bush for the prior year, writing, ''Lt. Bush has not been observed at this unit during the period of report. A civilian occupation made it necessary for him to move to Montgomery, Alabama. He cleared this base on 15 May 1972 and has been performing equivalent training in a non-flying status with the 187 Tac Recon Gp, Dannelly ANG Base, Alabama.''
Asked about that declaration, campaign spokesman Bartlett said Bush told him that since he was no longer flying, he was doing ''odds and ends'' under different supervisors whose names he could not recall.
But retired colonel Martin, the unit's former administrative officer, said he too thought Bush had been in Alabama for that entire year. Harris and Killian, he said, would have known if Bush returned to duty at Ellington. And Bush, in his autobiography, identifies the late colonel Killian as a friend, making it even more likely that Killian knew where Bush was.
Lieutenant Bush, to be sure, had gone off flying status when he went to Alabama. But had he returned to his unit in November 1972, there would have been no barrier to him flying again, except passing a flight physical. Although the F-102 was being phased out, his unit's records show that Guard pilots logged thousands of hours in the F-102 in 1973.
During his search, Lloyd said, the only other paperwork he discovered was a single torn page bearing Bush's social security number and numbers awarding some points for Guard duty. But the partial page is undated. If it represents the year in question, it leaves unexplained why Bush's two superior officers would have declared him absent for the full year.
There is no doubt that Bush was in Houston in late 1972 and early 1973. During that period, according to Bush's autobiography, he held a civilian job working for an inner-city, antipoverty program in the city.
Lloyd, who has studied the records extensively, said he is an admirer of the governor and believes ''the governor honestly served his country and fulfilled his commitment.''
But Lloyd said it is possible that since Bush had his sights set on discharge and the unit was beginning to replace the F-102s, Bush's superiors told him he was not ''in the flow chart. Maybe George Bush took that as a signal and said, `Hell, I'm not going to bother going to drills.'

'Well, then it comes rating time, and someone says, `Oh...he hasn't fulfilled his obligation.' I'll bet someone called him up and said, `George, you're in a pickle. Get your ass down here and perform some duty.' And he did,'' Lloyd said.

That would explain, Lloyd said, the records showing Bush cramming so many drills into May, June, and July 1973. During those three months, Bush spent 36 days on duty.

Bush's last day in uniform before he moved to Cambridge was July 30, 1973. His official release from active duty was dated Oct. 1, 1973, eight months before his six-year commitment was scheduled to end.

Officially, the period between May 1972 and May 1973 remains unaccounted for. In November 1973, responding to a request from the headquarters of the Air National Guard for Bush's annual evaluation for that year, Martin, the Ellington administrative officer, wrote, ''Report for this period not available for administrative reasons.''

*********************************

The UCMJ has court-martial requirements for absenteeism less severe than this. In time of war, desertion is punishable by firing squad.

Good thing for Dubya Congress never declared a war for the Vietnam "crisis."

In retrospect, it's incredibly sad about Navy Admiral Mike Boorda who, as CNO (senior officer), killed himself rather over the shame he felt because someone complained he was wearing a "ribbon" to which he was not entitled (many agreed was not a major faux pas and a mistake easily made and corrected).

His was a tragic and hopeless act borne of a sense of honor....but at least he HAD honor!

 
 Posted:   Oct 11, 2002 - 2:28 PM   
 By:   Ron Pulliam   (Member)


Is George W. Bush a deserter?
By Ollie Dawshed


October 23, 2000 | Is George W. Bush a deserter? That's the inescapable conclusion of investigative journalism by the online magazine www.TomPaine.com.

The story of how this came to light is a true American original. Iowa farmer Marty Heldt was fed up with the phony media coverage his TV and newspaper were giving him. Walter Robinson of the Boston Globe had reported that there were questions about whether candidate George W. Bush had fulfilled his National Guard duty or received preferential treatment. Heldt began raising questions in a series of articles he wrote for Online Journal, then he filed a Freedom of Information Act request for Bush's military records.

What he found stunned him. According to Heldt, it was plain that after Bush received his training, he walked away from his National Guard duty to work on a political campaign and never served his full time. This was the Vietnam War, and would have been punished most severely-- had Bush not been a son of the rich and powerful. Heldt then wrote about his findings in an article he posted to his web site and sent to Online Journal. Then, working with the professional journalists at TomPaine.com, Heldt wrote the first of what have proven to be a groundbreaking series of articles.

As with other evidence of Bush dishonesty, the media ignored the story. George Magazine wrote a detailed rebuttal to Heldt's work claiming that Bush had minimally fulfilled his requirements. Salon magazine wrote a vapid echo of the George piece without even doing the professionally-basic footwork of interviewing Heldt. And then, in examining the documents that George had posted online, lightning struck.

The key document that George had relied upon for its evidence that Bush had served was a sheet purporting to represent George Bush's record for the missing year. But the sheet was torn so that no sign of the name of the serviceman, except a W, was evident. The months for which the time served were obscured. It had handwriting on it that purported to show that Bush had served his full time. And so it was clear that this document was not the version as sent from the national archives. But additionally, according to the Boston Globe, these records had been added to the file in the last two years. The Bush campaign, working with a retired Guard officer, Albert Lloyd, Jr., managed to add records to the national archives, perhaps yet another example of how the privileged and powerful are allowed to vary from standard operating procedure at will.

The George rebuttal was wrong in many ways. The magazine had erred in assuming that members of the National Guard were awarded a fixed number of gratuitous points annually. The magazine had evidently relied on the handwriting on the document to reach the conclusion Bush had served-- but failed to disclose to its readers that the handwriting was not in the original. And the magazine stubbornly ignored the summation of attendance points typed on the documents, a summation which makes it clear that Bush did not fulfill his requirements. George also refused to credit his Texas commander's written statement from the time that Bush had not been observed, arguing speciously that the commander had erred on a peripheral matter and therefore was not trustworthy to know which officers were or were not on his post.

The question of where Bush was during the missing period, or why he ceased to fly after receiving training is disputed. Bush himself was dishonest about the matter in his biography, claiming that he continued to fly, even though he applied for alternate duty in Alabama with a Guard unit where there were no airplanes. He says that he worked on the campaign of Winton Blount, and there is a newspaper account quoting Blount workers that supports that. But, despite the fact that an award has been offered for fellow Guardsmen who could support Bush's claim of having served in Alabama, no one has come forward. And the record is very plain that Bush was not in Texas.

Additionally, the record makes it plain that Bush walked away from his post in Texas before receiving his commander's approval, and stayed in Alabama when his commander denied approval for the transfer. The record makes it plain that Bush is being dishonest about the record of his service even now.

The media have allowed candidate Bush to get away with claiming to have pushed through legislation that he had, in fact, obstructed or even vetoed-- will they now allow him to get away with claiming to his base that he served honorably, when in reality he seems to have deserted his post during the Vietnam War? If the election is to be about credibility, aren't the American people entitled to know the truth about George W. Bush's equivocations about his doubtful career in the National Guard?

The online veterans groups are reportedly buzzing with this news. Decide for yourself by reading the story at Online Journal, www.tompaine.com (three pieces), www2.georgemag.com (two pieces) and Walter Robinson's piece in the Boston Globe.


 
 Posted:   Oct 11, 2002 - 3:18 PM   
 By:   Eric Paddon   (Member)

When a story can't even pass the smell test with a left wing rag like Salon.com that says it all as to how strong its credibility is. Right up there with the author who wrote his loopy book about Bush the heavy drug user, and then lo and behold we discovered the author was a murderer with zero credibility.

But OTOH, the service records of Jim McDermott and David Bonior are quite clear, and they show no duty in Vietnam, and no exposure to the Vietnam War, their shameful remarks justifying their despicable actions in Bagdhad notwithstanding. And so long as you refuse to condemn that, or the fact that the Slickmeister was a documented draft dodger who cheered for the enemy while Americans were killed in Vietnam, you are nothing more than a hypocrite.

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 14, 2002 - 8:53 AM   
 By:   BarryConvex   (Member)

Having read some things by Mr. Paddon, it seems to me he is a big fan of J.A.G.

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 14, 2002 - 11:29 AM   
 By:   dragon53   (Member)

Being here in Houston, I can only comment that there doesn't appear to be a defintive answer to Bush's ANG service regarding whether he got prferential treatment or not. However I remember reading an relatively recent interview with several of his fellow pilots in the Texas ANG who commented that Bush was a regarded by them as being a very good F-102 pilot with outstanding flying skills. One thing which may add fuel to the fire is regarding the F-102. The F-102 is an interceptor---it is designed to protect a city from enemy bombers. A number of F-102 squadrons were sent to South Vietnam during the war to protect the South from possible North Vietnamese air attacks. Since there never was any credible air attack from the north, the F-102's spent most of their time in Vietnam with little to do. In other words, being in an F-102 squadron, particularly an ANG unit, was considered low-risk flying duty as far as seeing actual combat. Perhaps this is a coincidence, but I thought it would be worth mentioning.

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 14, 2002 - 11:36 AM   
 By:   dragon53   (Member)

P.S. Regarding president's wartime service, there are the controversies involving the World War II combat service of Bush, JFK and LBJ. Bush was accused of bailing out of his crippled Navy bomber early causing his two crewmen to die, JFK was accused of allowing his PT boat to be rammed by a Japanese destroyer and losing two crewmen and LBJ was accused of claiming to see air combat action when he did not. From what I've read of the three, LBJ is guilty, JFK is innocent and with Bush it's inconclusive.

 
 Posted:   Oct 14, 2002 - 4:34 PM   
 By:   Eric Paddon   (Member)

Having read some things by Mr. Paddon, it seems to me he is a big fan of J.A.G.


Never seen one episode.

 
 Posted:   Oct 14, 2002 - 4:40 PM   
 By:   Eric Paddon   (Member)

"Since there never was any credible air attack from the north, the F-102's spent most of their time in Vietnam with little to do. In other words, being in an F-102 squadron, particularly an ANG unit, was considered low-risk flying duty as far as seeing actual combat."

Responsible military planning nontheless dictated having such pilots available, low-risk or not. It would seem the slander that keeps getting made on the President is that he was not in some high-risk position, which in the end is to slander all other areas of the military who are needed for the non high-risk positions. It is only when a person who was not in a high-risk position attempts to falsely claim that he was, that dishonesty is present and condemnation becomes necessary. That is what David Bonior and Jim McDermott did (and Tom Harkin in his presidential campaign).

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.