 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A great SCIENTIST.
Unlike the naysayers he produced evidence of UFOs
Rip SF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A great SCIENTIST.
Unlike the naysayers he produced evidence of UFOs
Rip SF
If the naysayers produced evidence they wouldn't be naysayers.
How can you produce evidence of nothing?
Another ' swamp gas' inhaler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stanton Friedman was skilled at pointing out illogic, and thereby highlighting fallacy, factual inconsistency, and rank absurdity in official explanations for phenomena. He was not one to "worship" - he was a sensible cogent voice on matters of import. A scholar who studied phenomena... go figure.
He had a great term for debunking..." Science by proclamation".
In other words, " I don't believe it so it couldn't have happened"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posted: |
May 17, 2019 - 2:07 PM
|
|
|
|
By: |
Last Child
(Member)
|
The Pentagon’s Secret Search for UFOs
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/12/16/pentagon-ufo-search-harry-reid-216111
He described scores of unexplained sightings by Navy pilots and other observers of aircraft with capabilities far beyond what is currently considered aerodynamically possible. The sightings, Elizondo told POLITICO, were often reported in the vicinity of nuclear facilities, either ships at sea or power plants. "We had never seen anything like it."
But, in his view military leadership did not appear alarmed by the potential threat. "If a Russian 'Bear' bomber comes in near California, it is all over the news," he said. "These are coming in the skies over our facilities. Nothing but crickets."
The Pentagon’s AATIP program marked a 21st-century effort to replicate some of the decades of inconclusive research undertaken by the Pentagon in 1950s and 1960s to try to explain thousands of reported sightings of unidentified flying objects, or UFOs, by military and civilian pilots and average citizens—particularly an effort known as Project Bluebook that ran from 1947 to 1969 and is still a focus of intense interest for UFO researchers.
The more recent effort, which was established inside the Defense Intelligence Agency, compiled “reams of paperwork,” but little else, the former staffer said.
“After a while the consensus was we really couldn’t find anything of substance,” he recalled. “They produced reams of paperwork. After all of that there was really nothing there that we could find. It all pretty much dissolved from that reason alone—and the interest level was losing steam. We only did it a couple years.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
