 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you don't like it, fine, but you're in a minority. The rest of us know it's funny.
And another point on the title: the studio that holds the rights, approves and signs off in merchandising. They are strict. The merchandise has it as one word. And in the respective initial films, they characters say it as one word, not two. I mean, it is entirely within the realm of possibility it was never meant to be split up, but it was, and so they decided to keep that for the second film rather than cause confusion. Also keep in mind that you point to that sequel, but ignore that Ghostbusters: Afterlife is the third film in the franchise, so how does that film display the title? One word.
You want to argue that it's two words, but it's not clear cut and the available information points/leans way more toward one word.
I know, it's silly to go on about this, but you are telling people they are wrong when you in fact don't have a solid foundation for being "right".
Well, it IS clear cut and it's quite clearly two words on the screen, and if the onscreen title of a film isn't a solid foundation for what the title of a film is, what is? (I'll take your word for it on Afterlife [the fourth one] as I've only seen it once.)
I'll tell you something else for nothing: it's BEETLE JUICE. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
