Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2006 - 12:01 AM   
 By:   ahem   (Member)



Here we go again, the old ahem cliche.

Everything Arnold has ever done on his own is crap.
Everything Arnold ever done in collaboration with someone else is succesfull only because of that other person.


One of my favourite musicians of all time is Quincy Jones. That guy is an artist and a visionary genius. However, like David Arnold, he is best when he is surrounded by the right people to fill specialist jobs. Q makes no secret about it either, and the reason he has lasted so long is that he has NEVER put himself in the vulnerable position Arnold has of pretending to master an area he is inexperienced in. If QJ decided to songwrite/arrange/engineer/program/etc all of his work he would fall flat on his face, because we all know he cannot do the job. QJ just concentrates on improving and refining himself at what he does best: DIRECTING the specialists with the overall vision, and fine tuning their needs.

Arnold is talented, no doubt about that- AMAZING GRACE for example sounds beautiful- but his balls ups are as predictable as my rants, and only sell him short. Should always play to your strengths and develop those areas.

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2006 - 12:10 AM   
 By:   Membership Expired   (Member)

From the sounds of it you must be a big Zimmer fan, since that's basically what he's about. Anyway I'm done with Arnold discussion here for the time being.

Bye.

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2006 - 12:24 AM   
 By:   ahem   (Member)

From the sounds of it you must be a big Zimmer fan, since that's basically what he's about.


Personally, I find the quality of Zimmer's actual ideas to be rather poor. I think he's at his best in a specialist capacity uner another composer's direction, tucked away playing a backing synth for The Buggles, a keyboard for Stanley Myers or Shirley Walker on MASK OF THE PHANTASM. That's another thread though!

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2006 - 8:25 AM   
 By:   follow me   (Member)



But I'm pretty much done discussing Arnold on this board. It's almost as bad as trying to start a thread about James Horner. You just know it's going to be taken over by the same few posters spitting out the same old comments again about why said composer is a fucking hack and why everyone else is a fucking moron for liking one note he's ever written.

Hell even the John Williams Messageboard is more tolerant towards Arnold then this place.


No need to become whining and depressive! wink The reason I even registered here on this board was the constant Barry-bashing of Maestro Thor, who seemed to get great pleasures from calling Barry "an old fart waxing nostalgic over yesteryear" etc etc etc(http://www.filmscoremonthly.com/board/posts.asp?threadID=37200&forumID=1&pageID=2) As this thread is from October you can see for how long I have suffered silently before I decided to add a few comments myself... smile

So your remark "you just know it's going to be taken over by the same few posters spitting out the same old comments" works in both directions: you also know when the Anti-Barry-crew takes over spitting out the same old comments...

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2006 - 9:21 AM   
 By:   Membership Expired   (Member)

There is no anti-Barry crew on this forum, just thor.
Just like there isn't a anti-Goldsmith crew here.

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2006 - 9:56 AM   
 By:   Spymaster   (Member)

There is no anti-Barry crew on this forum, just thor.
Just like there isn't a anti-Goldsmith crew here.


And why is that, d'ya think? Could it be because Barry and Goldsmith are GOOD composers? Hmmmm ;-)

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2006 - 11:54 AM   
 By:   Thor   (Member)

Maestro Thor, who seemed to get great pleasures from calling Barry "an old fart waxing nostalgic over yesteryear" etc etc etc(http://www.filmscoremonthly.com/board/posts.asp?threadID=37200&forumID=1&pageID=2)

That was a comment directed specifically at something Barry said in an interview, just to keep things in context. Also, I've never "bashed" Barry or been part of any "anti-Barry" crew. I am just critical of certain aspects of his film music - both Bond and otherwise. No need to exaggerate things here.

NP: THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST (Debney)

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2006 - 12:05 PM   
 By:   Membership Expired   (Member)

I've never "bashed" Barry or been part of any "anti-Barry" crew. I am just critical of certain aspects of his film music - both Bond and otherwise.

I must agree with Thor. John Barry as good as he is, is hardly perfect.

Of course that goes for every composer that's discussed here.

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2006 - 10:06 PM   
 By:   follow me   (Member)

There is no anti-Barry crew on this forum, just thor.


O.K. Then it´s a one-man-crew big grin

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2006 - 10:09 PM   
 By:   follow me   (Member)



John Barry as good as he is, is hardly perfect.

Of course that goes for every composer that's discussed here.


There´s a good chance that this is even true of every human being.

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2006 - 10:20 PM   
 By:   follow me   (Member)


That was a comment directed specifically at something Barry said in an interview, just to keep things in context. Also, I've never "bashed" Barry or been part of any "anti-Barry" crew. I am just critical of certain aspects of his film music - both Bond and otherwise. No need to exaggerate things here.


Context or not: this is not a very noble remark. And Barry is right, too, but that´s probably because I am a younger fart...

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2006 - 10:55 PM   
 By:   Membership Expired   (Member)

Context or not: this is not a very noble remark.

It is not very noble, to be critical about film music, on a film music discussion forum?

I'm sorry i don't get that.

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 31, 2006 - 11:02 PM   
 By:   Spymaster   (Member)

It is not very noble, to be critical about film music, on a film music discussion forum?
I'm sorry i don't get that.


But he wasn't being critical about the music, he was being critical of the man. Referring to a composer as honoured and respected as John Barry as an "old fart" is certainly not very noble, although Barry himself would probably just smirk at the young fool's ridiculous and uneducated comment!

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 1, 2007 - 12:10 AM   
 By:   Membership Expired   (Member)

I'm sorry but considering the bad language and flame wars that frequently haunt this forum, I would say that Thor's comment was hardly THAT insulting, and probably ment as either a jest or a ironic hyperbole.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 1, 2007 - 6:51 AM   
 By:   follow me   (Member)

I'm sorry but considering the bad language and flame wars that frequently haunt this forum, I would say that Thor's comment was hardly THAT insulting, and probably ment as either a jest or a ironic hyperbole.

Well, maybe it´s O.K. to call another forum-member an "old fart", I don´t know (I only know that I would NOT like to be called such a name very much). In any case it is not very nice and it is arrogant to call a man of Barry´s age and reputation, a man who has contributed so MUCH to filmmusic (Remember? That´s what this forum is all about) an "old fart" (regardless, if you like his work or you don´t, regardless if Barry himself would only laugh at this remark or not)...

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 1, 2007 - 12:18 PM   
 By:   Membership Expired   (Member)

I'm not certain if you are indeed attacking Thor for the way he delivered his opinion than for the actual opinion itself.

If you care to look past the "old fart" comment you may find that Thor, who has something of a reputation for controversy here, usually has something of interest to say.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 1, 2007 - 1:25 PM   
 By:   Thor   (Member)

I called him "old fart" partly in jest and partly because Barry used the term on himself in that interview. No offense was intended, nor did I think it would ever be construed as such.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 1, 2007 - 7:42 PM   
 By:   follow me   (Member)

I'm not certain if you are indeed attacking Thor for the way he delivered his opinion than for the actual opinion itself.

If you care to look past the "old fart" comment you may find that Thor, who has something of a reputation for controversy here, usually has something of interest to say.



1. I definitely object to the way Thor "delivers" his opinion:

If I follow your advice and look "past the old fart comment", I find remarks like "but dear John, old boy" which show an astonishing amount of arrogance.

He then repeats his "fart-comment" several times ("So I'm not criticizing him or anything. I'm just pointing out that he comes off as an old fart in that interview. That's all.") Very nice. I guess this means "everything is fine, unfortunately he is an old fart."

Shortly afterwards he tries to lessen the impact of his words (as if he now noticed what he just had said) by writing "...I have all the respect in the world for Barry and his contribution to film (although I'm no big fan of his scores myself)".

Yes, you are right, Thor says "interesting things"...

2. It is no secret that I do not share Thor´s opinion on Barry, Arnold, filmmusic in general and (probably) weather, food, elephants, life etc etc etc

3. Then there´s an interesting Thor-remark: "I think ANYONE - even those who prefer the old Bond films - should be able to at least RECOGNIZE Barry's overwhelming sense of nostalgia for the past in that interview."

Replace the words "nostalgia for the past" with the word "quality" and then you get an idea what Barry REALLY was speaking about in this interview...

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 1, 2007 - 7:46 PM   
 By:   Thor   (Member)

Well, follow me, I'm happy that you're at least being entertained by my viewpoints and that you care so much about my opinions. smile

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 1, 2007 - 8:05 PM   
 By:   follow me   (Member)

Well, follow me, I'm happy that you're at least being entertained by my viewpoints and that you care so much about my opinions. smile

Yes, thank you very much. You gave me hours of entertainment - that´s the purpose of such a forum, I guess...and of course I care very much about your opinion: that´s almost like trying to understand some Martians for me. Very interesting, very exotic but unfortunately impossible in the end...

I will relax now listening to some good Arnold-Bond-scores. big grin
(Now THAT was a joke! No offense intended!)

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.